It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Sick Liberal Sex Education with Taxpayer Money!

page: 1
18
<<   2  3  4 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Nov, 21 2014 @ 04:30 PM
link   
Teaching children as young as 11 on how to use porn, program sex avatars, and do very inappropriate things.

Watch the news video. This is sick, inappropriate, and completely over the line.


Sex Ed Conference Touts Alternatives: Bathe, Shave And Role-Play Together
seattle.cbslocal.com...



edit on 21-11-2014 by infolurker because: (no reason given)




posted on Nov, 21 2014 @ 04:34 PM
link   
I read it too and I'm disgusted.

Just like Brave New World. Introduce people to sex at a young age, Pavlovian techniques.



posted on Nov, 21 2014 @ 04:34 PM
link   
I can see their logic but it's WAY off.


The pamphlets handed out at the conference suggest other ways students can engage in intimate activities without having intercourse, including bathing together, shaving each other, wearing each other’s underwear, role playing, buying an extra-large pair of pajama bottoms to sleep in together, lap dances and strip teases.


Really? Sounds like foreplay to me. Back to the drawing board.



posted on Nov, 21 2014 @ 04:37 PM
link   
a reply to: intrepid

Watch the Newscast video. The story notes are nothing compared to the newscast which is much more in depth. They talk about how people use Meth to have lots of sex with multiple partners and much more.




edit on 21-11-2014 by infolurker because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 21 2014 @ 04:46 PM
link   

originally posted by: Yeahkeepwatchingme
I read it too and I'm disgusted.

Just like Brave New World. Introduce people to sex at a young age, Pavlovian techniques.


Huxley in Brave New World was making the point that humans are PREDISPOSED AND HARDWIRED for sex even from birth. Did you ever Change a diaper? Where does the child's hand go? That ain't the debbil making it feel good to manipulate the genitals...

Huxley's children in Brave New World were allowed to engage in "erotic play" not coached in it or shamed for what came naturally. Before the harsh grouping into social hierarchies and the stigmas attached to each one.
edit on 21-11-2014 by the owlbear because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 21 2014 @ 04:46 PM
link   

originally posted by: infolurker
a reply to: intrepid

Watch the Newscast video. The story notes are nothing compared to the newscast which is much more in depth. They talk about how people use Meth to have lots of sex with multiple partners and much more.


No. It was the same. Their goal is to cut down on STI's and teen pregnancy but their methods are TOTALLY whack. They would promote more teen sex.



posted on Nov, 21 2014 @ 04:48 PM
link   

originally posted by: the owlbear

originally posted by: Yeahkeepwatchingme
I read it too and I'm disgusted.

Just like Brave New World. Introduce people to sex at a young age, Pavlovian techniques.


Huxley in Brave New World was making the point that humans are PREDISPOSED AND HARDWIRED for sex even from birth. Did you ever Change a diaper? Where does the child's hand go? That ain't the debbil making it feel good to manipulate the genitals...


No but it sure feels good getting crap off of your ass.


+1 more 
posted on Nov, 21 2014 @ 04:50 PM
link   
a reply to: infolurker

Over reacting much? It is a "conference" about alternative 'sex ed' practices - NOT taypayer money paying for anything nor a 'liberal' agenda item.

Learn some critical listening, reading and thinking skills before spouting this divel.



posted on Nov, 21 2014 @ 04:54 PM
link   

originally posted by: FyreByrd
a reply to: infolurker

Over reacting much? It is a "conference" about alternative 'sex ed' practices - NOT taypayer money paying for anything nor a 'liberal' agenda item.

Learn some critical listening, reading and thinking skills before spouting this divel.



You obviously did not watch the newscast. Two day field trip for middle and high school students paid with taxpayer funds.
edit on 21-11-2014 by infolurker because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 21 2014 @ 04:56 PM
link   

originally posted by: intrepid

originally posted by: the owlbear

originally posted by: Yeahkeepwatchingme
I read it too and I'm disgusted.

Just like Brave New World. Introduce people to sex at a young age, Pavlovian techniques.


Huxley in Brave New World was making the point that humans are PREDISPOSED AND HARDWIRED for sex even from birth. Did you ever Change a diaper? Where does the child's hand go? That ain't the debbil making it feel good to manipulate the genitals...


No but it sure feels good getting crap off of your ass.


Ah, one of my favorite Canuckistanians...
you almost made me lose beer.

I thought liberals wanted protected sex, no kids.
Non-liberals want no sex (which isn't a reality as I have stated).

I'm confused. And I'm not going to watch the video because according to the above, it will give me too many ideas and we have a kid to get to bed first...



posted on Nov, 21 2014 @ 05:01 PM
link   
a reply to: the owlbear

I'm just missing the logic. Less teen pregnancy and disease are excellent goals. The method leaves much to be desired.



posted on Nov, 21 2014 @ 05:12 PM
link   

originally posted by: [post=18686785]the owlbear

Huxley in Brave New World was making the point that humans are PREDISPOSED AND HARDWIRED for sex even from birth. Did you ever Change a diaper? Where does the child's hand go? That ain't the debbil making it feel good to manipulate the genitals...


