posted on Nov, 23 2014 @ 07:21 AM
Saying I don't care only means that I would prefer that it would warm up but in my neck of the woods it's cold as usual . The data issue and the
papers produced is only a game of moving the pea under a shell . The Rockefeller's we very heavily invested in fossil fuels for many years and also
sponsoring what can only be described as the pro-agw side so if big oil does happen to support some of the skeptic side ,so what . David (fruit fly)
Suzuki is pro-agw and he is in bed with big oil . So what . Oh and the Rockefeller's just recently moved away from fossil fuels in their investments
. Funny that as the bottom seems to be falling out of the prices now . You would almost think they had the inside scoop on the way the future is going
to go ,or they are going to make it go that way .
Climate Audit does a good job at looking at some of the papers being produced and finding errors .In fact they bring out some very questionable
methods into the light . This latest of a series is worth noting because a paper produced in 2012 was published then pulled from the journal and has
been under review for 2 years .The same author reproduced another paper that looks like the first but had to get out because it was already used in
the IPCC's report . If what has been found to be true then the IPCC doesn't care about quality or methods but only needs papers to back up what they
want to say . climateaudit.org...
Like I said I am not a scientist but I can watch how they discuss
issues and take away from them what is going on . Words like deception ,collusion ,fraud ,or if you prefer incompetence can be applied to some of the
main actors in this AGW scam . That would also include institutions like the EPA . In the end though it's just my opinion . a reply to: