It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Ghouls: ISIS trying to sell James Foley’s beheaded body

page: 1
18
<<   2  3 >>

log in

join
share:
+5 more 
posted on Dec, 11 2014 @ 05:46 PM
link   

For at least the last 48 hours, we have been engaged in a self-flagellating national conversation aimed at relitigating the debate over the morality and efficacy of the Bush-era CIA’s enhanced interrogation practices. This is an important and productive conversation to have. Everyone who is interested in prosecuting the War on Terror effectively should be concerned about whether those techniques are operationally valuable or if they are ultimately counterproductive.


Ghouls

While the decade old debate about torture is currently going on.

Take a GOOD LOOK at what is being defended.

How the hell are you suppose to fight the enemy that does this?

That does this:

Disgusting

That goes around cutting peoples heads off, and then tries to ell the BODY ?

And America is 'barbaric'.

Oh hell that dog don't hunt.




posted on Dec, 11 2014 @ 05:47 PM
link   
a reply to: neo96

Both as bad as each other in my book.
All monsters....



posted on Dec, 11 2014 @ 05:47 PM
link   
a reply to: neo96

Oops double post delete please.
edit on 11-12-2014 by boymonkey74 because: (no reason given)



posted on Dec, 11 2014 @ 05:53 PM
link   
So they are scum therefore we got to drop to their level?

What is exactly being defended, The scum or the moral integrity of America?



posted on Dec, 11 2014 @ 05:59 PM
link   
Plus torture doesn't work so why accept something which degrades your country and will breed more enemy's of the USA when it doesn't even work.
I can't believe anyone will back up this stuff.
Says alot about the person who backs up torture....



posted on Dec, 11 2014 @ 06:06 PM
link   
Considering it was the cia that set up Isis and al ca cia da(just ask Hilary cinton) it pretty much says it all USA supports creates and actively incourages terrorism it's Washington's greatest export and the only thing keeping the US economy afloat and God help the elite of the USA when the people of America wake up and smell the coffee it's going to dam messy the world was a peacefull place befor 9/11 compared to now a days now there is no denieing either the Bush government did 9/11 or they let it happen either way it's crime against humanity and the American people worst people in the world to mess with because they have more guns then people reply to: neo96


+8 more 
posted on Dec, 11 2014 @ 06:07 PM
link   
The fake outrage over anal feeding tubes vs no outrage on rusty knife beheadings.....ya who cares. What's next, did they have bacon in the nutrient pouches, the horror of it all.



posted on Dec, 11 2014 @ 06:13 PM
link   
a reply to: RyleeNator

No considering it was Saudi Arabia, and it's GIP that set up ISIS.

Because Sunni terrorism comes from the House of Saud.



The civil war in Syria, whose Alawite regime Saudi Arabia's Sunny monarchy has long plotted against, and the prospect of a war with Shiite Iran over its reported drive to acquire nuclear weapons, preoccupy Riyadh while, Abdallah, Canute-like, strives to keep the democratic wave from breaking on its shores. Read more: www.upi.com...




His elevation to chief of Saudi Arabia's vast intelligence network, and the unlimited funds it controls, came only one day after the embattled Damascus regime was battered by the loss of four of President Bashar Assad's most important security chiefs in a bombing inside the heavily guarded national security headquarters. Read more: www.upi.com...




A WikiLeaks released memo from the United States Secretary of State sent in 2009 asserted that the primary source of funding of Sunni terrorist groups worldwide was Saudi Arabia.[69]


en.wikipedia.org...

The correct term is Saudi's 'GIPda'.



posted on Dec, 11 2014 @ 06:14 PM
link   
a reply to: TinfoilTP


It is my understanding that there was outrage regarding both of those examples. To try to diminish the torture by calling responses to it "fake outrage" and then comparing it to (emotive terms) "rusty knife beheadings" and saying there was "no outrage" regarding this is disingenuous at best and an outright manipulative lie at worst.

I don't see why we can't condemn both, after all, they fell from the same tree of despicable behaviour.



posted on Dec, 11 2014 @ 06:23 PM
link   

originally posted by: aorAki
a reply to: TinfoilTP


It is my understanding that there was outrage regarding both of those examples. To try to diminish the torture by calling responses to it "fake outrage" and then comparing it to (emotive terms) "rusty knife beheadings" and saying there was "no outrage" regarding this is disingenuous at best and an outright manipulative lie at worst.

I don't see why we can't condemn both, after all, they fell from the same tree of despicable behaviour.


All I seen were countless liberal talking heads wailing about how we need to understand them and it is all the West's fault they are chopping heads off, and how it is not real just fake acting etc etc etc.



posted on Dec, 11 2014 @ 06:49 PM
link   
a reply to: TinfoilTP

I would suggest reading more widely than this forum and wherever else you get your news from then, as there definitely was a mass outcry against them. I do appreciate, however, that this is your chance to turn this discussion into yet another liberal vs conservative tirade.



posted on Dec, 11 2014 @ 07:24 PM
link   
a reply to: neo96

2 things...

Firstly, you can't defend one heinous act with another...
Or you can if you choose, but that makes you a hypocrite.



Secondly, the boy chopped in half story comes from a Christian website with Christian propaganda...
It's a blatant lie, from the same people who claimed a little Muslim girl killed by Assad's Army was a "Christian baby beheaded by IS"...
& they are one of the most deplorable sources on the Internet.

F*ck The Christian Post!!! Liars!!!



posted on Dec, 11 2014 @ 08:41 PM
link   
a reply to: CharlieSpeirs

What about Isis selling James Foley's headless body?

Here



posted on Dec, 11 2014 @ 08:57 PM
link   
a reply to: TinfoilTP

It's a heinous act...


I did state that, though it may not have been clear enough.


Not respectable or humane.



posted on Dec, 11 2014 @ 09:42 PM
link   
a reply to: CharlieSpeirs




Secondly, the boy chopped in half story comes from a Christian website with Christian propaganda...
It's a blatant lie, from the same people who claimed a little Muslim girl killed by Assad's Army was a "Christian baby beheaded by IS"...
& they are one of the most deplorable sources on the Internet.

F*ck The Christian Post!!! Liars!!!


Exactly.



posted on Dec, 12 2014 @ 01:34 AM
link   
So every times someone mentions how bad ISIS is.

Does anyone else except me think "perhaps US should not have created them by supporting Syrian Rebels with 500 million cash"

(cough cough)



posted on Dec, 12 2014 @ 04:02 AM
link   
a reply to: neo96

So IS are ghouls for trying to sell a corpse, but torturing both your enemies and those that you merely fear are your enemies with drowning and sexual abuse is not ghoulish?

Wow.

Only venal, weak minded children measure their morality by the standards of others.



posted on Dec, 12 2014 @ 04:16 AM
link   
Just as disgusting is the party that would buy the body from them .. with all the psychopaths in the world they probably have several already bidding on it .[snipped]
edit on Fri Dec 12 2014 by DontTreadOnMe because: off topic material removed.



posted on Dec, 12 2014 @ 05:53 AM
link   
a reply to: neo96

I'd b interested in buying it just to prove it existed in relaity and I would want DNA eveidence that it existed as a live body



posted on Dec, 12 2014 @ 07:37 AM
link   
I would rather have my son's remains cremated by dropping a couple MOAB's on their position.



new topics

top topics



 
18
<<   2  3 >>

log in

join