Photograph Number 2 is incorrect.
Not only that - a lot of the stuff was incorrect. The picture of 'Titanic' was not a picture of Titanic, for example, but of the sister ship, RMS
The Nagasaki survivor would have died, if the story about atom bombs, radiation, etc. was true (and the picture is proof that the whole 'radiation is
deadly and melts your eyes' stuff was invented much later, when people started wondering why nuclear bombs are not used in the Vietnam war. Eyes don't
As to the whole point and claim of the topic and the topic in the site - nope, they didn't change anything. They only reinforced 'how I see the past'
(not that 'the past' can be immediately 'seen' anyway without a time machine or existence in a higher plane than what most of the Terran physical
plane-denizens are usually used to).
The roman sun goddess-statue is still hideous and looks like elvis, and the masonic oligarchs had too much power even a really long time ago.
What were these photos supposed to change?
Funnily, some of the sixties photos are of much worse quality (and resolution) than the photos from 1800s..
(and some of the photos are grossly distorted because of forced aspect ratio, and a lot of them are in really low resolution and awful quality - not
that much could be expected as far as photo quality from old pictures, but why do the bad quality pictures always get scanned with such a low
resolution, too? It's like adding insult to injury)
Seems very filipino-centric stuff - they are very emotional and a bit childish people, from what I know. I mean, the site creators do not take into
account that all photos can always be captured, saved, transferred, so 'preventing right-click' is only a useless nuisance. They also didn't realize
internet is international, not only filipinos can view the 'photos will change how you see' collection, but anyone on the planet with an internet
connection can. So when they say "our president" or "our leader" or whatever, it sounds pretty thoughtless.
Also, when they say that churchill was 'handsome' in his youth, they must be joking. He looks like a cross between Mr. Bean and the big-eared bloke
from 'Men Behaving Badly'.
These 'royalty' types parading in their expensive, militaristic, elitist 'uniforms' make me sick. But all the site creators see is 'handsomeness'..
give me a break.
Not to mention that Churchill was a cruel warmonger that didn't want German to have a good, working economy, and according to certain sources,
actually WANTED a war, and STARTED it. Perhaps he is one of TPTB, for no real 'leader' of a country could have ever made such diabolical plans when it
comes to other countries... they would only have worried about the welfare of the people in their own countries. But Churchill was glad to let the
british be butchered by germans, and vice versa, as long as he got his lust for power and control satisfied - he was clearly expressing and working
for an agenda, and if not his own, then.. we probably all know, whose.
So to call this ugly, cruel murderer and warmonger madman 'handsome' is just an atrocity in itself - especially, because he is ugly as sin. Both
inside and out.
Btw, why was it important for us to see / know the color of Hitler's eyes? Why so many photos of Hitler? Why ANY photos of Hitler? Do filipinos or at
least the control freaks that created that site (no right-click allowed, sheesh - it can be easily circumvented, but it's needless work and very, very
annoying) secretly admire / worship Hitler and the nazi ideology?
Besides, it said the photo is COLORIZED, so they are not the 'true color' of his eyes. If it's colorized, it means that color was added later on, and
that color could have come from a paint bucket for all we know - and the true color could have been something else very easily. Even camera does lie
(colors are not necessarily the same in a photo as they are in real life, as photographers know - all kinds of things affect this, from lighting to
the actual hue that's photographed - 24 bits really do not take you very far when you want to capture the real colors of the physical reality, they
offer only 256 different brightnesses, after all), let alone some paid painter!
"Aber mein Führer, your eyes are brown!"
"Just paint them blue, schnell! I want to appear Aryan in the photo!"
"Javohl, mein Führer! Danke schön!"
Also, I really hate topics that make a bold claim about "YOU", when they don't really know "YOU" at all. "This will change how you think about this"
or "10 Secrets you didn't know about (topic)", or whatever.
And lastly, the whole "(number) these that will (do this to you)" format is so childish, reeks of advertising and the modern "quick facts on a silver
platter, please, because I don't want to try to do actual thinking for myself"-attitude of the morons, and the dumbing of the masses, and I THOROUGHLY
I wish google would stop giving me those 'claims that begin with a number' instead of real facts and the truth, and deeply involved explanations that
can be multiple pages long.
I wish someone in a CONSPIRACY CONVERSATION FORUM would at least rise an eyebrow when stuff like this is shoved down our throats, but.. oh well. I
live in the wrong world, on the wrong planet, and it's all my own fault, so.. never mind.
edit on 22-11-2014 by Shoujikina because: (no reason given)