It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: tanka418
originally posted by: jericanman
hoax fottage or not who can tell... i guess no one
There is no hoax here...that is real footage of the "SpinSat" satellite being launched by ISS.
spaceflightnow.com...
A spherical U.S. Navy spacecraft the size of a beach ball spring-ejected from a new satellite deployer outside the International Space Station last week, debuting a fresh way for low-budget space missions to reach orbit.
The satellite — named SpinSat and developed by the Naval Research Laboratory — will test out new electrically-controlled micro-thrusters, help refine the military’s ability to track objects in space, and acquire data on the density of the tenuous upper layers of Earth’s atmosphere.
originally posted by: DenyObfuscation
originally posted by: tanka418
originally posted by: jericanman
hoax fottage or not who can tell... i guess no one
There is no hoax here...that is real footage of the "SpinSat" satellite being launched by ISS.
I think you got something there. SpinSat was deployed from the ISS Nov 28th.
spaceflightnow.com...
A spherical U.S. Navy spacecraft the size of a beach ball spring-ejected from a new satellite deployer outside the International Space Station last week, debuting a fresh way for low-budget space missions to reach orbit.
The satellite — named SpinSat and developed by the Naval Research Laboratory — will test out new electrically-controlled micro-thrusters, help refine the military’s ability to track objects in space, and acquire data on the density of the tenuous upper layers of Earth’s atmosphere.
originally posted by: DenyObfuscation
a reply to: heineken
I read somewhere it uses the JAXA robotic arm so that looks about right to me.
Bit of a letdown near the end of the vid as I was hoping for a 'Bugs Bunny wind-up' to launch.
originally posted by: JimOberg
originally posted by: Jelonek
...We have LOTS of footage of weird objects in orbit or space.
....
Since it's a weird new place, why shouldn't ordinary things look weird? Judging them by earthside processes is a recipe for self-imposed confusion.
originally posted by: tanka418
originally posted by: JimOberg
originally posted by: Jelonek
...We have LOTS of footage of weird objects in orbit or space.
....
Since it's a weird new place, why shouldn't ordinary things look weird? Judging them by earthside processes is a recipe for self-imposed confusion.
Really? Physics changes when you're off-world? And here I thought it was all the same...
originally posted by: JimOberg
originally posted by: tanka418
originally posted by: JimOberg
originally posted by: Jelonek
...We have LOTS of footage of weird objects in orbit or space.
....
Since it's a weird new place, why shouldn't ordinary things look weird? Judging them by earthside processes is a recipe for self-imposed confusion.
Really? Physics changes when you're off-world? And here I thought it was all the same...
Most people do, which is why so many are flummoxed by 'space UFO videos'.
Biggest difference is in interpreting illumination, since even with a dark earth and black sky in the field of view, the sun can also be 'out'. And in such situations, the spacecraft is projecting an invisible shadow out into the field of view and when little stuff drifts out of the shadow into sunlight, it becomes illuminated and visible -- and LOOKS like it materialized from nowhere.
Sound familiar?
originally posted by: tanka418
No...
Perhaps it is because I'm an engineer, perhaps because I paid attention in physics, or generally while in college, but, I have never experienced what you referring to. And, you're not referring to the physics / mechanics of what is observed either, yet you seemed to imply that somehow the physics did change, when of course it cannot.
originally posted by: tanka418
Perhaps it is because I'm an engineer, perhaps because I paid attention in physics, or generally while in college, but, I have never experienced what you referring to. ....
originally posted by: JimOberg
originally posted by: tanka418
No...
Perhaps it is because I'm an engineer, perhaps because I paid attention in physics, or generally while in college, but, I have never experienced what you referring to. And, you're not referring to the physics / mechanics of what is observed either, yet you seemed to imply that somehow the physics did change, when of course it cannot.
Are we fussing over a misreading of my comment?
The processes that I suggested needed changing were visual interpretation algorithms in our brains.
I don't think I ever said the physics changed, although clearly the motion of nearby objects is subject to a whole new set of physical laws.
I'm trying to bridge that experience gap. Please help me.