It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Noinden
a reply to: borntowatch
Chemist as in chemistry degree, as opposed to Chemist as in Pharmacist. I've made pharmaceuticals for the big boys
As to where the elements came from? Not really a Chemists area, but go find an astrophysicist. ALso I am not an atheist so you really are going to have a different tac with me
this post reminds me of an interview with Tom Cruise, that i saw once....
he was going on to the interviewer about how "you don't know the facts and history of psychiatry, i do", when his sole basis for understanding psychiatry, was the lunatic assertions and ramblings, put to paper, of L. Ron Hubbard..
The Bible is the only book on the planet that tells us where these pagan gods come from and who they really are. The Bible "validates" all other gods as fallen angels and devils disguising themselves as forces of nature.
This is nothing more than the old Hindu belief in reincarnation
it occurred because there was a being called Yahweh, also known as Jesus doing the informing
The use of non-biblical language
Christians should be cautious while using language not found in Scripture to define God, however, they should not refrain from doing so. John Frame, in his Doctrine of God (2002), shows that "as it struggled to define the doctrine of the Trinity precisely, the church came to adopt specialized terminology for God's oneness and threeness... in general, these terms have served the church well. But they have also raised additional questions and caused some misunderstandings," (p. 696). Frame openly admits that these terms have not solved the problems or answered every question. However, these terms did help the church solidify what it believed against the ever present heresies.
adopt specialized terminology for God's oneness and threeness... in general, these terms have served the church well
as supernatural in origin verses all other gods where there is no distinction between the creator and its creation,
If these stories had any truth to them at all, then we would see proof of it by the scientific method
and the only source described in this manner is Yahweh.
originally posted by: Astyanax
a reply to: borntowatch
Could you (the OP is free to do this as well) spell out here, as clearly as possible, what evidence — if any — would be required in order for you to accept that evolution by natural selection is the cause of the variation between different species (that is, to accept that all life on Earth, humans included, is descended from a common ancestor)?
I ask because you have stated repeatedly in this thread that the evidence presented thus far has not convinced you. Is there anything that would convince you? What is it?
This idea that we create our own reality is also the same rubbish preached by the metaphysical occult
originally posted by: borntowatch
The foundation needs to be set before the roof.
Thanks Kent Hovind, you are the man.
I bet you would bleat a lot louder if your pharmaceuticals were designed and made in kitchens, by untrained and uncaring people. I would bet a lot that at some point you've taken a pharmaceutical for something.
Elohim is ... a plural. Yes, I know, it's embarrassing...
It actually means 'the lordS'