a reply to: bkfd54
We think there Is an abundance of H2O Water on the Earth in all three possabiltys
Gas steam clouds ect
Compared to the mass of the Planet the Earths crust is thin this includes the sea beds,
The oceans all though covering three otrs of the Planets surface .
H2O Solid liquid an Gas makes up a minute amount of resourses on the earth.
The bulk of Earths Mass would be magma molten volcanic rock ,This would acount for a good 70 percent of our MASS next Would be molten iron 28 PERCENT
trace elements gold copper qaertz .
Earths solid crust mix of rocks sandstone clays sand dust gravel swamps an ocean floor less than ten thousands percentge of Earths mass.
Same with H20 it makes up less than one percent of one percent of Earths mass .
But how much of Earth is water — how much water contributes to the actual mass of the planet? This includes not just the surface of the Earth, but
inside as well. Scientists calculate that the total mass of the oceans on Earth is 1.35 x 1018 metric tonnes, which is 1/4400 the total mass of the
Earth. In other words, while the oceans cover 71% of the Earth’s surface, they only account for 0.02% of our planet’s total mass.
The origin of water on the Earth’s surface, as well as the fact that it has more water than any other rocky planet in the Solar System, are two of
long-standing mysteries concerning our planet.
We have all heard the myriad of differing theories an gettttttttting very Leeds United over Rosetas provideing us with data to test samples from the
An this all seems unlikley due to the hop skip and jump landing on its side in some narrow crevice basicly sods law .
Could have landed anchors deployed safe landing.
That did not happen anchors grapples didnt fire so bounced up back in to space this along with the comets rotation .
Final landing was worse case scenario but look its a case of glass half full not long ago, it was believed that our planet formed dry some 4.6
billion years ago, with high-energy impacts creating a molten surface on the infant Earth. According to this theory, water was brought to the
world’s oceans thanks to icy comets, trans-Neptunian objects or water-rich meteoroids (protoplanets) from the outer reaches of the main asteroid
belt colliding with the Earth.
However, more recent research conducted by the Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution (WHOI) in Woods Hole, Massachusetts, has pushed the date of these
origins back further. According to this new study, the world’s oceans also date back 4.6 billion years, when all the worlds of the inner Solar
System were still forming.
This conclusion was reached by examining meteorites thought to have formed at different times in the history of the Solar System. Carbonaceous
chondrite, the oldest meteorites that have been dated to the very earliest days of the Solar System, were found to have the same chemistry as those
originating from protoplanets like Vesta. This includes a significance presence of water.
These meteorites are dated to the same epoch in which water was believed to have formed on Earth – some 11 million years after the formation of the
Solar System. In short, it now appears that meteorites were depositing water on Earth in its earliest days.
Comets are descrbed as the remnant building matter that formed the proto rocky type inner plantioids by accreation.,
BILLIONS of years ago comets were huge dirty snowballs packed with ice carbons .
Enough snowballs acreating together will eventualy give you a planet with a a thick atmosphere with a high percentage of steam h20 mixed with
sulphuric amonias acidics .
When it did fall an cool a liquid rain that fell would have dissolved rocks upon landing raising the toxity of an already toxic enviroment for life to
try an develop in.
Those chemical stripping acid rains sure would have produces huge amounts of chemical reactions in thease early toxic soups.
And you know what chemical reactions produce an abundance off?
An you know what loves energy ?
So much free energy going on not to be exploited we know the early life forms couldnt use photo synthises for energy .
No the first life forms used heat from volcanic vents an lived of the breakdown of chemicals the rich mineral soup prouduced around thease vents.
They were like oasis in the freezing stark deep early oceans Blacksmokers vented heat energy food an for a limited areas around it were perfect for
colonys of differing life forms to frourish.
There are life forms today we name extremeaphiles beca use of there ability to live in what we consider a harsh enviroment.
But when early life evolved all early enviroments were extreme ,
Its like life will out were we see energy we see energy converters .
We are energy converters all life converts energys .
Plants use the energy store an convert the light photons .
The light the require though is at the lower spectrum only photons from red spectrum or yellow spectrum are reqired for maximum photoshthisise .
Higher Spectrum lights green spectrum are rejected .
Thats why most plants apear green.
Green light green energy plant do not absorb so they reject .deflect reflect the green bounce them back out to us
I know you think I deserve a degree in stateing the bleeding obvious.
How ever Plants only use a small portions of photons from the low specrum red an yellow an ignore all the high freqency wave length photons.
This may sound wastefull but like all life .
Plant life bean evolved deep in the ocean an utiliseing photo syhthisise in the early sea ..High freqenct light wouldnt reach penetrate radiate energy
as deep as low spectrum low freqncy penetrates deeper.
So plants evolved early on useing only photons of a certain spectrum.
The other higher spectrum they didnt use iys photons to photoshnthise ,
How does a plant know wich is wich is wich so this link explains what they theorise the plant does ,
Reason I stated the blrrrdin obvious though was in link wich is interesting they tell you all about the discovery an how smart an ausome the plant
They dont explain why or its sygnificance ,Stateing only the plants ability to use quontom phycics is somehow other worldly?
When its perfect logic every thing in the micro sub atomic world of photons works an is described at 99,9 acccuracy useing quantom predicting.
So why be dumbfounded at plants use quantom antanglement.Grass has exploited humans in the macro world becomeing the dominant plant on the Planet.
We have been mesmerised an grass has made it self indisspensable to us.
All our favouraye food stuffs wheat corn barley derived from types of grass all our favourate beverages derived from grasses wheat barley rice is yet
another type of grass,
Sports Golf football grass for leisure parks an gardens grass is amongst our favourate for loungeing on ,
So our relation ship is symbiotic we spread it wher ever we went,
Today we are destroying rainforrests to plant grass wheat crops raise cattle propagateing grass into an enviroment it could never have cultivated so
quick an rapid with out our asssistance.
Plants exploit bees to polanate use birds to eat there seeds make them ready to plant .
Drop them miles away to spread an even have guano bird poo to feed an fertilise the growing tree.
So why be suprised that nature ubderstands quantom physcics