It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
'Shame on the New York Times,' bellowed a guest on Sean Hannity's radio show last night after the venerable newspaper printed the home address of Ferguson police officer Darren Wilson.
The details were revealed in a news report on Officer Wilson's marriage to another police officer last month, less than ten weeks after he shot unarmed Michael Brown six times in a Ferguson street.
The address was included in a report on Officer Brown's marriage to Barbara Spradling, a fellow officer in the Ferguson Police Department.
originally posted by: IAMTAT
What did they (NYT) hope would be gained by publishing officer Wilson's home address in the midst of this volatile situation?
IMO, the answer could ONLY have been to maliciously assure that those seeking to harm Wilson, would know exactly where to go in order to harass and/or take bloody vengeance upon he and his family.
I dont have a feeling about it either way, so Im not sure what you are hoping for.
originally posted by: IAMTAT
originally posted by: captaintyinknots
As if he's still there anyway.
Come on now.
I hope that doesn't mean you think that it's okay.
Breitbart News will not link the story or give out the specific information, but the New York Times had no qualms whatsoever about publishing almost all the information needed for Officer Darren Wilson's enemies to track him and his wife down at home:
Officer Wilson and [his wife] own a home together on XXXXXXX Lane in XXXXXXXXXX, Mo., a St. Louis suburb about a half-hour drive from Ferguson.
This malicious move by the New York Times has not gone unnoticed by Ferguson's protesters:
But printing his street name in the nation’s most influential newspaper on the day the grand jury is expected to hand up a decision on the indictment could reignite interest in -- and awareness of -- the location, and some critics worry that it could result in protesters descending on his home. Slate even went a step further than the Times, publishing an article featuring a photo of the modest, red-brick house on Monday.
A number of Twitter users -- some of whom have identified themselves as planning to protest the grand jury decision -- have tweeted the location of Wilson’s home as they gear up for rallies. The house number was not printed in the Times, but the street in the St. Louis suburb of Crestwood where it sits is only about two blocks long, and the house number can be easily located via online sources using only the street name and Wilson’s name.
This type of behavior is nothing new from our elite media. When the media was pulling out the stops to electronically lynch George Zimmerman like they are Wilson, CNN broadcast Zimmerman's Social Security number to the world.
When the media wants you destroyed they want you destroyed.
originally posted by: IntastellaBurst
It appears this address was also listed for a costume supply company.
Unfortunately they only ever made one costume, ghosts.
Im glad to see the ole chap is resourcful enough to recycle his old " uniforms" .