It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.


Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.


Help ATS via PayPal:
learn more

It was Loretta Lynch, No it was Loretta Lynch

page: 1

log in


posted on Nov, 10 2014 @ 11:41 PM
Deluxe story by Breitbart the other day about Loretta Lynch being the lawyer that helped defend the Clintons during the Whitewater investigations.

Loretta Lynch is Obama's nominee for Attorney General to replace Eric Holder.

Seems there's at least two lawyers named Loretta Lynch !!!!

And guess who didn't (probably didn't) defend Clinton.

But I bet many original readers of the original story don't know that yet

I generally don't like harping on other outlets' errors or the always mortifying process of issuing a correction. It's a mix of 'there but for the grace of God' and, in this case, look at the source. But I think here we may have perhaps the best 'correction' in the long storied history of 'corrections', especially ones stemming from errors no remotely careful journalist ever would have made in the first place.

As noted a bit earlier, on Saturday Breitbart published an exclusive pointing out that President Obama's Attorney General nominee Loretta Lynch was part of the team that defended President Clinton during the Whitewater investigation - not a bad little scooplet. Only it wasn't the same Loretta Lynch, which kind of takes the punch out of the story.

Breitbart Issues Best Correction Since Forever

It Was an Honest Mistake !!!


log in