It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Pregnant Woman Perfectly Tells Off Anti-Abortion Protestors

page: 12
25
<< 9  10  11    13  14  15 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Dec, 8 2014 @ 01:01 PM
link   
a reply to: Lyxdeslic

"There is a difference between a clump of cells and a human being."

I disagree. A human being is simply a clump of cells.




posted on Dec, 8 2014 @ 01:02 PM
link   

originally posted by: Krazysh0t
a reply to: Dfairlite

You are grasping at straws here with your argument. If you cannot see the difference between a baby being breast fed and a fetus literally growing inside a mother's womb, you have a LONG way to go in your education of human anatomy.


Tell, me, why is that fetus growing inside that womb? Did it just happen!? Or was it the result of a choice?



posted on Dec, 8 2014 @ 01:02 PM
link   

originally posted by: Krazysh0t

originally posted by: Dfairlite
a reply to: Krazysh0t

"Adults don't suck the life out of their mother while they are aging for 9 months."

Using this logic you should be able to kill your born children at any point that they can't fend for themselves. I mean, I have to feed them for them to grow and to feed them I have to go to work, which sucks the life out of me.


No, I am being literal here when I say "suck the life out of their mother." A fetus literally takes the nutrients that a mother needs to live to grow and develop directly from the mother. This causes all sorts of problems for the mother up to and including the birth.



Mhm. You know, there are some people who have autoimmune diseases where the timing has to be perfect in order to have a healthy pregnancy and not die. I have Lupus and have been told multiple times that I need to speak with doctors before even attempting to get pregnant, because it could KILL me. Sorry, but my life is much more important than a clump of cells.



posted on Dec, 8 2014 @ 01:03 PM
link   

originally posted by: Dfairlite

originally posted by: windword
a reply to: Dfairlite




Using this logic you should be able to kill your born children at any point that they can't fend for themselves.


Once born, "someone else" can care for your child. Until we can find "someone else" to carry a child to term, besides the pregnant woman who wants an abortion, your logic makes no sense.


Have you not seen the stats proving the opposite, they're posted just above on this page!


Please, there are no stats that show "someone else" carrying another woman's pregnancy to term.



posted on Dec, 8 2014 @ 01:04 PM
link   

originally posted by: Lyxdeslic

originally posted by: Krazysh0t

originally posted by: Dfairlite
a reply to: Krazysh0t

"Adults don't suck the life out of their mother while they are aging for 9 months."

Using this logic you should be able to kill your born children at any point that they can't fend for themselves. I mean, I have to feed them for them to grow and to feed them I have to go to work, which sucks the life out of me.


No, I am being literal here when I say "suck the life out of their mother." A fetus literally takes the nutrients that a mother needs to live to grow and develop directly from the mother. This causes all sorts of problems for the mother up to and including the birth.



Mhm. You know, there are some people who have autoimmune diseases where the timing has to be perfect in order to have a healthy pregnancy and not die. I have Lupus and have been told multiple times that I need to speak with doctors before even attempting to get pregnant, because it could KILL me. Sorry, but my life is much more important than a clump of cells.


And most reasonable people will agree with you. Rape, incest, life of mother are the only legitimate reasons for an abortion.



posted on Dec, 8 2014 @ 01:05 PM
link   

originally posted by: windword

originally posted by: Dfairlite

originally posted by: windword
a reply to: Dfairlite




Using this logic you should be able to kill your born children at any point that they can't fend for themselves.


Once born, "someone else" can care for your child. Until we can find "someone else" to carry a child to term, besides the pregnant woman who wants an abortion, your logic makes no sense.


Have you not seen the stats proving the opposite, they're posted just above on this page!


Please, there are no stats that show "someone else" carrying another woman's pregnancy to term.



