It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
That's what Rome continued to do after legalizing it. Ever heard of the pagan persecutions? Rome FORCED Christianity on its people by death threats and genocide. Did god work through the Roman authorities to persecute and torture/kill pagans? Romans 13 says so.
We didn't evolve to be religious, we are programmed to be religious by the people who came before us. If we evolved into religion then everyone would be religious, but we're not.
An explosion of recent research suggests that religious beliefs and behaviors are universal, arise from deep-seated cognitive mechanisms, and were favored by natural selection over human evolutionary history.
However, if a propensity towards religious beliefs is a fundamental characteristic of human brains (as both by-product theorists and adaptationists agree), and/or an important ingredient of Darwinian fitness (as adaptationists argue), then how do we explain the existence and prevalence of atheists even among ancient and traditional societies?
The null hypothesis is that, like other psychological traits, due to natural variation among individuals in genetics, physiology, and cognition, there will always be a range of strengths of religious beliefs. Atheists may therefore simply represent one end of a natural distribution of belief. However, an evolutionary approach to religion raises some more interesting adaptive hypotheses for atheism, which I explore here. Key among them are:
- frequency dependence may mean that atheism as a ‘‘strategy’’ is selected for (along with selection for the ‘strategy’ of belief), as long as atheists do not become too numerous;
- ecological variation may mean that atheism outperforms belief in certain settings or at certain times, maintaining a mix in the overall population;
- the presence of atheists may reinforce or temper religious beliefs and behaviors in the face of skepticism, boosting religious commitment, credibility, or practicality in the group as a whole;
- the presence of atheists may catalyze the functional advantages of religion, analogous to the way that loners or non-participants can enhance the evolution of cooperation. Just as evolutionary theorists ask what religious beliefs are ‘for’ in terms of functional benefits for Darwinian fitness, an evolutionary approach suggests we should also at least consider what atheists might be for.
originally posted by: BELIEVERpriest
a reply to: 3NL1GHT3N3D1
Im sorry, but you dont understand, because you choose not to. You'll believe theosophical crap that some new ager cooked up it their basement, but you wont let the bible speak for itself. Rather than pointing the finger, try asking God the real questions?
This op has nothing to offer. No textual support, no dates, and you seem to be content with that.
originally posted by: DJMSN
a reply to: Jenisiz
They are all beautiful stories meant to provide comfort and fulfill a human need...not a Buddhist need or a christian need...or a Muslim need but a human need...something that provides answers where there are none...something that we can look forward too be it virgins in heaven....the pearly gates...another life right here....ect.