It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Killing the Infants.

page: 1
6
<<   2 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Dec, 2 2014 @ 05:06 PM
link   
I read an article that was written by one of my dear friends, about vaccinations. With the author's permission, I would mike to hear what other people think. Note, the author does have a background in medical training, and did give permission to add parts of his article.




Our children get exposed to their first antibiotic before they are one hour old. Doctors wash out the infant’s eyes with antibiotics. They use to do this with Silver Nitrate. They do this just in case the mother was exposed to some kind of environmental disease, but instead of checking whether or not the mother falls in that category, they just wash out the eyes of every newborn baby.

I know that at this stage, you are wondering three things. What is Silver nitrate, why is this done, and why in the eyes?

SILVER NITRATE

What was Silver Nitrate used for and what makes this Compound dangerous? And what are the Antibiotics of today used for when washing out the eyes of the newborns?

As a precaution, most newborn’s eyes are treated with silver nitrate and/or antibiotic ointments, to make sure any possible infections, like conjunctivitis, or more popularly known as Pink Eye, are stopped before they can cause damage. During the birth posses, if a baby’s eyes or face come in contact with the mother, who is exposed to a bacterial infection, can obtain the same infection and can show up as Pink Eye. This is the same when the mother was/is infected with a Sexual Transmitted disease like Gonorrhea or Chlamydia, which can also be passed along to the baby. The strange part is, instead of just testing the mother for all the wearable diseases and infections, they just wash out the eyes of all newborn babies. This all sound like a good thing, but there is some dangers surrounding this procedure. The dangers of Silver Nitrate are that this can irritate the cornea of the newborn and lead to progressive eye damage. In some cases, this cause of prevention can do more damage to the eyes than the initial disease.

But are there any fewer problems with Antibiotics than with Silver Nitrate? In the wide picture, Antibiotics is a lot less dangerous because the specific Antibiotics has been created and perfected to do this job as well as possible with as few as possible side effects. But there is still a chance of post-treatment diseases that can harm the baby over the long term.

Vaccinations

That was just one of the few dangers the newborn face right after being born. The other dangerous factor is one that has been promoted by almost every radio and television station, and they tell you that this is the best thing to do. And this problem is vaccinations. Almost every doctor will tell you to vaccinate your child, whether he/she is a day, month or year old.

The problem is that your child was and will be injected with a foreign substance before being a day old. They say this is to build up an immune system for the baby, to help the newborn’s immune bodies to grow, making the baby less likely to get sick later on in his young life. This may be true, but as we all know, a lot of people get sick from the very medication that is supposed to make you better.

There are three components that make the vaccination dangerous to a newborn, and to every other person that gets one. The three components are Aluminium, Mercury and Formaldehyde. Yes, this is what is in the vaccinations that almost every doctor insists you should give your child. Let’s look at the substances at an individual level, one by one.

Aluminium

First off, let’s look at Aluminium. Aluminium is used in many household items like Soda Cans, tinfoil, aluminium cooking utensils and lots of other items we use every day. As used in this wide spectrum of items, the aluminium is virtually harmless, because of two factors.
The first factor is that any trace amount of Aluminium molecular concentration that gets absorbed by our food is picked up by your body. The inside of our digestive system is lined with Lymphatic tissue that was designed to get rid of such harmful substances in your body.

The Lymphatic tissue is like a sheet of immune cells that will detect harmful substances and destroy them before they can cause harm to any part of the body. But this only applies if the Aluminium is taken in by a normal means, like through the nose of digestive system.
The second factor is that if Aluminium is taken up through your skin, it will not pose a threat. Antiperspirant spry or role-on contains Aluminium Chlorohydrate. But even the trace amounts of Aluminium are not high enough to cause harm to the body. The problem comes in when you bypass the immune systems by injecting this harmful, and potential deadly substance directly into the bloodstream. By injecting something like Aluminium directly into the bloodstream, the substance goes through the howl body in less than an hour, causing damage to all your internal organs.

