It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: bigfatfurrytexan
a reply to: RedParrotHead
My opinion: since race comes down purely to skin color, why not just use descriptive terms if we need to.
"White male in a red hoodie"
"Black female in a blue Chevy Sedan"
"Pink hermaphrodite riding a unicorn pig"
originally posted by: MX61000
I'm not being racist this is the truth. The Caucasian people are only to be referred to as a race because when they where scientifically made around 6000 years ago, the maker only gave them 6000 years to rule, so they were moving in haste and they were successful as We see today. But there was a self destruction mechanism built in them.
originally posted by: Tusks
Races of a species are simply groups which can be identified by observable physical characteristics.
To deny that races exist is ridiculous.
Every child can tell the difference between Scandanavian Whites and Australian Aborigines, or between Tutsis and Japanese, or between Apaches and African pygmies.
What utter garbage and multi-cultural agenda-cism--- to deny what is obvious to anyone's eyes.
And their cultural differences are frequently even greater than their physical differences.
originally posted by: Noinden
Ok lets turn this around. What purpose does racial classification really serve?