It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Another_Nut
I have another question.
Why oklahoma?
We have a bombing of the federal building, a suicide bomber at the OU campus, flight training for hijackers, beheading and now Z.M. wants to testify there.
What's going on? For some reason Oklahoma seems to play a part in this play
But I can figure out why!
originally posted by: AgentShillington
originally posted by: eisegesis
Thanks for your input. Worst approach to a subject I have ever seen. This does not dismiss the already convicted hijackers, it just adds another layer of meat to the lasagna. Do you believe the official story? And if you do, can you admit there are things we still don't know?
Let me guess, Hitler won the lotto and never asked for a dime in funding. People with $$$ can afford to change the course of history.
Never hear such a moronic response in my life, if you really had friends killed in the 9/11 attacks, then why would you not want the people held responsible for their crimes? Why forget about it as if nothing happened? No the terrorists do not win if we continue to talk about it and investigate it, the only way the terrorists win is if we do not investigate it and they go on to commit more crimes against humanity. It is as big a crime to brush it aside.
I don't -care- about the official story.
I don't -care- about 9/11.
Inside job. Outside job. Holograms. No one died. Everyone died. No attackers. Osama. Obama. Bush. Oil. Gold. Jews. Steel. Missiles.
It's a joke.
A few thousand people died, including a few people that I actually knew first hand. The only way the terrorists win is if we keep rehashing this criminal act and allow our public policy to continue to be motivated by its ghost.
originally posted by: AgentShillington
Are we still talking about 9/11?
Are we still caring what a guy convicted of 9/11 is saying?
Looks like the terrorists won.
originally posted by: Thecakeisalie
This is more than plausible IMO.
...
The question is why, and hopefully this man is 'coerced' to spill the beans because what he divulges could implicate many people.
originally posted by: WCmutant
a reply to: eisegesis
He can't be believed... ENTIRELY.
He's doing what he's suppose to do - blame Saudi Arabia so that people stop considering the US government as one of the perpetrators of 9/11.
Taking him seriously does this:
1. Shifts blame away from US gov't
2. Gives us a new enemy (Saudi) with massive amounts of oil and gold to plunder
The real issue is that our government won't actually do anything, they are too intimately tied to the Saudis. But if it gains traction it will be beat like a dead horse in the media so people are brainwashed into thinking it was Saudi and only Saudi behind it. The derp is strong.
originally posted by: Thecakeisalie
This is more than plausible IMO.
...
The question is why, and hopefully this man is 'coerced' to spill the beans because what he divulges could implicate many people.
The why is plainly obvious - shift blame. He won't divulge the real masterminds, only the ones that aren't standing on US soil.
The terrorists did win, and they are still running our country.
Inmates are kept in cells measuring 7ft by 12ft for 23 hours a day. The bed, desk and stool are immovable and cast from poured concrete. The cells also feature shower cubicals and a toilet.
A black and white television provides classes, religious services and fifty channels of broadcasting. Each cell has a slit window with a view onto an inner courtyard and a patch of sky. Each inmate gets a copy of USA Today, with certain articles cut out.
Inmates can play games of bingo alone in their cells. The winners get chocolate bars, or the right to have their picture taken and sent to their family.
He is seeking to be relocated, complaining his cell is freezing, and infested by rodents. He asked to be moved away from a prison unit he described as a “Saudi stronghold.”
You would still read the four pages he has put together if you could, wouldn't you?
Considering Prince Turki was director general of intelligence during the Clinton administration, I don't see why it couldn't have been a possibility.
French authorities began monitoring Zacarias Moussaoui in 1996 after they discovered him hanging around with Islamic extremists. In 1999 French authorities placed him on terrorist watch.
All the pieces were in place and he was hanging around with the right crowd. I'm assuming all that was needed was the funding and knowledge to fly a plane. He had still yet to attend flight school while Clinton was President. So he missed the boat.