You misunderstood, the stats prove that someone else can't take care of your child. So you should be able to just kill them.



posted on Dec, 8 2014 @ 01:05 PM
link   

originally posted by: Dfairlite

originally posted by: Krazysh0t
a reply to: Dfairlite

You are grasping at straws here with your argument. If you cannot see the difference between a baby being breast fed and a fetus literally growing inside a mother's womb, you have a LONG way to go in your education of human anatomy.


Tell, me, why is that fetus growing inside that womb? Did it just happen!? Or was it the result of a choice?


Changing your argument after your first one fell flat on its face I see. I can play this game all day.

Sex is a choice that the mother made. Just like getting an abortion is a choice. The mother CAN be pro-choice and CHOOSE to not have an abortion because she personally doesn't believe in getting them.

If she does go through with the abortion, well the mental anguish that she must go through is hers and hers alone (and maybe her gods). It certainly isn't yours or mine.
edit on 8-12-2014 by Krazysh0t because: (no reason given)



posted on Dec, 8 2014 @ 01:06 PM
link   

originally posted by: Dfairlite

originally posted by: Krazysh0t
a reply to: Dfairlite

You are grasping at straws here with your argument. If you cannot see the difference between a baby being breast fed and a fetus literally growing inside a mother's womb, you have a LONG way to go in your education of human anatomy.


Tell, me, why is that fetus growing inside that womb? Did it just happen!? Or was it the result of a choice?


And was it their choice for the condom to break? Was it their choice for spermacide not to work? Was it their choice when they got pregnant and the women was on the Depo shot (This actually happens and is terrifying.)

No. Sex is part of a healthy relationship. You're right, sex is a choice. But a lot of people actually take preventative measures against getting pregnant and still preggo their eggo.



posted on Dec, 8 2014 @ 01:09 PM
link   

originally posted by: Krazysh0t

originally posted by: Dfairlite

originally posted by: Krazysh0t
a reply to: Dfairlite

You are grasping at straws here with your argument. If you cannot see the difference between a baby being breast fed and a fetus literally growing inside a mother's womb, you have a LONG way to go in your education of human anatomy.


Tell, me, why is that fetus growing inside that womb? Did it just happen!? Or was it the result of a choice?


Changing your argument after your first one fell flat on its face I see. I can play this game all day.

Sex is a choice that the mother made. Just like getting an abortion is a choice. The mother CAN be pro-choice and CHOOSE to not have an abortion because she personally doesn't believe in getting them.

If she does go through with the abortion, well the mental anguish that she must go through is hers and hers alone (and maybe her gods). It certainly isn't yours or mine.


"Sex is a choice that the mother made. Just like getting an abortion is a choice."

It's not about choices it's about murder. Mom agreed to the odds of getting pregnant by engaging in intercourse. Abortion is the equivalent for asking for your money back because the roulette wheel didn't work out in your favor. Except instead of money, your murdering a child.



posted on Dec, 8 2014 @ 01:10 PM
link   

originally posted by: Lyxdeslic

originally posted by: Dfairlite

originally posted by: Krazysh0t
a reply to: Dfairlite

You are grasping at straws here with your argument. If you cannot see the difference between a baby being breast fed and a fetus literally growing inside a mother's womb, you have a LONG way to go in your education of human anatomy.


Tell, me, why is that fetus growing inside that womb? Did it just happen!? Or was it the result of a choice?


And was it their choice for the condom to break? Was it their choice for spermacide not to work? Was it their choice when they got pregnant and the women was on the Depo shot (This actually happens and is terrifying.)

No. Sex is part of a healthy relationship. You're right, sex is a choice. But a lot of people actually take preventative measures against getting pregnant and still preggo their eggo.


And so murder is justified? Did they not know that condoms could break, that birth control was not 100% effective? Is ignorance an excuse?

