It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

UN Denies Using Kenyan Vaccination Program for Population Control

page: 1
11

log in

join
share:

posted on Nov, 16 2014 @ 09:40 PM
link   
Vaccination conspiracy deluxe.

Big accusations.

Big denials

Hmmm.


Responding to allegations that a United Nations-sponsored vaccination program in Kenya is a stealth population-control measure, the United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF) and the World Health Organization (WHO) have denied that the vaccines are intended to do anything but prevent neonatal tetanus, which the WHO says “kill[s] hundreds of newborns every year” in that African nation.

As The New American recently reported, two Roman Catholic organizations in Kenya have alleged that the tetanus vaccine being administered to women of childbearing age under the joint UNICEF-WHO program also contains Human Chorionic Gonadotropin (hCG), a hormone produced by human embryos to prepare them to be implanted in their mothers’ wombs and thereafter to signal their mothers’ bodies to sustain them until birth.



“WHO and UNICEF confirm that the vaccines are safe and are procured from a pre-qualified manufacturer,” the statement added. “This safety is assured through a three-pronged global testing system and the vaccine has reached more than 130 million women with at least two doses in 52 countries” — a frightening statistic if the allegations turn out to be true.



UN Denies Using Kenyan Vaccination Program for Population Control






edit on Nov-16-2014 by xuenchen because:





posted on Nov, 16 2014 @ 09:47 PM
link   
Well ......... what else are they going to say.

It is not like they could tell the truth.

It is up to us, individually and as a group to ferret out the truth.

The UN is not a group of nations united.

Most countries have no say at all.

The general assembly has no real power

Power rests with the West, the US and its Bitches.

P



posted on Nov, 16 2014 @ 10:42 PM
link   
I have said it before, if the us would intentionally infect people with syphilis as some kind of study why is it so far fetched that it could be going on now? If it comes out that it is true, all we will hear is the standard apology BS and how it won't happen again.



posted on Nov, 16 2014 @ 11:01 PM
link   
Isn't this vaccine programme sponsored too by the Bill and Melinda Gates foundation?

That info isn't mentioned above but I think I read it in another couple of articles last week. I'll have a look later today.



posted on Nov, 16 2014 @ 11:03 PM
link   
I saw this a few days ago a meant to post it but procrastinated. Here is the larger story. Op appreciate you posting this but you should have dug a little deeper.

global research

Our concern and the subject of this discussion is the WHO/UNICEF sponsored tetanus immunization campaign launched last year in October ostensibly to eradicate neonatal tetanus. It is targeted at girls and women between the ages of 14 – 49 (child bearing age) and in 60 specific districts spread all around the country. The tetanus vaccine being used in this campaign has been imported into the country specifically for this purpose and bears a different batch number from the regular TT. So far, 3 doses have been given – the first in October 2013, the second in March 2014 and the third in October 2014. It is highly possible that there are two more doses to go.



Giving five doses of tetanus vaccination every 6 months is not usual or the recommended regime for tetanus vaccination. The only time tetanus vaccine has been given in five doses is when it is used as a carrier in fertility regulating vaccines laced with the pregnancy hormone – Human Chorionic Gonadotropin (HCG) developed by WHO in 1992.



When tetanus is laced with HCG and administered in five doses every 6 months, the woman develops antibodies against both the tetanus and the HCG in 2 – 3 years after the last injection. Once a mother develops antibodies against HCG, she rejects any pregnancy as soon as it starts growing in her womb thus causing repeated abortions and subsequent sterility.

WHO conducted massive vaccinations campaigns using the tetanus vaccine laced with HCG in Mexico in 1993 and Nicaragua and Philippines in 1994 ostensibly to eradicate neonatal tetanus. The campaign targeted women aged 14 – 49 years and each received a total of 5 injections.


Has anyone in the US ever gotten a tetanus every 6 months for 5 doses? Once every ten years is the norm. And what god made WHO the one who determines who should have children or not?

