It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Another Mars anomoly

page: 1
7
<<   2 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Nov, 9 2014 @ 11:04 AM
link   
Not a great deal to see but sure some here will find this worth watching. Add it to the pile...

(Not sure if the video is even mars?)

www.disclose.tv...




posted on Nov, 9 2014 @ 11:12 AM
link   
a reply to: and14263



It is odd looking but as you said, how do we know this photo wasn't taken on Earth? Why couldn't they just link the original NASA image to the article?



posted on Nov, 9 2014 @ 11:14 AM
link   
a reply to: Jennyfrenzy

Yeah that's what I thought. Video is on Youtube too, will try and embed.


edit on 9-11-2014 by and14263 because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 9 2014 @ 11:15 AM
link   
a reply to: and14263

Looks like a poorly photoshopped picture to me.



posted on Nov, 9 2014 @ 11:18 AM
link   

originally posted by: gortex
a reply to: and14263

Looks like a poorly photoshopped picture to me.


Perhaps you are correct.



posted on Nov, 9 2014 @ 11:22 AM
link   
My first thought: Spiders of Mars.

Who knows if we will ever find out?



posted on Nov, 9 2014 @ 11:22 AM
link   

originally posted by: gortex
a reply to: and14263

Looks like a poorly photoshopped picture to me.


Agreed ... why is the picture in perfect focus, except for the anomaly ...



posted on Nov, 9 2014 @ 11:24 AM
link   
They lost me when they said, "--is clearly not a rock."

Why would NASA release a blurry rock pic anyway? If there is content in a pic they don't want us to see they just withhold the pic, not "censor" it.



posted on Nov, 9 2014 @ 11:26 AM
link   
It's not clear what this object is, of course. The narrator seems to assume that glitches and the like do not occur when images are sent tens of millions of miles from Mars to Earth. They do, naturally.
If NASA wanted to conceal something in this image, wouldn't it have been simpler and more effective to simply withhold the image altogether ? Is it reasonable that they would, instead, apply blurring to a technological object in the picture, and in such an inept way that it still looks odd and eye-catching ?

Personally, I suspect that if NASA found an extraterrestrial building or machine on Mars, they'd allow it to be known. Their funding would shoot through the roof, as they were charged with the responsibility of investigating the object further, and looking for additional artifacts on Mars.
edit on 9-11-2014 by Ross 54 because: improved paragraph structure



posted on Nov, 9 2014 @ 11:36 AM
link   
Source image Gigapan
But I can't locate the original source image from Nasa.
Apparently, all the images were taken with Mastcam from sols 67-75.
Over to you guys..



posted on Nov, 9 2014 @ 11:46 AM
link   

originally posted by: Jennyfrenzy
a reply to: and14263



It is odd looking but as you said, how do we know this photo wasn't taken on Earth? Why couldn't they just link the original NASA image to the article?




.........




Now they are just getting lazy.



posted on Nov, 9 2014 @ 12:09 PM
link   
a reply to: NightFlight
Perhaps ask David Bowie, who saing about "the spiders from Mars." Just a thought.



posted on Nov, 9 2014 @ 12:16 PM
link   
Gosh.
I wonder why an image ID is not provided.



posted on Nov, 9 2014 @ 12:49 PM
link   
I guess the youtube poster is trying to imply that NASA smudged that part of the picture to hide something thay don`t want us to see.
if there was something there that they didn`t want us to see they would just not release the picture or at the very least they would do a much better job of removing the item from the picture.
I think the person who made the youtube is the one who purposely did a bad job of smudging a rock.



posted on Nov, 9 2014 @ 12:53 PM
link   
Not sure what gigapan is but this is the link to the source.

Source
edit on 9-11-2014 by boredsilly because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 9 2014 @ 12:58 PM
link   
a reply to: boredsilly

Gigapan is a company which assembles original images into large mosaics. That really doesn't help since the claim is that NASA has obfuscated something.



posted on Nov, 9 2014 @ 12:59 PM
link   
It's blurry because it's moving. I'm going with 'Martian Robo-crab'.



posted on Nov, 9 2014 @ 01:03 PM
link   
a reply to: Phage

It's pretty clear from the gigapan view though the smudged image is superimposed over the originals, there is a section that is brighter in the top right that includes the right of the smudged 'object'. That right piece should be brighter if part of the original, but it isn't.



posted on Nov, 9 2014 @ 01:06 PM
link   
Here we go. Here's one of the originals which was used for the mosaic. It's part of the rover. Close and out of focus.
mars.jpl.nasa.gov...

mars.jpl.nasa.gov...
edit on 11/9/2014 by Phage because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 9 2014 @ 01:22 PM
link   

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: boredsilly

Gigapan is a company which assembles original images into large mosaics.

Gigapan doesn't assemble the images, people using their stitching software (or any other panorama-making software) can upload their own panoramas to their site, I have some of my own there.




top topics



 
7
<<   2 >>

log in

join