It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
BAE Systems claims South Korea’s military purchasing agency is shaking the company down for $43 million following a canceled deal to upgrade the nation’s fleet of Lockheed Martin F-16 fighters and has filed suit in US district court to avoid payment.
South Korea on 5 November terminated a Foreign Military Sales contract with BAE to upgrade its F-16 fighters, a deal potentially worth $1.7 billion. The company saw the FMS deal as a huge win in the competition with Lockheed to upgrade the thousands of F-16s currently in service worldwide.
BAE Systems’s contract would have seen 134 aircraft receive new avionics and an active electronic scanned array (AESA) radar produced by Raytheon. The company alleges that South Korea killed the deal because BAE failed to secure a sufficiently low price through the US foreign military sales process. BAE is not seeking reinstatement of the contract.
originally posted by: Zaphod58
BAE Systems has announced they are filing a suit in US District Court, claiming that the South Korean military purchasing agency is demanding $43M after canceling an upgrade for their F-16s. South Korea signed the deal with BAE, worth a potential $1.7B, through the Foreign Military Sales office to upgrade 143 F-16s with new radars and avionics.
The FMS office told the Korean government that the cost could increase as much as $800M in August, $473M to the FMS office, the rest to BAE Systems. BAE claims that when the Koreans couldn't bring that cost down, they instructed the FMS office to cancel the deal. When the contract was signed, BAE provided a Guarantee of $43.25M, if it failed to complete certain actions during the Bid phase. According to BAE that phase is long completed, but DAPA is still insisting on payment of that Guarantee.
BAE Systems claims South Korea’s military purchasing agency is shaking the company down for $43 million following a canceled deal to upgrade the nation’s fleet of Lockheed Martin F-16 fighters and has filed suit in US district court to avoid payment.
South Korea on 5 November terminated a Foreign Military Sales contract with BAE to upgrade its F-16 fighters, a deal potentially worth $1.7 billion. The company saw the FMS deal as a huge win in the competition with Lockheed to upgrade the thousands of F-16s currently in service worldwide.
BAE Systems’s contract would have seen 134 aircraft receive new avionics and an active electronic scanned array (AESA) radar produced by Raytheon. The company alleges that South Korea killed the deal because BAE failed to secure a sufficiently low price through the US foreign military sales process. BAE is not seeking reinstatement of the contract.
www.flightglobal.com...
originally posted by: alldaylong
I am sure The British Government will compensate BAE for loss of earnings. One of their "Pals in The City Of London "
originally posted by: Aloysius the Gaul
originally posted by: alldaylong
I am sure The British Government will compensate BAE for loss of earnings. One of their "Pals in The City Of London "
The major shareholders in BAe Systems plc (the arms-length parent company of BAe Systems Inc that operates in the USA) are:
Invesco - HQ's in alabama
Capital Group Companies - HQ's in LA
Blackrock Inc - NYC
Franklin Investments - also NYC
AXA - the French insurance firm
- each of these firms have about 5% or more (Franklin has 4.92%)
2 British firms - Barclays and Silchester have about 4 and 3% respectively.
Looks mostly like a US firm to me.
a reply to: alldaylong
That's just The U.S. arm of the Business.
originally posted by: Aloysius the Gaul
a reply to: alldaylong
That's just The U.S. arm of the Business.
No - read it again - that is the shareholding of BAe Corporation - the parent company.
originally posted by: Aloysius the Gaul
a reply to: alldaylong
Nonetheless all the biggest shareholders are US-based companies...
The US Govt insists that BAe Inc (the American arm) cannot be run from London - it is an independent body or else it cannot supply the US military.
And it is the US body that is taking this action, not the parent body.
Over to you for your continued conspiracy nonsense.....
originally posted by: alldaylong
The British Government holds the " Golden Share " in the company which out votes every other shareholder combined.
That's just The U.S. arm of the Business.
BAE is an abbreviation for BRITISH AEROSPACE ELECTRONIC Systems.
originally posted by: Aloysius the Gaul
a reply to: alldaylong
Nonetheless all the biggest shareholders are US-based companies...
The US Govt insists that BAe Inc (the American arm) cannot be run from London - it is an independent body or else it cannot supply the US military.
And it is the US body that is taking this action, not the parent body.
Over to you for your continued conspiracy nonsense.....