It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Barack Obama is spurring the riots in Ferguson and make no mistake Barack Obama is the Democratic Party. The rioting in Ferguson is an opportunity to distract the public from his unconstitutional amnesty, draconian climate change regulations, his fundamental transformation of our society, and to seize more control over local policing.
Barack Obama is preparing another Executive Order, one which is far less damaging and controversial than the one on amnesty. He is not going to stop the flow of funds and equipment from the Pentagon to the police but he is going to monitor the military equipment they receive.
The problem isn’t in the order, it’s in the task force he is forming on policing, which will focus on “combating crime while building trust in local law enforcement agencies”. Charles Ramsey, Philadelphia police commissioner, will head the panel.
Democratic Party Spurs Riots in Ferguson Because the End Justifies the Means
originally posted by: xuenchen
The problem isn’t in the order, it’s in the task force he is forming on policing, which will focus on “combating crime while building trust in local law enforcement agencies”. Charles Ramsey, Philadelphia police commissioner, will head the panel.
originally posted by: xuenchen
The problem isn’t in the order, it’s in the task force he is forming on policing, which will focus on “combating crime while building trust in local law enforcement agencies”. Charles Ramsey, Philadelphia police commissioner, will head the panel.
originally posted by: AgentShillington
Why is this bad?
Can anyone explain to me why any of this is bad?
Seriously, I come to ATS and laugh at the crazy stuff people say all the time, but I can almost always see why people are saying the things they are saying.
I can't wrap my head around someone having a problem with someone focusing on “combating crime while building trust in local law enforcement agencies”. Why exactly is this bad?
originally posted by: xuenchen
My take is this:
The power given could allow Federal micromanaging of Counties receiving the military equipment.
Just think. They will have full control of all the County level police authority.
Counties that have within them the largest cities that have the largest Democrat voting pockets.
Perfect compartmentalism.
More power than ever.
Everything else is window-dressing.
What more could they ask for?
originally posted by: CharlieSpeirs
Obama does something genuinely great...
Still gets bashed for it...
As the old saying goes, there is no pleasing some people...
originally posted by: xuenchen
a reply to: AgentShillington
My conclusions being partisan is because Obama and his Administration *IS* partisan.
originally posted by: AgentShillington
originally posted by: xuenchen
a reply to: AgentShillington
My conclusions being partisan is because Obama and his Administration *IS* partisan.
This is unreal.
You are blaming YOUR partisanship on Obama. You are literally blaming Obama for your inability to remain unbiased. It's like you believe everything is Obama's fault, including anything that might be your fault. It is very hard to take you seriously because of this.