It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Greenpeace has apologised to the people of Peru after the government accused the environmentalists of damaging ancient earth markings in the country’s coastal desert by leaving footprints in the ground during a publicity stunt meant to send a message to the UN climate talks delegates in Lima.
A spokesman for Greenpeace said: “Without reservation Greenpeace apologises to the people of Peru for the offence caused by our recent activity laying a message of hope at the site of the historic Nazca lines. We are deeply sorry for this.
“Rather than relay an urgent message of hope and possibility to the leaders gathering at the Lima UN climate talks, we came across as careless and crass.”
Earlier Peru’s vice-minister for culture Luis Jaime Castillo had accused Greenpeace of “extreme environmentalism” and ignoring what the Peruvian people “consider to be sacred” after the protest at the world renowned Nazca lines, a Unesco world heritage site.
I can see it now: "Let's like, get our super-important message for sustainability in the here and now across, like, by desecrating an ancient cultural artifact... like, that would totally work and nobody can get angry with our message, maaaaan," said the Greenpeace dumbass while sipping on his fair-trade mocha latte in Starbucks.
Greenpeace has always been a radical type of group who like to violate the law and the rights of others to get their message across…
IMHO, their self-righteousness has gone to a new low with messing with the Nazca world heritage site.
originally posted by: intrptr
a reply to: NavyDoc
Greenpeace has always been a radical type of group who like to violate the law and the rights of others to get their message across…
To that end they practice civil disobedience. Looks like it worked (to get their message across). If they were 'radical types' they would have used explosives, like when idjits blew up the Buddha statue in Afghanistan.
IMHO, their self-righteousness has gone to a new low with messing with the Nazca world heritage site.
So lets focus on the messenger instead of the message.
If they had just 'plasticized' some message in the Sahara desert, nobody would even see it.
originally posted by: gortex
Yeah damn Greenpeace look at them wrecking the Nazca lines.
As I posted in the other thread this is an over hyped story based on nothing but an angry government trying to discredit the protest.
The lines have suffered damage but at the hands of Peruvian industry and government inaction not Greenpeace.
Don't buy the BS
Oh, so they were not there where they were not supposed to be and did not walk all over the site and did not spread large sheets of plastic all over the park?
According to the daily, the machinery belongs to a firm that is removing limestone from the area. The lines are located near kilometer marker 444 of the Panamericana Sur Highway. The area adjacent to the lines have reportedly also been affected, due to land being removed from the area.
Eduardo Herrán Gómez de la Torre, director of research at Ojos de Condor, described the extensive damage in the area. "We have witnessed the irreparable destruction to a set of lines and trapezoids that existed in the area,” Herrán said.
www.peruthisweek.com...
Another irony: spreading large sheets of plastic made by petrochemicals all over the landscape to protest petrochemicals.
originally posted by: gortex
a reply to: NavyDoc
Oh, so they were not there where they were not supposed to be and did not walk all over the site and did not spread large sheets of plastic all over the park?
Show me the damage Greenpeace did , I'd say judging by the video I posted of them laying the banner that it was negliable if any damage.
According to the daily, the machinery belongs to a firm that is removing limestone from the area. The lines are located near kilometer marker 444 of the Panamericana Sur Highway. The area adjacent to the lines have reportedly also been affected, due to land being removed from the area.
Eduardo Herrán Gómez de la Torre, director of research at Ojos de Condor, described the extensive damage in the area. "We have witnessed the irreparable destruction to a set of lines and trapezoids that existed in the area,” Herrán said.
www.peruthisweek.com...
Another irony: spreading large sheets of plastic made by petrochemicals all over the landscape to protest petrochemicals.
And just by looking at it you can tell that it's petrochemical plastic and not Biodegradable plastic.
originally posted by: NavyDoc
originally posted by: intrptr
a reply to: NavyDoc
Greenpeace has always been a radical type of group who like to violate the law and the rights of others to get their message across…
To that end they practice civil disobedience. Looks like it worked (to get their message across). If they were 'radical types' they would have used explosives, like when idjits blew up the Buddha statue in Afghanistan.
IMHO, their self-righteousness has gone to a new low with messing with the Nazca world heritage site.
So lets focus on the messenger instead of the message.
If they had just 'plasticized' some message in the Sahara desert, nobody would even see it.
So you think it's acceptable to damage a an ancient world heritage site that has cultural and sacred significance to indigenous peoples as long as you agree with the message?
originally posted by: intrptr
originally posted by: NavyDoc
originally posted by: intrptr
a reply to: NavyDoc
Greenpeace has always been a radical type of group who like to violate the law and the rights of others to get their message across…
To that end they practice civil disobedience. Looks like it worked (to get their message across). If they were 'radical types' they would have used explosives, like when idjits blew up the Buddha statue in Afghanistan.
IMHO, their self-righteousness has gone to a new low with messing with the Nazca world heritage site.
So lets focus on the messenger instead of the message.
If they had just 'plasticized' some message in the Sahara desert, nobody would even see it.
So you think it's acceptable to damage a an ancient world heritage site that has cultural and sacred significance to indigenous peoples as long as you agree with the message?
What damage? The US causes "damage" to whole nations. How significantly historical is that? Green Peace did it there because they knew the next tourist flight would capture it and put it up.
Like I said, it worked… even on you. Thanks for bringing it. Now people are seeing the "message" here, too.