"Sex is part of a healthy relationship"
So is murder apparently.

edit on 8-12-2014 by Dfairlite because: (no reason given)

edit on 8-12-2014 by Dfairlite because: (no reason given)



posted on Dec, 8 2014 @ 01:13 PM
link   

originally posted by: Dfairlite

originally posted by: windword

originally posted by: Dfairlite

originally posted by: windword
a reply to: Dfairlite




Using this logic you should be able to kill your born children at any point that they can't fend for themselves.


Once born, "someone else" can care for your child. Until we can find "someone else" to carry a child to term, besides the pregnant woman who wants an abortion, your logic makes no sense.


Have you not seen the stats proving the opposite, they're posted just above on this page!


Please, there are no stats that show "someone else" carrying another woman's pregnancy to term.



You misunderstood, the stats prove that someone else can't take care of your child. So you should be able to just kill them.


What are you saying? That there are no people that will take care of unwanted babies? Well then, in that case, that's another good argument against adoption and for abortion.


edit on 8-12-2014 by windword because: (no reason given)



posted on Dec, 8 2014 @ 01:13 PM
link   

originally posted by: Dfairlite

originally posted by: Lyxdeslic

originally posted by: Dfairlite

originally posted by: Krazysh0t
a reply to: Dfairlite

You are grasping at straws here with your argument. If you cannot see the difference between a baby being breast fed and a fetus literally growing inside a mother's womb, you have a LONG way to go in your education of human anatomy.


Tell, me, why is that fetus growing inside that womb? Did it just happen!? Or was it the result of a choice?


And was it their choice for the condom to break? Was it their choice for spermacide not to work? Was it their choice when they got pregnant and the women was on the Depo shot (This actually happens and is terrifying.)

No. Sex is part of a healthy relationship. You're right, sex is a choice. But a lot of people actually take preventative measures against getting pregnant and still preggo their eggo.


And so murder is justified?



Abortion is not murder. It's literally a clump of cells. You could call those cells a friggin parasite because they can't survive on their own. They have to live within a host and form into something else for 8-9 months, before they can live on their own.

With your logic, people shouldn't take antibiotics because it kills cells, good and bad.

And yes, some murder is justified. If I am attacked, you bet your ass I am aiming to kill, and it would be justified because my life is in danger.

And yes, to tie this together, getting pregnant can put some Would Be mothers in danger.



posted on Dec, 8 2014 @ 01:14 PM
link   

originally posted by: windword

originally posted by: Dfairlite

originally posted by: windword

originally posted by: Dfairlite

originally posted by: windword
a reply to: Dfairlite




Using this logic you should be able to kill your born children at any point that they can't fend for themselves.


Once born, "someone else" can care for your child. Until we can find "someone else" to carry a child to term, besides the pregnant woman who wants an abortion, your logic makes no sense.


Have you not seen the stats proving the opposite, they're posted just above on this page!


Please, there are no stats that show "someone else" carrying another woman's pregnancy to term.



You misunderstood, the stats prove that someone else can't take care of your child. So you should be able to just kill them.


What are you saying? That there are no people that will take care of unwanted babies? Well then, in that case, that's another good argument against adoption and for abortion.



Yes, and it's also a good argument for the legal right to kill your own children if you don't want them.



posted on Dec, 8 2014 @ 01:15 PM
link   
a reply to: Dfairlite

Abortion doesn't kill children.



posted on Dec, 8 2014 @ 01:15 PM
link   

originally posted by: Dfairlite

originally posted by: Krazysh0t

originally posted by: Dfairlite

originally posted by: Krazysh0t
a reply to: Dfairlite

You are grasping at straws here with your argument. If you cannot see the difference between a baby being breast fed and a fetus literally growing inside a mother's womb, you have a LONG way to go in your education of human anatomy.


Tell, me, why is that fetus growing inside that womb? Did it just happen!? Or was it the result of a choice?


Changing your argument after your first one fell flat on its face I see. I can play this game all day.

Sex is a choice that the mother made. Just like getting an abortion is a choice. The mother CAN be pro-choice and CHOOSE to not have an abortion because she personally doesn't believe in getting them.

