It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

The Real Problem With Americans and Their Disrespect for Obama According to a Canadian

page: 12
24
<< 9  10  11    13  14  15 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Nov, 11 2014 @ 05:10 PM
link   
So, since Obama is such a criminal, the first order of business when Congress gets back in session will be to impeach him, right?

I mean, if he -is- a criminal, I support impeachment. So, either this is rhetoric, and Obama isn't actually a criminal, or Obama is a criminal and Congress isn't going to have the stones to impeach.

Hmm.. it makes you wonder.




posted on Nov, 11 2014 @ 05:12 PM
link   
a reply to: AgentShillington

The remaining Democrats would stonewall the effort.




posted on Nov, 11 2014 @ 05:16 PM
link   
a reply to: AgentShillington

Why? Because the GOP has 2 years to prove that they are more than just an obstructionist party. Loads of time politically speaking. An impeachment trial would be counterproductive. Propose decent policy. Let Obama sign it or not. THAT'S what the GOP needs to do.



posted on Nov, 11 2014 @ 05:17 PM
link   

originally posted by: xuenchen
a reply to: AgentShillington

The remaining Democrats would stonewall the effort.






originally posted by: intrepid
a reply to: AgentShillington

Why? Because the GOP has 2 years to prove that they are more than just an obstructionist party. Loads of time politically speaking. An impeachment trial would be counterproductive. Propose decent policy. Let Obama sign it or not. THAT'S what the GOP needs to do.



I think that is a cop out. If I believed there was a criminal in the White House, and I elected representatives to get him out, I would demand that they fight every second of the day to get him out of office.
edit on 11-11-2014 by AgentShillington because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 11 2014 @ 05:22 PM
link   

originally posted by: AgentShillington
I think that is a cop out. If I believed there was a criminal in the White House, and I elected representatives to get him out, I would demand that they fight every second of the day to get him out of office.


Well, there's another idiom. "One gets what one deserves."



posted on Nov, 11 2014 @ 05:31 PM
link   
a reply to: amazing

I think clinton would blow them away

They would be talk garbage and throwing mud
Slick willie would use an emotional touch and reach out to the americans

Remember as katt williams said
The invitation reads bill clinton plus one
I really dont think america would care who he brought as a date to the party



posted on Nov, 11 2014 @ 05:33 PM
link   

originally posted by: ripcontrol
a reply to: amazing

I think clinton would blow them away

They would be talk garbage and throwing mud
Slick willie would use an emotional touch and reach out to the americans

Remember as katt williams said
The invitation reads bill clinton plus one
I really dont think america would care who he brought as a date to the party


So that leads to the next logical question, Does Bill's Clinton + 1 equate to Hillary. Is she a shoe in then?



posted on Nov, 11 2014 @ 05:33 PM
link   
a reply to: AgentShillington

What exactly would you impeach him on?



posted on Nov, 11 2014 @ 06:02 PM
link   

originally posted by: ripcontrol
Please provide proof ALL birthers are Racist
ALL of them


As I never said all birthers were racist.... why should I provide proof for something I never claimed?


as for the sealed records




Did you even read the title? "Government Transparency".... Obama's personal records have nothing to do with Government Transparency...



Again, did you read the title? "and the rule of law " - the law states personal records are private!


Time travellers?


What are you babbling about now? What do time travellers have to do with anything?


So if they filed a FOIA over it
rule of law


Yes, and the law says personal records are private - so not having to show them is following the rule of law!

Why should Obama be the only President that has to make public his private records?
edit on 11-11-2014 by hellobruce because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 11 2014 @ 06:05 PM
link   

originally posted by: tavi45
a reply to: AgentShillington

What exactly would you impeach him on?


???? What do you mean, "What exactly would you impeach him on?"

Just look at him, isn't that enough reason? What other reason do those who want him impeached need?



posted on Nov, 11 2014 @ 06:06 PM
link   
a reply to: amazing

no

the invitation is bill clinton

If he brings monica I am ok with it


If you mean for first lady
then yes

Hillary Clinton
Her presidency would be very similar to bills
there would be a lot of bi-partisan efforts

The climate is different
to many worthless people got positions due to influence and not skill
she would have to remove the lot of them


But she has an uphill fight
Again I reference Katt Williams
sub conciously the issue of the affair is their
some people will wonder if she cant take care of bill then their might be other issues



PS
Did anything ever come of that ruling that congress was in session so the O-man's appointments were illegal
and the decisions they made were as well



posted on Nov, 11 2014 @ 06:09 PM
link   

originally posted by: hellobruce

originally posted by: tavi45
a reply to: AgentShillington

What exactly would you impeach him on?


???? What do you mean, "What exactly would you impeach him on?"

Just look at him, isn't that enough reason? What other reason do those who want him impeached need?


Ooooooooookay. Have you seen the Founding Fathers? I'm pretty sure they didn't set the Constitution up on how someone "looked."
Well, maybe the 49th Amendment.



posted on Nov, 11 2014 @ 06:12 PM
link   
a reply to: phinubian

Despair and hopelessness is not at all what the American people are feeling at this point in time, in my opinion. There is finally an awakening happening, especially in young voters in this country. The importance of doing your homework and actually understanding the issues our three branches of government face day in day out and how they react to those issues, to me, is when Americans can grasp a better sense of where our country is heading. The reason for blaming the President, as you mentioned, is due to the fact he holds the highest level of authority, the commander in chief of this country. But, I can say, Obama made it very clear where and how he would lead this country if he was elected, in 2008. Unfortunately, the people who voted for him did not care, or did not do their homework, or were too lazy to put forth the effort to learn the background of this senator from illinois. All they saw, in my opinion, was a charming, family-oriented, father, husband, african-american, good public speaker who they thought was a better alternative to the GOP candidate at the time. They saw him on ESPN doing bracketology and being "in" with the Hollywood crowd, which placed obama as a pop culture icon so to say. It is sad to think that his supporters knew more and/or cared more about the popularity of obama than his actually policies and beliefs.

