It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
WRONG.
Originally posted by Murcielago
As you know ramjets can take-off on a normal runway (unlike a scram-jet), This aircraft would have some amazing capabilities.
Originally posted by Murcielago
I ask this because I found a US patent # 6,672,068 B1 that says if you change the config of the engine and intake in-flight then you would be able to go up to Mach 12! As you know ramjets can take-off on a normal runway (unlike a scram-jet), This aircraft would have some amazing capabilities.
Originally posted by Dima
..but they have found a way around this problem as well, although its classified
here's a link of a short description of each
www.area51zone.com...
Originally posted by Murcielago
New question: What is the difference between a ramjet and a scram-jet? and please dont tell me that the only difference is its name changes once its capable of reaching mach 5.
Originally posted by Dima
but, a brand-new problem was created, something to deal with air mixing with the fuel, which results in a spark, and the eventual explosion of the aircraft...
Yeah, fact that something is patented in US doesn't guarantee anything.
Originally posted by cmdrkeenkid
Don't believe everything you read... That may have not been tested yet, so very well may be false.
Originally posted by roniii259
My question is, how will a scramjet get up to the optimum point where it can start? the x-43 used a pegasus rocket to get to its required altitude and velocity , but on an operational plane this would negate the reasons for choosing the Scram jet in the first place. Would an operational craft use a urboRamjet/scramjet combonation where the craft usses two of each kind and certain engines are stopped or started during various phases of the flight?
Originally posted by otlg27
hard to do in ascii text...