If she does go through with the abortion, well the mental anguish that she must go through is hers and hers alone (and maybe her gods). It certainly isn't yours or mine.


"Sex is a choice that the mother made. Just like getting an abortion is a choice."

It's not about choices it's about murder. Mom agreed to the odds of getting pregnant by engaging in intercourse. Abortion is the equivalent for asking for your money back because the roulette wheel didn't work out in your favor. Except instead of money, your murdering a child.


That is a perfectly fine opinion to have, except the mother in this case will be getting the abortion regardless. So we owe it to her to make it safe for her.

You still haven't addressed the point about all those children that WEREN'T aborted that are now awaiting foster care from parents looking to adopt. If we make abortion illegal, do you think that number will go down or up? Are you willing to take one of those children in if you make abortion illegal?



posted on Dec, 8 2014 @ 01:16 PM
link   

originally posted by: Dfairlite

originally posted by: Lyxdeslic

originally posted by: Dfairlite

originally posted by: Krazysh0t
a reply to: Dfairlite

You are grasping at straws here with your argument. If you cannot see the difference between a baby being breast fed and a fetus literally growing inside a mother's womb, you have a LONG way to go in your education of human anatomy.


Tell, me, why is that fetus growing inside that womb? Did it just happen!? Or was it the result of a choice?


And was it their choice for the condom to break? Was it their choice for spermacide not to work? Was it their choice when they got pregnant and the women was on the Depo shot (This actually happens and is terrifying.)

No. Sex is part of a healthy relationship. You're right, sex is a choice. But a lot of people actually take preventative measures against getting pregnant and still preggo their eggo.


And so murder is justified? Did they not know that condoms could break, that birth control was not 100% effective? Is ignorance an excuse?

"Sex is part of a healthy relationship"
So is murder apparently.



People are not perfect. Nothing is always effective. But you can't really blame a couple that uses preventative measures and it fails. They were responsible. Honestly, if you want to make abortion illegal, than let's make it so YOU have to take care of all the mothers that live through botched back alley abortions. Lets make it so YOU have to take care of all the unwanted children. Can you handle it? I hope so.



posted on Dec, 8 2014 @ 01:16 PM
link   
a reply to: Lyxdeslic

And again, I agree with having the choice of abortion if the mothers life is in jeopardy. Children cannot survive on their own either, they're parasites just the same. Kill 'em.



posted on Dec, 8 2014 @ 01:18 PM
link   

originally posted by: Krazysh0t

originally posted by: Dfairlite

originally posted by: Krazysh0t

originally posted by: Dfairlite

originally posted by: Krazysh0t
a reply to: Dfairlite

You are grasping at straws here with your argument. If you cannot see the difference between a baby being breast fed and a fetus literally growing inside a mother's womb, you have a LONG way to go in your education of human anatomy.


Tell, me, why is that fetus growing inside that womb? Did it just happen!? Or was it the result of a choice?


Changing your argument after your first one fell flat on its face I see. I can play this game all day.

Sex is a choice that the mother made. Just like getting an abortion is a choice. The mother CAN be pro-choice and CHOOSE to not have an abortion because she personally doesn't believe in getting them.

If she does go through with the abortion, well the mental anguish that she must go through is hers and hers alone (and maybe her gods). It certainly isn't yours or mine.


"Sex is a choice that the mother made. Just like getting an abortion is a choice."

It's not about choices it's about murder. Mom agreed to the odds of getting pregnant by engaging in intercourse. Abortion is the equivalent for asking for your money back because the roulette wheel didn't work out in your favor. Except instead of money, your murdering a child.


That is a perfectly fine opinion to have, except the mother in this case will be getting the abortion regardless. So we owe it to her to make it safe for her.

You still haven't addressed the point about all those children that WEREN'T aborted that are now awaiting foster care from parents looking to adopt. If we make abortion illegal, do you think that number will go down or up? Are you willing to take one of those children in if you make abortion illegal?


