It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Evolution is a farce: Evidence

page: 55
27
<< 52  53  54    56  57  58 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Dec, 4 2014 @ 09:45 AM
link   
a reply to: BlackManINC

You need to stop calling people apes as a derogatory insult.

Yes, your excuse is "they call themselves apes". Key word, excuse.

The spiteful manner in which you use it is pathetic.

I can just imagine you at your keyboard, angry at us heathens.

The vibe of "these people deserve hell" behind your posts.

The rage I feel you have because some of us are atheists.

Really amusing from my perspective. Your temples throbbing!

Just relax man, it's ok if people disagree. But...

Let's not resort to primal instincts and start flinging poop!

(You know, because we're apes)




posted on Dec, 4 2014 @ 09:48 AM
link   
a reply to: WakeUpBeer

Mind you If I was an Ape and they told me Blackmaninc was related I would go bananas also
.



posted on Dec, 4 2014 @ 09:52 AM
link   

originally posted by: WakeUpBeer
a reply to: BlackManINC

You need to stop calling people apes as a derogatory insult.

Yes, your excuse is "they call themselves apes". Key word, excuse.

The spiteful manner in which you use it is pathetic.

I can just imagine you at your keyboard, angry at us heathens.

The vibe of "these people deserve hell" behind your posts.

The rage I feel you have because some of us are atheists.

Really amusing from my perspective. Your temples throbbing!

Just relax man, it's ok if people disagree. But...

Let's not resort to primal instincts and start flinging poop!

(You know, because we're apes)


Seconded. Not that we're very hairy apes.



posted on Dec, 4 2014 @ 09:54 AM
link   
a reply to: Krazysh0t

Not enough evidence? You haven't provided any evidence at all. By the way, there is a verse about not casting pearls before swine. Look yourself in the mirror and see if you fit that description.



posted on Dec, 4 2014 @ 09:54 AM
link   

edit on 4-12-2014 by BlackManINC because: none ya business



posted on Dec, 4 2014 @ 09:55 AM
link   

originally posted by: BlackManINC
a reply to: Krazysh0t

Not enough evidence? You haven't provided any evidence at all. By the way, there is a verse about not casting pearls before swine. Look yourself in the mirror and see if you fit that description.



I posted a link to the Miller/Urey experiment on the previous page...



posted on Dec, 4 2014 @ 10:01 AM
link   

originally posted by: boymonkey74
a reply to: WakeUpBeer

Mind you If I was an Ape and they told me Blackmaninc was related I would go bananas also
.




i dunno... robin williams once said, "I've actually gone to the zoo and had monkeys shout to me from their cages, "I'm in here when you're walking around like that?"



posted on Dec, 4 2014 @ 10:04 AM
link   
Dunno about anyone else but I love the fact we are related to other Great Apes.
Years ago my 2nd wife bought me a monkey at london zoo and I had a free pass for a year and I would go and feed my likkle guy and then trot other to the Chimp enclosure and spend hours interacting with them.
Look in the eyes of a Chimp and you know all animals have souls.



posted on Dec, 4 2014 @ 10:12 AM
link   
a reply to: WakeUpBeer

Oh no you've got me wrong, I'm not angry at all, I'm a cool headed guy just amusing myself with the level of anti-scientific stupidity seen in this thread.



posted on Dec, 4 2014 @ 10:13 AM
link   
a reply to: BlackManINC

Still waiting on that evidence Mr. Detector of Anti-Science stupidity.



posted on Dec, 4 2014 @ 10:20 AM
link   
a reply to: GetHyped

wtf are you babbling about now?



posted on Dec, 4 2014 @ 10:25 AM
link   
a reply to: kayej1188


analogy
əˈnalədʒi/Submit
noun
a comparison between one thing and another, typically for the purpose of explanation or clarification.
"an analogy between the workings of nature and those of human societies"
a correspondence or partial similarity.
"the syndrome is called deep dysgraphia because of its analogy to deep dyslexia"
a thing which is comparable to something else in significant respects.
"works of art were seen as an analogy for works of nature"


If you consider my analogy "babbling", then the claim of "macro" evolution being false is equally "babbling".
edit on 4-12-2014 by GetHyped because: (no reason given)



posted on Dec, 4 2014 @ 10:26 AM
link   
a reply to: Krazysh0t

I`m still waiting for you to provide the pathway for amino acids, the information that all living organisms are base on to form themselves into proteins that would give you a reasonable cause to believe that molecules to man could happen naturally, don`t waste my time if you can`t.


edit on 4-12-2014 by BlackManINC because: (no reason given)

edit on 4-12-2014 by BlackManINC because: (no reason given)



posted on Dec, 4 2014 @ 10:28 AM
link   
a reply to: BlackManINC

Let me guess... you'll give us an insightful critique into any scientific evidence presented? LOL!!



posted on Dec, 4 2014 @ 10:29 AM
link   
a reply to: BlackManINC

So you still haven't addressed my example which I provided you on the very bottom of page 44. It's really sad that you can't focus on one argument and show me where you think it's flawed, but would rather go back and forth with personal attacks and mud-slinging..the same BS that has been going on for about 50 pages so far



posted on Dec, 4 2014 @ 10:29 AM
link   
a reply to: BlackManINC

Look I said that evidence existed for Abiogenesis, then I EXPLICITLY said that not enough exists to prove it as a valid theory. BUT evidence for it does exist and new evidence is further suggesting that it is valid. Obviously, as a hypothesis, there are still holes in the idea, that's how it works though.

In any case:
Amount of evidence I have provided for this topic: 1
Amount of evidence you have provided for God hypothesis: 0

Ball is in your court.

PS: Because I am such a great guy. Here is another link that explains the two leading Abiogenesis hypotheses and gives further evidence for why scientists think it is true.

Abiogenesis: The Scientific Theory of the Origin of Life Note: layman definition of theory is being used in this article. Again Abiogenesis isn't a theory
edit on 4-12-2014 by Krazysh0t because: (no reason given)



posted on Dec, 4 2014 @ 10:32 AM
link   
a reply to: GetHyped

Actually, gethyped, I was a few pages behind and was actually replying to your comment regarding something about why "babies don't grow beards," or something erroneous like that



posted on Dec, 4 2014 @ 10:38 AM
link   
a reply to: TzarChasm
a reply to: boymonkey74

About the ape-man thing :
Humans share 50% DNA with bananas




posted on Dec, 4 2014 @ 10:39 AM
link   
a reply to: Krazysh0t

In other.words, you have no reasonable cause to believe this occurred naturally

Evidence for abiogenesis to occur: 0

Evidence for God: not important

Case closed
edit on 4-12-2014 by BlackManINC because: (no reason given)



posted on Dec, 4 2014 @ 10:41 AM
link   

originally posted by: BlackManINC
a reply to: Krazysh0t

In other.words, you have no reasonable cause to believe this occurred naturally

Evidence for abiogenesis to occur: 0

Evidence for God: not important

Case closed


it appears to me that you just decided two helpfully provided links on abiogenesis were "not important". you didnt even acknowledge their existence. case not closed...case of the double standards that is.

all you have done and are going to do is continue to point at the elephant and say there is nothing there but a trick of the light. we cant force you to accept or even consider the evidence and you have capitalized on that with every post. this thread has been a monumental waste of time no matter who stepped up to bat against the theory of evolution and there has still been no viable alternative offered.

to quote lord of the rings: "fly you fools!"

also, this:


edit on 4-12-2014 by TzarChasm because: (no reason given)







 
27
<< 52  53  54    56  57  58 >>

log in

join