It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: oneoneone
If you mean the room moving instead of the object - yea, the chance is low, but you cannot exclude it.
originally posted by: Sly1one
I have a question that has been bugging me lately...a sort of paradox that maybe some here can help explain to me better than I have been able to do so far myself.
When an object is spinning on its own axis...or even orbiting...it is moving in two opposing directions simultaneously.
For example a wheel or even sphere spinning in a 3 dimensional space can be perceived/measured and concluded to be moving either clockwise...or counter clockwise...toward or away based on the perspective from which the measurement/observation was taken.
How can something/anything that is moving in two completely opposite directions be moving at all?
originally posted by: TinfoilTP
It can't be both because it is going one way and not the opposite way from the same relative perspective.
While the earth is spinning, it is also orbiting the sun which is orbiting the galactic center oscillating back and forth through the galactic plain, the galaxy is moving with a galactic cluster away from other galactic clusters which the clusters may or may not be oscillating in a wavelike pattern also.
originally posted by: Soylent Green Is People
originally posted by: Sly1one
I have a question that has been bugging me lately...a sort of paradox that maybe some here can help explain to me better than I have been able to do so far myself.
When an object is spinning on its own axis...or even orbiting...it is moving in two opposing directions simultaneously.
For example a wheel or even sphere spinning in a 3 dimensional space can be perceived/measured and concluded to be moving either clockwise...or counter clockwise...toward or away based on the perspective from which the measurement/observation was taken.
Heck -- we could make the mechanisms of analog clocks go the other direction, and call that direction "clockwise".
But it's all just semantics/how motion is described in words. Which artificial words we use top describe motion has nothing to do with the actual motion.
How can something/anything that is moving in two completely opposite directions be moving at all?
Because even in your examples, the things are NOT moving in two completely directions. They are only moving in one direction at any given time to any given observer -- but depending on the relative point of view of the observer, they may use different artificial made-up words to describe the motion.
You can call the initial assignment of clockwise versus counter-clockwise arbitrary and in some cases it is, but even so it's only one direction. There is even an example where it's not really arbitrary, the rotation of the planets. We can say that the rotation of planets on their axes is either in the same direction as the direction of their orbits, or in the opposite direction. Since this is expressed in relative terms your perspective is irrelevant, since the same will be true if you are "above" or "below" the planet or the "plane" of the solar system. Venus happens to be the only planet that spins in the opposite direction of its orbit:
originally posted by: Sly1one
originally posted by: TinfoilTP
It can't be both because it is going one way and not the opposite way from the same relative perspective.
Yea from the same relative perspective...but that perspective is subjective because its completely ignoring its equally valid counter perspective that it is indeed also going counter-clockwise.
If you're above the solar system plane, Venus rotates backwards relative to its own orbit and all the other planets. Change your perspective to below the solar system plane, and it still rotates backward from its own orbit and those of all the other planets.
Of all the planets in the Solar System, Venus has a unique rotation. Seen from above, all of the planets rotate in a counter-clockwise direction. And this is what you would expect if all the planets formed from the same planetary nebular billions of years ago.
And yet, the rotation of Venus is clockwise, what astronomers call “retrograde”. Venus rotates backwards.
originally posted by: framedragged
a reply to: Sly1one
I don't think you're actually picturing the situation correctly.
The object is rotating clock wise or counter clock wise, no matter what part you are looking at.
HOWEVER, when spinning clockwise the 'top' will going towards the right and the 'bottom' will be going to the left. This is the behavior you're talking about. But it's clockwise in both spots.
originally posted by: Soylent Green Is People
a reply to: Sly1one
Why just spin and rotation? Why not "up" and "down"?
A cannonball that I see as being shot straight up may be said to be moving straight down to a person who is standing on their head. Heck, a person who was riding the cannonball would say the ball is standing still in mid air, but the rest of the world was whooshing past them.
It's all a matter of relativity.