It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
So would you suggest that the health of a nation should be defined merely by the figures of national accountants? If there is widespread and increasing unhappiness - which I believe there is - the figures published by these experts don't seem to mean much. Talk of a healthy economy seems to do no more than give peace of mind to the already financially comfortable.
originally posted by: stumason
a reply to: Robert Reynolds
I won't deny, they would be my favoured option come next year because, all other things aside, the Tories do know how to run an economy properly
There's really no need to refute any so called 'facts' until they've been satisfactorily proved. I don't really have much faith in the claims of those involved in the financial or political arenas - whether they claim impartiality or not. Call me a cynic, but I'm pretty sure the world is run by liars.
However, what I said is factually accurate - feel free to refute any of it if you can.
What's with accusing me of moaning and bitching? You just seem to want to pick a fight. Why would I have some plan for managing the nation? It's not my job. You might think that the government's doing fine job, myself and I think many others - don't.
originally posted by: grainofsand
a reply to: Robert Reynolds
...so no plan then, just moan on the internet without suggesting any options how to change the things you may (or may not) be bitching about being wrong in the UK?
Yeah, when I've got all the answers I'll come straight to you: 'I've cracked it! I'll best get straight on ATS and tell that grainofsand bloke, because I'm so desperate to seek his approval - or failing that provoke him to an argument, providing he can put up with my bitching and moaning'.
OK, come back to me when you have some actual plan or opinion which has more influence than a fakebook like.
originally posted by: Robert Reynolds
So would you suggest that the health of a nation should be defined merely by the figures of national accountants? If there is widespread and increasing unhappiness - which I believe there is - the figures published by these experts don't seem to mean much. Talk of a healthy economy seems to do no more than give peace of mind to the already financially comfortable.
originally posted by: Robert Reynolds
There's really no need to refute any so called 'facts' until they've been satisfactorily proved.
originally posted by: Robert Reynolds
I don't really have much faith in the claims of those involved in the financial or political arenas - whether they claim impartiality or not. Call me a cynic, but I'm pretty sure the world is run by liars.
I personally believe the financial system to be privately run scam used as warfare against the masses and that it's thousands of years old.
originally posted by: stumason
a reply to: Soloprotocol
We all know how well you are at predicting the future Solo, so don't blame me if I don't hold my breath waiting for your nihilistic vision to come about, which I actually think is more of a desire on your part than actually based in any fact.
I sincerely hope you are around in 10 years, once you've lived a little, so we can come back and have chuckle over your doom and gloom posting.