Research has shown that people with Alzheimer’s has a much higher Aluminium count in their bodies. After the discovery, they began searching for the reason to this strange finding. First off, the biggest concern was that it could have come from Aluminium pans. After further testing, they found that when the pan, or any other cooking utensil was heated up, the aluminium heats up, and releases a small amount of aluminium molecules that gets absorbed into the food. But after the patient digests the food, the Lymphatic tissue surrounding the inner walls of the digestive tract absorbs and destroys the particles before it can be taken into the bloodstream. After an in-depth research, the method of cooking in aluminium utensils was rolled out as one of the reasons for the high percentage of Aluminium in Alzheimer patients.

The next concern was the antiperspirant, but as stated earlier, there is not enough Aluminium that gets absorbed through the skill to pose any treat. The tested all kinds of everyday methods of exposure to Aluminium to the human body, but did not find the problem. Further studies shown that in the first two years of a baby’s life, he/she gets injected with Aluminium, by means of Vaccinations, fifteen times. In some people this high concentration of Aluminium gets flushed out of the bloodstream gradually over the following years, but in a small percentage of cases, the toxic metal stays in the blood, and just gets more through the passing of years, that will eventfully cause damage as a disease like Alzheimer’s.

This is just one of the many dangers of just the Aluminium compound found in vaccinations, and Alzheimer’s is just one of the many diseases caused by a high level of Aluminium. So how can this toxic metal found in vaccinations be any good to the human body, and at the age of one hour old?




posted on Dec, 2 2014 @ 05:07 PM
link   



Mercury

The next toxic element contained within Vaccinations is Mercury. The most well known disease caused by prolonged exposure to Mercury, or its compounds, is Mercury poisoning, better known in the Medical field as Hydrargyria or Mercurialism. This disease can be caused by a wide spectrum of methods. One of the causes is tooth fillings, which contains Mercury. Mercury has already been linked to other diseases like Attention Deficit Disorder (ADD/ADHD) and Autism. And this is just three of the diseases which are caused by Mercury injected into the bloodstream in the first hours of an infant’s life. We are insisting on injecting highly toxic metals into our children right after they get born, which is one of the leading factors of deadly diseases, illnesses and Sudden Infant Deaths, also known as SIDS.

In both ADD and Autism, it is the brain itself that has been damaged by toxic substances. Research done on children who suffer from ADD/ADHD has shown that there is a general reduction of brain volume with a proportionally greater reduction within the size of the left-sided Prefrontal cortex, which controls complex cognitive behaviours, correct social behaviours, personality expression and decision making.

This is the same with Autism, which is caused by damage to the cortex, which is the part of the brain which is largely responsible for very important brain functions which includes sensation, thought, memory, voluntary muscle movement and reasoning. How can a Vaccination be given to a baby it the risk of heart, long and brain damage is so high, and why is no one doing anything to try and warn the parents of the potential dangers?

Formaldehyde

That brings us to the third deadly toxin in the ‘life saving’ vaccination. Even just the name Formaldehyde can tell you that this is not something you would expect or want in your Vaccinations. Formaldehyde is most commonly used for a limited disinfectant, because of the high irritation to the nose and eyes. Too much exposure to formaldehyde can cause blindness. Even a very small percentage of formaldehyde in the air, for example 0.1 ppm, can cause skin irritation, burning sensations in the nose, eyes and throat, coughing, wheezing watery eyes and nausea. Recent studies done by the National Cancer Institute (NCI) which is a component of the National Institute of Health (NIH) has shown that high levels of formaldehyde exposure can, and did cause nasal cancer in rats. After this horrific finding, they started to seek answers to questions concerning certain types of cancers, in human patients, being linked to formaldehyde. Even today medical institutions have found a startling relation between cancer deaths and formaldehyde. Nasopharyngeal Cancer, Sinonasal Cancer, Occupations Cancer, Lung Cancer, Lymphatic Cancer, Hematopoietic Cancer and even brain tumors has been linked to high volumes of formaldehyde exposure.

