It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: chopperswolf
"Magma, as liquid, preferentially forms in high temperature, low pressure environments within several kilometers of the Earth's surface." quoted from Wikipedia, so, thats where we live, the earths surface, and several kilometers, which is pretty close to the surface relatively, thats also where these big rocks that rub and make earthquakes are at also, right? so, whats under that? wasn't there just a discovery of a giant underground ocean, or absu, that scientist just discovered recently, where did that come from, and how could it exist around that huge ball of molten magnetic iron? a reply to: ScientificRailgun
originally posted by: chopperswolf
"4 Temperatures like these are found at the base of the lithosphere. This is the solid, outermost layer of the earth. It includes the crust and the upper mantle. Just below the lithosphere is the asthenosphere. This layer is partly molten rock. Temperatures here are also very hot."- this is from the article you refered me to.
a reply to: Krazysh0t
originally posted by: deadeyedick
Maybe all you followers of the religion of science can remind me why i should choose to accept your lies? Please tell me why it is necessary for everyone to remain dumb about where we are and why we should continue to stay here? I have put your puzzle together and i do not want to be hasty and let the cat out of the bag if there is a good reason you continue to dumb down the cat with your linguistic trickery you dasterdly servents of mental tyranny. Why should i let your lies continue when i now can unwind all your power you come here to harness? I am all for what has been created here but it has gone over board. There are too many slaves in this system.
Every time I ever heated iron to a molten state, it became non magnetic. if the molten liquid outer core is spinning, and moving around a non molten inner core, producing magnetic fields because of Coriolis effect, created by the outer layers moving around the molten outer core currents, and we are talking about magnetism, not gravity, they aren't the same are they? why is there such a large percentage on iron ore on the surface of the earth, why has it not subducted and sank to this magnetic core, it is already a heavier element than the composition of the surface where it is found, and it's magnetic, wouldn't it have sank into the ground already millions of years ago?
originally posted by: ScientificRailgun
a reply to: chopperswolf
You forgot what was below all that dirt, rock, and water.
Magma. And lot of it.
Oh and let's not forget our wonderful Magnetic Field, which is generated by a liquid IRON core. If there were any need for proof of a solid earth, it's the magnetic field we all enjoy.
originally posted by: chopperswolf
wasn't there just a discovery of a giant underground ocean
originally posted by: chopperswolf
Would the testimony of those who say they have been there be any less believable than that of theorist who have not been there, but have made up a story based on a set of flawed rules and educated guesses? what is the truth? a reply to: ScientificRailgun
originally posted by: deadeyedick
Maybe all you followers of the religion of science can remind me why i should choose to accept your lies? Please tell me why it is necessary for everyone to remain dumb about where we are and why we should continue to stay here? I have put your puzzle together and i do not want to be hasty and let the cat out of the bag if there is a good reason you continue to dumb down the cat with your linguistic trickery you dasterdly servents of mental tyranny. Why should i let your lies continue when i now can unwind all your power you come here to harness? I am all for what has been created here but it has gone over board. There are too many slaves in this system.
originally posted by: chopperswolf
Would the testimony of those who say they have been there be any less believable than that of theorist who have not been there, but have made up a story based on a set of flawed rules and educated guesses? what is the truth? a reply to: ScientificRailgun