Another Mars anomoly

Not a great deal to see but sure some here will find this worth watching. Add it to the pile...

(Not sure if the video is even mars?)

www.disclose.tv...

a reply to: and14263



It is odd looking but as you said, how do we know this photo wasn't taken on Earth? Why couldn't they just link the original NASA image to the article?

a reply to: Jennyfrenzy

Yeah that's what I thought. Video is on Youtube too, will try and embed.

a reply to: and14263

Looks like a poorly photoshopped picture to me.

originally posted by: gortex
a reply to: and14263

Looks like a poorly photoshopped picture to me.

Perhaps you are correct.

My first thought: Spiders of Mars.

Who knows if we will ever find out?

originally posted by: gortex
a reply to: and14263

Looks like a poorly photoshopped picture to me.

Agreed ... why is the picture in perfect focus, except for the anomaly ...

They lost me when they said, "--is clearly not a rock."

Why would NASA release a blurry rock pic anyway? If there is content in a pic they don't want us to see they just withhold the pic, not "censor" it.

It's not clear what this object is, of course. The narrator seems to assume that glitches and the like do not occur when images are sent tens of millions of miles from Mars to Earth. They do, naturally.
If NASA wanted to conceal something in this image, wouldn't it have been simpler and more effective to simply withhold the image altogether ? Is it reasonable that they would, instead, apply blurring to a technological object in the picture, and in such an inept way that it still looks odd and eye-catching ?

Personally, I suspect that if NASA found an extraterrestrial building or machine on Mars, they'd allow it to be known. Their funding would shoot through the roof, as they were charged with the responsibility of investigating the object further, and looking for additional artifacts on Mars.

Source image Gigapan
But I can't locate the original source image from Nasa.
Apparently, all the images were taken with Mastcam from sols 67-75.
Over to you guys..

originally posted by: Jennyfrenzy
a reply to: and14263

It is odd looking but as you said, how do we know this photo wasn't taken on Earth? Why couldn't they just link the original NASA image to the article?

.........




Now they are just getting lazy.

a reply to: NightFlight
Perhaps ask David Bowie, who saing about "the spiders from Mars." Just a thought.

Gosh.
I wonder why an image ID is not provided.

I guess the youtube poster is trying to imply that NASA smudged that part of the picture to hide something thay don`t want us to see.
if there was something there that they didn`t want us to see they would just not release the picture or at the very least they would do a much better job of removing the item from the picture.
I think the person who made the youtube is the one who purposely did a bad job of smudging a rock.

Not sure what gigapan is but this is the link to the source.

Source

a reply to: boredsilly

Gigapan is a company which assembles original images into large mosaics. That really doesn't help since the claim is that NASA has obfuscated something.

It's blurry because it's moving. I'm going with 'Martian Robo-crab'.

a reply to: Phage

It's pretty clear from the gigapan view though the smudged image is superimposed over the originals, there is a section that is brighter in the top right that includes the right of the smudged 'object'. That right piece should be brighter if part of the original, but it isn't.

Here we go. Here's one of the originals which was used for the mosaic. It's part of the rover. Close and out of focus.
mars.jpl.nasa.gov...

mars.jpl.nasa.gov...

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: boredsilly

Gigapan is a company which assembles original images into large mosaics.

Gigapan doesn't assemble the images, people using their stitching software (or any other panorama-making software) can upload their own panoramas to their site, I have some of my own there.