Other studies has shown that formaldehyde, after being absorption, affect the Lymphatic and Hematopoietic systems, which is responsible for attacking and destroying toxic metals and chemicals when ingested. This is one of the reasons why people die from chemical exposures at a much faster rate than in the past. We, as parents, doctors and ever teachers are one of the reasons that the life expectancy of the human race of today has dropped with as much as 50 years, just by injecting this harmful, toxic and deadly chemical into the newborns.


edit on 2-12-2014 by IndependentAgent because: (no reason given)



posted on Dec, 2 2014 @ 05:09 PM
link   
Do you have a link to the article?



posted on Dec, 2 2014 @ 05:27 PM
link   
a reply to: IndependentAgent

You can add trace amounts of tree nut, bovine and chicken embryo proteins.

Don't look now, but persistent and life altering food allergies are going exponential.



posted on Dec, 2 2014 @ 09:35 PM
link   
a reply to: IndependentAgent

It cracks me up that not injecting foreign compounds into a new born baby is controversial in any sense.

To be flat out honest the level of "Scientific Studies" available to make the case of how it is the right thing to do is one of the causes of my mistrust of the entire scientific community. For them to be able to brainwash the "medical/scientific" authorities with this absurd notion shows to what extent certain interests have on the medical/scientific schools, it is quite remarkable indeed!

We are born with an immune system for a reason and being compromised immediately following birth is not one of them!
edit on America/ChicagoTuesdayAmerica/Chicago12America/Chicago1231pmTuesday9 by elementalgrove because: (no reason given)



posted on Dec, 2 2014 @ 09:44 PM
link   
Right you are OP and might I add that it is not only vaginal birth but also Cesarean section that receive the same Eye treatment as well. It is stupefying that these barbaric practices are allowed and encouraged. Lawd help us as we know not what we do...
edit on pm1231pmTue, 02 Dec 2014 21:45:19 -0600 by antar because: (no reason given)



posted on Dec, 2 2014 @ 10:09 PM
link   
a reply to: IndependentAgent




The three components are Aluminium, Mercury and Formaldehyde. Yes, this is what is in the vaccinations that almost every doctor insists you should give your child. Let’s look at the substances at an individual level, one by one.


Ugh here we go again. There's no point arguing. I think this is BS, but there is clearly no convincing the anti vaccination crowd. Everyone is a super scientist and all the professionals that actually dedicate years of their lives in school are apparently less informed than bored Mom's on the internet that spend a few hours reinforcing what they believe by clicking Facebook links.

I would love to see a link to this, and also have that link contain sources that aren't Natural News or some other highly suspect site.

I want to ask if this was translated to English. Was this translated to English? The spalling mistakes is epauling. Kind of hard to take someone serious when they don't proof read. Go ahead and correct me on my grammar and spelling, that's fine, I wrote this in a few seconds. I don't care, because I'm not trying super hard to disprove decades of proof and medical knowledge.
edit on 0220141220141 by Domo1 because: (no reason given)



posted on Dec, 2 2014 @ 10:54 PM
link   
a reply to: IndependentAgent

your " dear friend " is - to put it bluntly - an idiot


The problem comes in when you bypass the immune systems by injecting this harmful, and potential deadly substance directly into the bloodstream.


injection does NOT "bypass the imune system nor are vaccines " injected directly into the bloodstream "


We, as parents, doctors and ever teachers are one of the reasons that the life expectancy of the human race of today has dropped with as much as 50 years,


what planet is your " dear friend " from ????????????????????????


just by injecting this harmful, toxic and deadly chemical into the newborns.


quoted for hyperbolic hysteria

but seriously -

Q - what is the maximum formaldehyde load of a vaccine currently in use ????

A - 200 ug [ most contain far less - the 200ug is an adult does of a vaccine that infants would not recieve ]

Q2 - what is the natural formaldahyde level in blood ?