Yeah I have changed probably thousands of diapers, both boys and girls. I have 5 children and now 4 grand children.
Sometimes they reach down there but most times not. They don't grab their genitals anymore than they grab any other part of their body.

[snipped]

98% of the time when you have to touch their genitals to clean them off before a new diaper they cry or don't want you touching them there. Wonder why that is? Could that be the "debbil" making them feel uncomfortable touching them there?
edit on Fri Nov 21 2014 by DontTreadOnMe because: remark directed at member removed



posted on Nov, 21 2014 @ 05:23 PM
link   
a reply to: the owlbear

What does the debbil have to do with this?



posted on Nov, 21 2014 @ 05:40 PM
link   
Seems like it's teaching kids fun, healthy ways to enjoy sex without having intercourse - giving kids alternatives to intercourse... They're going to have sex anyway. Would you rather them have uneducated sex? Isn't it better if they avoid intercourse and therefore avoid pregnancy and STDs?

Intrepid, what would be a better method?



posted on Nov, 21 2014 @ 05:42 PM
link   
I was home schooled and I remember a friend telling me that their public school taught them that viruses pass right through condoms.

Der.

Either way, I think sex education should be putting kids in front of a Mayo clinic ish website and them having the choice of either looking through the various information or sitting bored for two hours. Enough of this nonsense. Kids and teens are perfectly capable of looking up topics relevant to them. Then have a quiz at the bottom in regard to various health risks and information and if they get 99 out of 100 they have to start over again. This would include information on where to go if a family member etc. is abusing you and where to report it. That would be real sex education, not some idiotic history teacher with no training teaching you that viruses pass through condoms.

It's sad and even adults don't know about their bodies half the time. I know more about risks and the way the body works than many of the women I know and I am a lesbian.



posted on Nov, 21 2014 @ 05:51 PM
link   

originally posted by: Benevolent Heretic
Intrepid, what would be a better method?


Well intimate, physical contact is NOT what I would recommend for adolescents. Like I said.... that's foreplay. Can't you see it? "It's OK baby. This is how they taught us how to do it. Relax." Their hormones are raging enough as it is without throwing more confusion into the mix.



posted on Nov, 21 2014 @ 05:52 PM
link   

originally posted by: Benevolent Heretic
Seems like it's teaching kids fun, healthy ways to enjoy sex without having intercourse - giving kids alternatives to intercourse... They're going to have sex anyway. Would you rather them have uneducated sex? Isn't it better if they avoid intercourse and therefore avoid pregnancy and STDs?

Intrepid, what would be a better method?


Controversy is surrounding a sex education conference in Oregon as the event has hosted students as young as 11 years old.


The pamphlets handed out at the conference suggest other ways students can engage in intimate activities without having intercourse, including bathing together, shaving each other, wearing each other’s underwear, role playing, buying an extra-large pair of pajama bottoms to sleep in together, lap dances and strip teases.
---------------

im all for teaching younger people to enjoy each other without having sex but not at 11 years old and not using these methods.

btw, bh....how do you enjoy sex without intercourse?
none of those methods talked about are sex...

i mean there is 'sex'..you know, penetration and there is oral sex..you know....oral

what kind of sex is 2 people stuffed inside pajamas? what kind of sex is shaving each other?

i dont follow



posted on Nov, 21 2014 @ 05:53 PM
link   
a reply to: intrepid

exactly.
a striptease followed by mutual shaving followed by jumping into a pair of jammies together is foreplay..

actually sounds like an awesome time....

scuse me.....gotta go get the wife



posted on Nov, 21 2014 @ 05:59 PM
link   

originally posted by: intrepid

originally posted by: Benevolent Heretic
Intrepid, what would be a better method?


Well intimate, physical contact is NOT what I would recommend for adolescents. Like I said.... that's foreplay. Can't you see it? "It's OK baby. This is how they taught us how to do it. Relax." Their hormones are raging enough as it is without throwing more confusion into the mix.


Well if I remember correctly, many teen males wouldn't make it much past the foreplay stage, before they were "done".



posted on Nov, 21 2014 @ 06:14 PM
link   
a reply to: infolurker

If you "use porn" then you are doing it completely wrong. Porn is viewed.

Did anyone notice that like 90% of the suggestions were from the same pamphlet that looks like it was put together by some high school group? Anyone know where this pamphlet came from? I think that would interesting to know. Pajamas, shave together, role play, etc etc, all in the same pamphlet as is the bit about meth.

Oh, and about that. The interviewed person flat out lies and the "reporter" goes right along with it. If you pause the video, it does not as is purported encourage the use of meth. This is what it says after the prelude about what meth is:

"can quickly become an addiction. It may seem like the solution to all problems, but meth can lead to severe mental and physical exhaustion, depression, extended psychosis, neurological damage, liver & kidney damage, as well as other health related issues..."

Seems like some very sensationalized "reporting" that is extremely low on informational content by design.

Drugs and sex are things that people typically become exposed to as adolescents and just like the War on Drugs is an abysmal failure (Just Say "No!" — talk about wasted tax dollars), so are abstinence-only initiatives. The goal should be to mitigate the risks as that's the most pragmatic approach.
edit on 2014-11-21 by theantediluvian because: (no reason given)




top topics



 
18
<<   2  3  4 >>

log in

join