It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: AnonSocialNetwork
May I respectfully ask what you are doing to help regarding this topic?
originally posted by: crazyewok
originally posted by: JohnnyCanuck
How about dropping brown envelopes to the right people and places?
Who are the right people and places?
This thing in the UK goes all the way to the top.
The police, the Media, the child protection services? They could and likely all are compromised.
The very top echelons of the public and private sector cant be trusted.
I am grateful for your MSM news links, but I was already aware of them all.
originally posted by: Golden Rule
It has lately appeared to me that Stanley Kubrick's 1999 film Eyes Wide Shut is only a pale version of what it may have been intended to be. I mean the film plot gradually builds up to a what seems as if a very chilling and creepy revelation. Which turns out to be what? - The rich and powerful holding a private party where they have public sex with adult female prostitutes. Granted it appears to be part of satanic ritual and the club members wear masks to hide their identities but what is so scary or cutting edge about that? Satanic imagery has been a popular modern cultural phenomenon for quite some time now - at least since the 1970s. Film makers as a rule hope to somehow surprise their audiences with some sort of novel theme as a formula for success. What is novel about Eyes Wide Shut? Black masses have been a part of the horror genre since Hammer Horror films of the 1970s.
Now if Tom Cruise had unwittingly blundered into a satanic ritual where young boys were being openly sodomised and their primal energies were being sucked out as David Icke explains through their root chakras and through special cinematic effects that energy was being transferred through ritual to Satan himself..... who bestowed positions of power to these perverse and corrupted individuals. ....A mask slips and we see the grotesque grinning skull-like face of Jimmy Sa'vile then camera pans left to another masked figure next to him who is laughing uncontrollably...a figure who plays with his cufflink ...
There is certainly something unnerving about the film the cause of which is not immediately apparent. Is it the film score? The background soundtrack is certainly eerie. But what appears to me is that there are masks behind the masks - masks in the real world casting a compromising shadow across the fictional world. Control and fear.
Responding to the report by NSPCC director, Peter Wanless (known as the Wanless Report), David Cameron said “It is important that it [the report] says that there wasn’t a cover-up. Some of the people who’ve been looking for conspiracy theories will have to look elsewhere”. A couple of important points. One is that the Wanless report did not say there was or was not a cover-up. It stated that investigations found no evidence of a cover up, and that a cover-up was unlikely based on the information Wanless was able to access. Secondly, claims of abuse within the corridors of power have never been a ‘theory’. There has been clear evidence time and again that some kind of abuse of children was highly likely to be taking place by high profile abusers. The problem has been taking investigations forward when there is institutional protection which makes accessing information or investigating high profile suspects extremely difficult. Political influence has played a key role in inhibiting past investigations. Perhaps Cameron is very keen to sweep this matter under the carpet as soon as possible, perhaps to prevent more damage to the Conservatives before the general election. He certainly seems to have changed his mind since October 2012 when he stated that the concerns of Labour MP Tom Watson, who raised the matter of a high-level paedophile network operating within Parliament, should be fully investigated. Another U-turn for Cameron when it suits his agenda.
originally posted by: daftpink
Do you have the source where David Cameron said this was a conspiracy theory?
originally posted by: ATODASO
a reply to: Golden Rule
actually, the pedophilia IS there, but kubrick slipped it by the casual viewer. that's his m.o.
the first, and most obvious reference is the costume maker's daughter, later offered to bill as a prostitute.
in the last scene, when bill and his wife are reconciling in the dept store, watch the background. there are two men who were at the christmas party earlier in the film. with a pensive glance over her shoulder, their daughter helena follows the men out of the aisle and out of sight of her self-absorbed parents. that's the subtle reference.
supposedly, after kubrick's death, a single clip was removed in post-production. when bill is at the orgy, he walks by a room with an open door. through the door, the viewer can spy a pentagram inscribed on the floor. just that 3 seconds would have changed the entire film. but that's apocryphal, and neither the film nor the real life version require the spectre of dark magic to be #ing nauseating.
think about that the next time you see david icke or vigilant citizen or whomever tie this in with spooky magic. think about how many casual readers will discard the whole issue because it's been tied to that silliness by the alternative media. a normal person will have a natural reluctance to believe that organized pedophilia exists on the scale that it does, and dressing the perps in robes and masks and claiming that they do it for satanz allows them the out they need to dismiss it all as fiction.
these #heads do what they do because they LIKE it. not because "satan".