A2 - a newborn will alreadsy have 575 ~ 860 ug of formaldahyde in its bloodstream

Q3 - how much formaldehyde does the average diet contain

A3 - 20mg - thats 10 times the max vacine load - and you eat this every day

the anti vaxx scaremongering bull# is getting tiresome



posted on Dec, 2 2014 @ 11:15 PM
link   
a reply to: ignorant_ape

I'll see your formaldehyde and raise you aluminum:

Maximum dosage levels of aluminum as per the FDA:
8 pound, healthy baby: 18.16 mcg of aluminum
15 pound, healthy baby: 34.05 mcg of aluminum
30 pound, healthy toddler: 68.1 mcg of aluminum
50 pound, healthy child: 113 mcg of aluminum
150 pound adult: 340.5 mcg of aluminum
350 pound adult: 794.5 mcg of aluminum

Amounts used in routine vaccinations:
Hib (PedVaxHib brand only) – 225 mcg per shot
Hepatitis B – 250 mcg
DTaP – depending on the manufacturer, ranges from 170 to 625 mcg
Pneumococcus – 125 mcg
Hepatitis A – 250 mcg
HPV – 225 mcg
Pentacel (DTaP, HIB and Polio combo vaccine) – 330 mcg
Pediarix (DTaP, Hep B and Polio combo vaccine) – 850 mcg

Notice the HEP-B alone is 14 times the FDA approved levels.



posted on Dec, 2 2014 @ 11:22 PM
link   
a reply to: Domo1

This is what I've noticed about the pro-vaccine crowd. A lot of trivial complaining about things like spelling errors (even though you make a few and then recuse yourself), yet fail to offer any real scientific facts or cogent rebuttal. Or any rebuttal at all.

Oh right, you're not trying to disprove anything...you just want to complain so it's ok.



posted on Dec, 2 2014 @ 11:49 PM
link   
a reply to: ignorant_ape

Also, you act as though the pro-vaccination crowd doesn't do their fair share of fear mongering. "Herd immunity!" "Social responsibility!" "MEASLES!!!" "POLIO! Oh noooeeesss!!"



posted on Dec, 3 2014 @ 01:14 AM
link   

originally posted by: eriktheawful
Do you have a link to the article?


This article was not published online sorry.



posted on Dec, 3 2014 @ 03:28 AM
link   
a reply to: WordsAreAvenues

I'll see your ignorant scaremongering BS and raise you some facts and knowledge:

vec.chop.edu...


Given the quantities of aluminum we are exposed to on a daily basis, the quantity of aluminum in vaccines is miniscule. Aluminum-containing vaccines have been used for decades and have been given to over one billion people without problem. In spring 2000, the National Vaccine Program Office (NVPO) reviewed aluminum exposure through vaccines and determined that no changes to vaccine recommendations were needed based on aluminum content. The Global Advisory Committee on Vaccine Safety, part of the World Health Organization (WHO), has also reviewed studies and found no evidence of health risks that would require changes to vaccine policy.



posted on Dec, 3 2014 @ 03:52 AM
link   

Sudden-infant-death-syndrome (SIDS) has been reported following administration of vaccines containing diphtheria and tetanus toxoids and pertussis vaccine. The significance of these reports is not clear. It should be borne in mind that the three primary immunizing doses of these vaccines are usually administered to infants between the age of 2 and 6 months and that approximately 85% of SIDS cases occur in the period from 1 through 6 months of age with the peak incidence at age 2 to 4 months.



www.vaccineriskawareness.com...
edit on 3-12-2014 by IndependentAgent because: (no reason given)



posted on Dec, 3 2014 @ 08:44 AM
link   

originally posted by: IndependentAgent

originally posted by: eriktheawful
Do you have a link to the article?


This article was not published online sorry.


How convenient.
And I've noticed you haven't responded to any posts countering the tired, old nonsense you've regurgitated.

Exactly what aspect of medicine is your "friend" trained in?