And then there is this The Guardian from 2001



Scientists have created the ultimate GM crop: contraceptive corn. Waiving fields of maize may one day save the world from overpopulation.

The pregnancy prevention plants are the handiwork of the San Diego biotechnology company Epicyte, where researchers have discovered a rare class of human antibodies that attack sperm.

By isolating the genes that regulate the manufacture of these antibodies, and by putting them in corn plants, the company has created tiny horticultural factories that make contraceptives.

'We have a hothouse filled with corn plants that make anti-sperm antibodies,' said Epicyte president Mitch Hein.


They are so proud of themselves. Wonder how many fields this has accidentally gotten into in the last 13 years.



posted on Nov, 16 2014 @ 11:09 PM
link   
Not that this couldn't be some type of population control, but if it is it isn't working very well. There are plenty of easier/cheaper ways to control the population if they really wanted to.

In all honesty, a bit of population control in those countries wouldn't be a bad thing. There are so many children that are born into circumstances in Africa that no living thing on this earth should have to deal with.

Call me cruel, but I think it is cruel to allow people to have children just so they can suffer and die.



posted on Nov, 16 2014 @ 11:16 PM
link   
a reply to: liveandlearn

They are so proud of themselves. Wonder how many fields this has accidentally gotten into in the last 13 years.
None probably. No market for it.
From 2004:

The demise of Epicyte is the latest casualty for the region's fledgling agricultural biotechnology industry, which just five years ago appeared to hold considerable commercial promise.

www.utsandiego.com...


edit on 11/16/2014 by Phage because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 16 2014 @ 11:38 PM
link   
a reply to: Phage

Whoops. Says "page lost"



posted on Nov, 17 2014 @ 12:32 AM
link   
Here's the claim to damage in the OP's article:


The inclusion of hCG in the tetanus vaccine “causes women’s bodies to develop an immune response to attack the hormone, which is essential to pregnancy,” explained TNA’s Alex Newman. “So, when a woman who has received the UN shots gets pregnant, her body fights the crucial hCG — resulting in the death of the unborn child in the womb. Eventually, the supposed inoculations … result in permanent sterility after multiple doses.” [...] The WHO and UNICEF issued a joint statement Thursday to counter what they claim is “misinformation” surrounding the vaccination program. “These grave allegations,” they stated, “are not backed up by evidence.” They dismissed the Catholic groups’ test results, saying that the testing “needs to be done in a suitable laboratory, and from a sample of the actual medicine/vaccine obtained from an unopened pack and not a blood sample.” - See more at: www.thedailysheeple.com...


Bill Gates is probably behind this vaccine. And we all know where he stands on population control. I'm off to do some more research on this.

S&F, putting hCG in a vaccine? Vaccines inoculate against things, in this case pregnancy? HCG shots are given as infertility treatment to women so this is very confusing. Why would they be giving shots that increase fertility?
edit on 17-11-2014 by StoutBroux because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 17 2014 @ 12:37 AM
link   

originally posted by: transola
Not that this couldn't be some type of population control, but if it is it isn't working very well. There are plenty of easier/cheaper ways to control the population if they really wanted to.

In all honesty, a bit of population control in those countries wouldn't be a bad thing. There are so many children that are born into circumstances in Africa that no living thing on this earth should have to deal with.

Call me cruel, but I think it is cruel to allow people to have children just so they can suffer and die.


Education would go a long way in teaching these people to make responsible choices, also free birth control. Maybe the US Government and Health insurance companies should get involved with the eating habits of obese disease ridden Americans because of their irresponsibility. Oh wait, they are doing just that.



posted on Nov, 17 2014 @ 07:44 PM
link   
a reply to: xuenchen

Africa became the testing grounds for many a studies beginning with the Rockefeller group in the early 1900's. Rockefeller was a staunch supporter of Spangler and her eugenics policy.



posted on Nov, 17 2014 @ 09:23 PM
link   
The UN doesn't answer to the US. It answers to the Global Elites.



new topics

top topics



 
11

log in

join