It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: kayej1188
The link I referred to in my post is here: www.talkorigins.org...
It is very helpful to follow along with this link because it provides pictures, citations, and further information. And the citations it links are from ACTUAL, PEER-REVIEWED, WELL-RESPECTED SCIENTIFIC JOURNALS LIKE SCIENCE. So, born2watch, before you say your typical shpeel about how you refuse to visit links, and refuse to look at "evolution" websites, please keep in mind that the data and information here presented are from neutral, peer-reviewed scientific journals.
originally posted by: kennyb72
a reply to: Barcs
You are treading on very dangerous ground as far as scientific method is concerned. The fact that a theory is as good as the latest available information and when presented the theory is modified. I have to use another cliche and there are two readily available, so for efficiencies sake, "Science is barking up a blind alley". it wouldn't be the first time.
It is also the opinion of some of the brightest minds on the planet, Stephen Hawking, Michio Kaku to name just two of the more high profile scientists. Quantum physics is pretty much screaming out this fact but many main stream scientists don't have the internal fortitude to put their hands up, demoting it to pseudoscience.
There is not much here that I would argue against beyond stating that many current scientific models don't appear to be working out too well. They are all missing a key element(or two),
originally posted by: borntowatch
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
Dubious sites? Those are the sites that are going to tell you exactly what evolution says. Yes they are biased towards evolution, but reading those sites is getting your information right from the horse's mouth. It's a much better source than reading a Creationist site that makes things up. Didn't your English professors in college teach you how to properly vet sources?
All your sites are somewhat suspect to me and in turn I consider them dubious and avoid their silly evidence and myth.
I can play the game as well as any atheist evolutionist can.
No I'd say you are much better at playing the game of ignorance than any "atheist evolutionist".
Those are the sites that are going to tell you exactly what evolutionist believe as opposed to what is observed in nature. Yes they are biased towards evolution, but reading those sites is getting your information right from the horse's mouth, the scientists who make their living selling evolution to the public. It's a much better source for atheists than reading a Creationist site that uses evidence that evolutionists refuse to read or understand.
Now dear krazyshot, you vet source your religion, I will mine
I am not ignorant of your argument, you are clearly ignorant of mine.
originally posted by: Akragon
a reply to: BlackManINC
Well hate to break it to ya bro... You're the same as I am...
Regardless of if evolution or creation is correct... you and I are the same....
IF I am an "ape" then so are you... I feel like I should be sticking my tongue out mocking you like we're in the school yard... but I won't stoop to your level...
I will say though... At the very least the evolution camp has educated people on their side... where as you are stuck with illiterate barbarian sheep herders...
originally posted by: Akragon"Regardless of if evolution or creation is correct... you and I are the same....
originally posted by: AkragonIF I am an "ape" then so are you... I feel like I should be sticking my tongue out mocking you like we're in the school yard... but I won't stoop to your level...
originally posted by: WakeUpBeer
a reply to: BlackManINC
Must you always sound so angry and insulting?
Am I suppose to take it like a racial charge or some prejudice against evolution?
Either way I'm not offended. But petty name calling...
So Christ like ya know? Very constructive.