This may be of interest to "him".
The Truth About the Evils of Vaccination



posted on Dec, 3 2014 @ 08:52 AM
link   

originally posted by: IndependentAgent


Sudden-infant-death-syndrome (SIDS) has been reported following administration of vaccines containing diphtheria and tetanus toxoids and pertussis vaccine. The significance of these reports is not clear. It should be borne in mind that the three primary immunizing doses of these vaccines are usually administered to infants between the age of 2 and 6 months and that approximately 85% of SIDS cases occur in the period from 1 through 6 months of age with the peak incidence at age 2 to 4 months.



www.vaccineriskawareness.com...


www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov...

This is a long article but here's the conclusion (this IS available online, with citations and references unlike the link you've provided).

"CONCLUSION

The evidence does not indicate a causal relation between DPT vaccine and SIDS. Studies showing a temporal relation between these events are consistent with the expected occurrence of SIDS over the age range in which DPT immunization typically occurs
.


You really should check facts before you post ill-informed hearsay on the internet.
You could harm someone.



posted on Dec, 3 2014 @ 08:52 AM
link   

originally posted by: Pardon?

originally posted by: IndependentAgent

originally posted by: eriktheawful
Do you have a link to the article?


This article was not published online sorry.


How convenient.
And I've noticed you haven't responded to any posts countering the tired, old nonsense you've regurgitated.

Exactly what aspect of medicine is your "friend" trained in?

This may be of interest to "him".
The Truth About the Evils of Vaccination


I do not respond because I have no formal training in medicine. I just thought this might make an interesting conversation for those you have knowledge and training in medicine, and maybe I could learn something.

He completed his Residency a while back.



posted on Dec, 3 2014 @ 08:54 AM
link   

originally posted by: WordsAreAvenues
a reply to: ignorant_ape

Also, you act as though the pro-vaccination crowd doesn't do their fair share of fear mongering. "Herd immunity!" "Social responsibility!" "MEASLES!!!" "POLIO! Oh noooeeesss!!"


It's only fear-mongering if you don't understand the meanings and benefits.
It's common sense to those who do.



posted on Dec, 3 2014 @ 08:59 AM
link   

originally posted by: IndependentAgent

originally posted by: Pardon?

originally posted by: IndependentAgent

originally posted by: eriktheawful
Do you have a link to the article?


This article was not published online sorry.


How convenient.
And I've noticed you haven't responded to any posts countering the tired, old nonsense you've regurgitated.

Exactly what aspect of medicine is your "friend" trained in?

This may be of interest to "him".
The Truth About the Evils of Vaccination


I do not respond because I have no formal training in medicine. I just thought this might make an interesting conversation for those you have knowledge and training in medicine, and maybe I could learn something.

He completed his Residency a while back.


His residency in what field?

And it seems strange that you're posting links from an anti-vax site as well as from what your "friend" wrote (somewhere...).
Don't you think?



posted on Dec, 3 2014 @ 09:22 AM
link   

originally posted by: Pardon?

originally posted by: IndependentAgent


Sudden-infant-death-syndrome (SIDS) has been reported following administration of vaccines containing diphtheria and tetanus toxoids and pertussis vaccine. The significance of these reports is not clear. It should be borne in mind that the three primary immunizing doses of these vaccines are usually administered to infants between the age of 2 and 6 months and that approximately 85% of SIDS cases occur in the period from 1 through 6 months of age with the peak incidence at age 2 to 4 months.



www.vaccineriskawareness.com...


www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov...

This is a long article but here's the conclusion (this IS available online, with citations and references unlike the link you've provided).

"CONCLUSION

The evidence does not indicate a causal relation between DPT vaccine and SIDS. Studies showing a temporal relation between these events are consistent with the expected occurrence of SIDS over the age range in which DPT immunization typically occurs
.


You really should check facts before you post ill-informed hearsay on the internet.
You could harm someone.


That study, or article, was done in 1991.

Lets look at a more recent report.

www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov...




top topics



 
6
<<   2 >>

log in

join