posted on Nov, 9 2014 @ 08:03 AM
okay first off, it's lame that this guy is trying to name dark energy after him. Unless the guy is black as midnight.
I wouldn't suggest naming yourself after the guts of stars.
Also, These guys still believe in the big bang theory.
Want me to explain what the collider is doing? The outer layer of any given sub-atomic particle is defined sort of the same was as its expanded
counterpart the Atom. The particles in the atom follow along a linar path tho. And so generate the surface area through vibration.
These sub-atomic particles are made up of even smaller particles that bond together based on magnetic polarity.
There is no solid state for these particles because they cannot touch, It is the pull of these tiny north and south Proto- partcles.
People are going to need to drop the big bang theory in order to understand how energy is created in order for particles to be *charged*
Varying ammounts of internal charge effect the ability of a proto particle or a sub-atomic particle to bond with a nabouring cluster of particles.
Basically when you smash particles together, The intense interaction of these sub-atomic particles loosing stabability momentarily and rapidly
combining towards the linar path of motion can create one multipul different particles with signifigantly reduced imputes of energy that may seem to
bleep out of existance for some *unkown* reason when the reason is pretty obvious. The energy is spent.
Also what isn't mentioned is the power source for this collider? How much energy was present in the particles before launching them? Well since it's
not exactly a properly documented phenomenon ( Only the Aspect of Entropy and radation however interest the community)
It seems in a universe created by the big bang, Entropy has us beat. Radiation is not only what fuels life on Earth it is also what is slowly draining
the entire universe of energy. At least in the case of the big bang. But since It's not. And the universe relies on completely different mechanisms.
The implosions in space big enough to cause an Anchor are the ones that take a long time to finish. Once a black hole begins it's difficult for it to
close. That's because the traditional black hole has enough surface area to feed off enough decaying material that gets sucked into it.
The entire galaxy, the milkyway around us is pumping out tons of spent particles, Tons of radiation and any other outlets of energy pouring out
because of radioactive decay/entropy.
Getting back to what the particles they find in the collider. Basically since the energy is at a set ammount. The particles they create may not be
exactly the same as the next because the internal energy differences. Say, you can send a certain ammount of electrons into a copper wire for a
desired *voltage* It however does not increase the power of the individual electrons themselves. Just produces more in abaundance. And that is how we
So knowing this, The estimations will obviously seem mysterious when the sensors are displaying *unknown* energy ect.
Coming back to how energy is created in the first place. When decaying particles such as proto-electrons/ proto-protons / proto-neutrons.
A atom may hold a given number of electrons protons neutrons. And each of these sub-atomic particles have the proto- partcles i guess people call them
axioms? they are more like shards with north and south points. The shards themselves are what hold the charges, Collectively these particles are
governened by how much charge remains and can fly off and attach to nearby particles. Sometimes in a clump. And sometimes they clump up but the
general idea is that the bound up energy inside them is what causes the magnetic force to be generated.
When a black hole sucks in decaying matter it contains it, So it cannot move. The reason it cannot move is because the way physical mass assembles
itself is based off collect charge. So proto- electrons need to be bonded along with a neutron which carries the electron. But moving matter such as
light and energy can be electrons or protons or even sometimes neutrons themselves.
But these all rely on magnetic forces to achieve these collective states. Otherwise they would seemingly cease to exist. An atom cannot exist unless
an electron is orbiting it. And we wouldn't beable to tell the surface area unless it did because the particles are so tiny in comparison to how much
*space* they take up. For instance hypthetically speaking. They are the lid on a 5 gallon jug. The jug is the space the atom takes. Where as the lid
is the actual space of the particles themselves when not moving. But in reality the lid would be barly visible compared to the size of the jug.
So knowing that atoms require movment of polarized magnetic force such as all the proto-particles spinning in one specfic direction. That matter
interacting only does so because of proper polarized magnetic activity. If such a particle as *black matter* *black energy* is forced together so
that even these very basic tiny particles cannot align along their north and south poles then the particle cannot spin. So has little effect on
physical matter as far as stealing energy.
If a particle cannot move, then tension will rise. As the particle tries to expand it builds up energy, This is where energy comes from. There are
literal physical objects but they are much to tiny and do not reflect the image of what we see as a whole simply because they move to fast and
generate surface area. Like if the flash were to run in circles. It would look like a cyclone but we know it's just one person. So in theory black
matter would actually be several times smaller than regular matter. The only reason why a black hole has so much suction power is because its a
The rate of implosion is constant because they are constantly absorbing spent decaying proto-particles/sub-atomic particles and atoms. Since a
particle can only get so small, there's no room for anymore. Simply because black matter is at its ultimate combined state. The pull of the particles
magnetic force is so strong it closes itself off becoming a passive particle.
Passive particles cannot become subject to magnetic fusion as there is no charge present, No spinning movement. Think of it like a microwave. When you
microwave dehydrated food it will have no effect. 0 moisture will cause sparks.
Just like in a black hole, These sparks are seen as emitting gamma-rays. At the same time. The flow of the current of passive particles causes the
jetstreams to emerge. Escaping passive particles as well as the *sparks* being generated spew out of the north and south poles of a galaxy. Decaying
material is being drawn in, So as this jet stream shoots out. These passive particles nudge the incoming decaying material. Some of it gets caught in
the streams and lights up because it is pinning off of highly dense areas of passive particles. The density is what we would describe as dark matter.
Until the passive particles are thinned out it then becomes dark energy. As the difference is in how much % takes up*space* Black holes have dense
amounts of *black matter* But black matter itself is rare in such a case... because its strickly made on a situational basis like in the case of a
black hole where passive particles are created and spew from.
If this process didn't exist then bound up energy would be a problem to explain. And also to mention all the paradoxs of trying.