It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: WilsonWilson
a reply to: intrepid
I thought the poster was making a point that straight going to the world cup should show solidarity with gays. Not the natives of Qatar.
We should not be supporting any country which restricts the rights of any group.
originally posted by: boymonkey74
It isn't the only reason the world cup should have never been given to them also.
The stadiums are built upon slave labor more or less.
www.hrw.org...
en.wikipedia.org...
www.amnesty.org...
Flogging and stoning legal.
Disgusting.
The Reich Press Chamber under Joseph Goebbels's Ministry of Propaganda exerted strict censorship over the German press, radio, film, and publishing. The Chamber issued numerous directives regarding coverage of the Olympic Games, limiting the scope and content of reporting by German journalists.
“German newspapers will print -- at their own risk -- reports from the Olympics released prior to the official press report.”
July 22, 1936
“Press coverage should not mention that there are two non-Aryans among the women: Helene Mayer (fencing) and Gretel Bergmann (high jump and all-around track and field competition).”
July 16, 1936
'The racial point of view should not be used in any way in reporting sports results; above all Negroes should not be insensitively reported. . . . Negroes are American citizens and must be treated with respect as Americans.“
August 3, 1936
“No comments should be made regarding Helene Mayer's non-Aryan ancestry or her expectations for a gold medal at the Olympics.”
February 19, 1936
originally posted by: WilsonWilson
a reply to: Krazysh0t
I don't homosexuality is illegal in Russia is it?
originally posted by: VirusGuard
a reply to: boymonkey74
We should not be supporting any country which restricts the rights of any group.
Does that include Nazi's, Far right, Middle right, Paedophiles, radical Islam or people that don't like gays or is it just groups of people you happen to agree with.
The rights of blacks are restricted in many places but they cannot help it but if Gays didn't dress up to make a political statement and to drule over each other in public and close the bedroom door then they would be perfectly OK.
People in India don't like it if I eat beef but I don't go screaming about it and telling them what is right and what's not or friends not to visit India because I respect there culture so what makes it different when it comes to Gays, just how many more rights do you want.
originally posted by: intrepid
a reply to: tavi45
Again your point is lost on me. I guess my "emotion" chip isn't working that well today. Those Olympics were in '36. Before the Nazi's went totally whacko. Not the comparison you meant to make I'm sure.
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
a reply to: crazyewok
True, but I have every right to disapprove. It's not like I'm saying we need to go in guns blazing and force them to change their ways. Change through shame has a LOT less casualties than change through war.
originally posted by: WilsonWilson
I think people using the word respect with regards to discrimination is wrong, you can say people should abide by the laws but you can't expect people to respect such blatent discrimination.