It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Cop Caught on Video Groping Restrained Woman’s Breasts and Genitals, Woman Cries

page: 4
14
<< 1  2  3    5  6  7 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Nov, 30 2014 @ 04:45 PM
link   
a reply to: AugustusMasonicus




The incident took place when residents of Los Angeles gathered and protested against police on Saturday night.

Police often use what is called a “snatch and grab” maneuver on protesters.

This occurs when a group of officers targets a random protester from among the crowd, then swarms in, grabs the protester, and places him or her under arrest in front of everybody.


.....
edit on 11/30/2014 by onequestion because: (no reason given)




posted on Nov, 30 2014 @ 04:47 PM
link   
a reply to: onequestion

Maybe that wasnt good enough.

From the video uploader.




After purposely leading protestors into the street on two occasions, LAPD officers kettled and detained over a hundred marchers. Each detainee was zip-tide and asked various questions such "where do you live", "where did you grown up", and "what is your social security number". All of which, are questions detainees are not required to answer in the state of California. The information collected by LAPD is being databased, and on some occasions it's shared with the FBI and other law enforcement agencies. The woman in this video was subjected to an aggressive search of her body that included the touching of her breasts and vagina. The officer claimed she needed to search for weapons. The woman was eventually lead away toward the direction of the paddy wagon.



posted on Nov, 30 2014 @ 04:47 PM
link   

originally posted by: onequestion
a reply to: AugustusMasonicus

I have a source and a video to support my post.


Your "source" is a anonymous "hate the police" blog, your video does not support your claims at all.


So far.. non of your arguments would be valid for court. You would lose.


So you think a anonymous "hate the police" blog would be valid in court, or a misnamed video would be valid?
edit on 30-11-2014 by hellobruce because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 30 2014 @ 04:47 PM
link   
a reply to: onequestion

That is not evidence. That is the site owner pointing out what he feels is 'typical' police tactics in the area and inferring that this is what transpired despite the lack of video evidence to support him.

Is there a video of her being pulled randomly out of the protest? If no, then how can anyone say for certain what occurred prior to the filming?



posted on Nov, 30 2014 @ 04:47 PM
link   

originally posted by: onequestion
a reply to: AugustusMasonicus

Did you read the article?


against my better judgement i just did..
the source being filmingcops.com right away turns me off.

you keep saying she committed no crime but you dont know.
all you know is what this lame ass filmingcops.com site tells you...



posted on Nov, 30 2014 @ 04:48 PM
link   

originally posted by: onequestion
a reply to: projectbane

No dude...

I am perfectly coherent in my responses and they are absolutely valid.

The police cannot in America just pull you out of a protest for no reason, absolutely no reason and walk up behind you and start grabbing your private parts before they release you.



What are YOU not understanding? The video shows this woman already restrained. Prior to the commencement of the video. All things being equal she was restrained for something deemed against the law. So with that in mind she has MAYBE provided the officer with a reason to do an OVER THE CLOTHES pat down. BY a FEMALE officer as well.

You are inventing things that we have no proof over. What happened before the video started is speculation. HOW do YOU know she was peacefully protesting???? where you there? DO we have video of that? NO.

So, sorry but you are not being clever. You are being very biased.



posted on Nov, 30 2014 @ 04:49 PM
link   
a reply to: Grovit

No, i read what the uploader post in the video.

You know the person who made the video? Did you read it?



posted on Nov, 30 2014 @ 04:49 PM
link   

originally posted by: onequestion
a reply to: AugustusMasonicus




The incident took place when residents of Los Angeles gathered and protested against police on Saturday night.

Police often use what is called a “snatch and grab” maneuver on protesters.

This occurs when a group of officers targets a random protester from among the crowd, then swarms in, grabs the protester, and places him or her under arrest in front of everybody.


.....


says the filmingcops.com web master

wonder if that site has an agenda



posted on Nov, 30 2014 @ 04:49 PM
link   

originally posted by: onequestion
You know the person who made the video?


No, and I would wager neither do you.



posted on Nov, 30 2014 @ 04:49 PM
link   
 


off-topic post removed to prevent thread-drift


 



posted on Nov, 30 2014 @ 04:50 PM
link   
a reply to: Grovit

The website doesnt matter.

But go ahead keep trying to pin something down.

hah.



posted on Nov, 30 2014 @ 04:51 PM
link   

originally posted by: onequestion
The police cannot in America just pull you out of a protest for no reason, absolutely no reason]


How do you know that is what happened? You seem to have zero evidence for your silly claims!



posted on Nov, 30 2014 @ 04:51 PM
link   

originally posted by: onequestion


No, i read what the uploader post in the video.




oh....i didnt know you read it straight from the person who uploaded the video
well it must have happened exactly how he claims
youtube is all about truth and fact

i recant everything i have said so far in this threat and defer to you..



posted on Nov, 30 2014 @ 04:51 PM
link   
a reply to: hellobruce

Oh my god.



posted on Nov, 30 2014 @ 04:52 PM
link   
a reply to: onequestion
I love how we have gotten all these brand new amiracan types on ATS, the kind that love seeing people placed in these situtations and think thats how its done round here.
kind of reminds me of, of, Liveleaks..yeah



posted on Nov, 30 2014 @ 04:52 PM
link   
a reply to: Grovit

Good you finally make sense.

Sorry but you have no evidence to support your assumption whereas i have clear video evidence.

Did you look in the background of the video? did you see what was happening?

I have video evidence and witness testimony. you have an assumption. Thanks.

Sorry but if i was a defense attorney i would beat you in court.
edit on 11/30/2014 by onequestion because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 30 2014 @ 04:53 PM
link   

originally posted by: onequestion

The website doesnt matter.



hah.


really...
see cause i thought it did matter...
you know, legit sources and all...



posted on Nov, 30 2014 @ 04:53 PM
link   

originally posted by: onequestion
a reply to: hellobruce

Oh my god.


Wrong again, I am not your god.

Just someone who points out your mistakes, like the video on searches having nothing at all to do with this thread.


edit on 30-11-2014 by hellobruce because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 30 2014 @ 04:54 PM
link   
a reply to: Grovit

Video evidence, and witness testimony.

What do you have to support your point of view?

Nothing.



posted on Nov, 30 2014 @ 04:54 PM
link   

originally posted by: AgentSmith
a reply to: onequestion

You do realise it is a female officer carrying out the search?


So what? So because it's a same-sex officer, it's ok for that officer to molest this woman? What, is it also ok for men in the military to be raped by other men, because they're the same sex?
Sexual assault is sexual assault, it doesn't matter one bit what the sexes involved are.




top topics



 
14
<< 1  2  3    5  6  7 >>

log in

join