Take a close, close look at all of Obama's governmental appointees. Theres a few websites who list them all and discuss, in great detail, each one's history, political stances, etc. In doing so, one is able to draw parallels between each of the appointees. These appointees reflect the direction Obama is attempting to lead this country. Yet, the media does not discuss this in any kind of significant detail, which is why it is difficult for most americans to realize what they hell is going on. Transparency my @ss!!!!



posted on Nov, 11 2014 @ 06:15 PM
link   

originally posted by: tavi45
a reply to: AgentShillington

What exactly would you impeach him on?


I don't personally believe he is a criminal. However, there are people at all levels saying that he is. If I believed he were a criminal, I would be doing -everything- in my power to get him out of office.

Ya know?

Anything else is empty platitude.



posted on Nov, 11 2014 @ 06:18 PM
link   
a reply to: hellobruce

Um whats the definition of transparency

is it not like um wher you um dont hide details of um various things



as for the time travellers
he has to have a lgetimate reason NOT to be open about it

You do NOT get to claim transparency and then say well it doent apply to me
Politicians have no right to privacy nor do you (again Governments opinion not mine)

On that last point I am with you
All of them and the candidates running for it

We should know if the men running the country got a c in science or an A plus
Did he pass constitutional law with an A
What papers did he write on

back to your first complaint
So if it is a personal matter it is not need to have transparency

example
Anthony Weiner was having a private conversation with those women
it is his personal business

Or, well nixon was on his private phone line

Or, bill clinton was having a private moment with that young intern

all personal matter
It was ted kennedy's personal car


Logic fail major

The truth is transparency was promised and not delivered
in fact it was purposely sold as a bill of goods

It was a lie
either you share all records and keep your word
or you claim national security or it was a personal matter between me and monica

you dont get it both ways

It is why I think we should take the trade for the canadians sight unseen..
fresh new liars and parasites would do the country good

carry on



posted on Nov, 11 2014 @ 06:21 PM
link   
a reply to: hellobruce

Let me help you out....

Placing cause based on the color, religious beliefs, gender, sexual preference, etc of a person, makes the person who brings it up appear shallow, weak, uneducated, and racist. If you cannot think of a reason why Obama could be on trial for impeachment, for the sake of the argument at hand, do not just throw in the fact that he is black. Ultimately, it makes you appear extremely uneducated about any political issues at hand. It should be condemned by the american people, but for some unknown reason, playing the race card is readily done by many people and accepted by many. ALL FOR ONE , AND ONE FOR ALL. Your welcome.



posted on Nov, 11 2014 @ 06:25 PM
link   
I believe, and I may be wrong, that hellobruce may have been alluding ironically to the idea that the only reason many folks want to impeach President Obama is his race.

I don't think hellobruce was offering that as an actual explanation ... is that right bruce?



posted on Nov, 11 2014 @ 06:27 PM
link   
a reply to: jpierc01

There IS transparency, though. You were able easily find this information, read it, digest it, and form your own opinion. The information was not hidden in any way. You were able to post ABOUT this information, and there aren't police knocking down your door. This website is still operating, and nothing has been taken down.

So yes, all of this information IS transparently available to any American or foreigner with the inclination to find it.

What you seem to be complaining about is that the Mass Media isn't somehow spoonfeeding it to us.
edit on 11-11-2014 by ScientificRailgun because: Engrish is hurd. : extra DIV



posted on Nov, 11 2014 @ 06:56 PM
link   

originally posted by: Gryphon66
I believe, and I may be wrong, that hellobruce may have been alluding ironically to the idea that the only reason many folks want to impeach President Obama is his race.

I don't think hellobruce was offering that as an actual explanation ... is that right bruce?



Correct. Some people want him impeached, but they do not have any exact reason as to why he should be impeached, just that he should be.
edit on 11-11-2014 by hellobruce because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 11 2014 @ 08:57 PM
link   
a reply to: hellobruce

Obama has not taken care that the laws be faithfully executed in that:
1) February 2012: President Barack Obama declared that the Defense of Marriage Act was unconstitutional and ordered the Department of Justice to stop defending the law in court. (He does not have the authority to make that declaration)
2) June, 2012: In the wake of the Supreme Court’s decision to strike down three parts of Arizona’s immigration law, the Obama administration announced they would be severely limiting federal assistance to the state. (the president cannot punish states for self-governance)
3) July, 2012: President Obama announced changes to Department of Homeland Security policy that would allow certain undocumented immigrants who were brought to the United States as children the opportunity to apply for a two-year stay that would shield them from deportation. (circumnavigating immigration law)

President Nixon was impeached for failing to execute extant laws, obama has not been. WHY? Because people cant admit their social experiment is a failure.



new topics

top topics



 
24
<< 9  10  11    13  14  15 >>

log in

join