So because she may rob the casino to get her money back, we should force the casino to give her her money back...?



posted on Dec, 8 2014 @ 01:19 PM
link   

originally posted by: Dfairlite

originally posted by: Krazysh0t

originally posted by: Dfairlite

originally posted by: Krazysh0t

originally posted by: Dfairlite

originally posted by: Krazysh0t
a reply to: Dfairlite

You are grasping at straws here with your argument. If you cannot see the difference between a baby being breast fed and a fetus literally growing inside a mother's womb, you have a LONG way to go in your education of human anatomy.


Tell, me, why is that fetus growing inside that womb? Did it just happen!? Or was it the result of a choice?


Changing your argument after your first one fell flat on its face I see. I can play this game all day.

Sex is a choice that the mother made. Just like getting an abortion is a choice. The mother CAN be pro-choice and CHOOSE to not have an abortion because she personally doesn't believe in getting them.

If she does go through with the abortion, well the mental anguish that she must go through is hers and hers alone (and maybe her gods). It certainly isn't yours or mine.


"Sex is a choice that the mother made. Just like getting an abortion is a choice."

It's not about choices it's about murder. Mom agreed to the odds of getting pregnant by engaging in intercourse. Abortion is the equivalent for asking for your money back because the roulette wheel didn't work out in your favor. Except instead of money, your murdering a child.


That is a perfectly fine opinion to have, except the mother in this case will be getting the abortion regardless. So we owe it to her to make it safe for her.

You still haven't addressed the point about all those children that WEREN'T aborted that are now awaiting foster care from parents looking to adopt. If we make abortion illegal, do you think that number will go down or up? Are you willing to take one of those children in if you make abortion illegal?


So because she may rob the casino to get her money back, we should force the casino to give her her money back...?


No see, I answered your question. Now it is your turn to answer my follow up question. I'll repeat it again for you:
If we make abortion illegal, do you think that number will go down or up? Are you willing to take one of those children in if you make abortion illegal?



posted on Dec, 8 2014 @ 01:19 PM
link   

originally posted by: Dfairlite

originally posted by: Krazysh0t

originally posted by: Dfairlite

originally posted by: Krazysh0t

originally posted by: Dfairlite

originally posted by: Krazysh0t
a reply to: Dfairlite

You are grasping at straws here with your argument. If you cannot see the difference between a baby being breast fed and a fetus literally growing inside a mother's womb, you have a LONG way to go in your education of human anatomy.


Tell, me, why is that fetus growing inside that womb? Did it just happen!? Or was it the result of a choice?


Changing your argument after your first one fell flat on its face I see. I can play this game all day.

Sex is a choice that the mother made. Just like getting an abortion is a choice. The mother CAN be pro-choice and CHOOSE to not have an abortion because she personally doesn't believe in getting them.

If she does go through with the abortion, well the mental anguish that she must go through is hers and hers alone (and maybe her gods). It certainly isn't yours or mine.


"Sex is a choice that the mother made. Just like getting an abortion is a choice."

It's not about choices it's about murder. Mom agreed to the odds of getting pregnant by engaging in intercourse. Abortion is the equivalent for asking for your money back because the roulette wheel didn't work out in your favor. Except instead of money, your murdering a child.


That is a perfectly fine opinion to have, except the mother in this case will be getting the abortion regardless. So we owe it to her to make it safe for her.

You still haven't addressed the point about all those children that WEREN'T aborted that are now awaiting foster care from parents looking to adopt. If we make abortion illegal, do you think that number will go down or up? Are you willing to take one of those children in if you make abortion illegal?


So because she may rob the casino to get her money back, we should force the casino to give her her money back...?



Your comparisons are not good comparisons. What are you, twelve?



new topics

top topics



 
25
<< 9  10  11    13  14  15 >>

log in

join