It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: WeRpeons
a reply to: pianopraze
I wouldn't want to be anywhere near Furguson when the verdict comes down. Reporters are probably taking a risk being in the middle of a hornets nest.
originally posted by: seeker1963
a reply to: pianopraze
Watching Ben now, are all of those businesses boarded up because they are close or just prepared?
originally posted by: Nyiah
Remember folks -- you cannot help those whom do not help themselves. If the town self destructs, whatever the verdict is, then it's on them, no on else. They got their wits about them during the initial riots/protests (after what, 11 days? 12?) BUT they still need to be just as proactive against trouble now as they (finally) were back then. Otherwise, the speaking out, the attention, the spotlight on the police there -- it's all for naught.
originally posted by: seeker1963
a reply to: pianopraze
Did you hear that??????
Ben just said, that there are MORE warrants than population for the city of Ferguson!
WOW!
Welcome to the poster child of the Police State of America!
Maybe we should change the USA to the PSA?
Debtors prisons were outlawed in the United States nearly 200 years ago. And more than 30 years ago, the U.S. Supreme Court made it clear: Judges cannot send people to jail just because they are too poor to pay their court fines.
originally posted by: onequestion
a reply to: seeker1963
I was just reading this thread and your comment blew me away. I'm going to look for links in the meantime do you have any?
Also there are a lot of people in jail ONLY for their debts.
This has already been ruled unconstitutional by the Supreme Court: