It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

INCREDIBLE UFO?? **Circling Airport And Entering Ocean ...

page: 1
12
<<   2 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Nov, 8 2014 @ 12:57 PM
link   
Not sure what to make of this video and as i know nothing of CGI maybe some of you guys could investigate further..Cheers. S




posted on Nov, 8 2014 @ 01:11 PM
link   
Interesting footage. I've not seen that before.



posted on Nov, 8 2014 @ 01:13 PM
link   
"All original audio is muted" in order to avoid hearing what is being said about what is being seen. Instead of providing more information, less is provided.


Interesting how the camera somehow tracks the object while it is "submerged."

edit on 11/8/2014 by Phage because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 8 2014 @ 01:16 PM
link   
a reply to: Soloprotocol

This was posted earlier this year , believe the UFO may be a balloon.
www.abovetopsecret.com...



posted on Nov, 8 2014 @ 01:20 PM
link   

originally posted by: Phage
"All original audio is muted" in order to avoid hearing what is being said about what is being seen. Instead of providing more information, less is provided.


Interesting how the camera somehow tracks the object while it is "submerged."

oh i'm a bit suspicious of any UFO video that has been altered to "protect the identity" of the person who released it, but i'm sure you will agree that if your life/job/liberty was on the line and you had taken and released footage that was strictly verboten you could forgive whoever for doing so.



posted on Nov, 8 2014 @ 01:24 PM
link   

originally posted by: gortex
a reply to: Soloprotocol

This was posted earlier this year , believe the UFO may be a balloon.
www.abovetopsecret.com...


Yeah seems like the same Video. The one i posted seems to have more of a story to it though. Cheers anyway, didn't realise that it had been posted before...I did a search using the Video header and nothing came up.



posted on Nov, 8 2014 @ 01:27 PM
link   
a reply to: Soloprotocol

Presumably the authorities know the source of the video, since the video comes from the authorities. The authorities know who was present when the video was taken.

"Leaking" the video on youtube doesn't do much to "protect" anyone. If anyone was going to be busted it wouldn't matter if there were voices on the video.

Removing the audio provides less information. Information that the youtube poster has but will not provide. Why do you suppose?

edit on 11/8/2014 by Phage because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 8 2014 @ 01:31 PM
link   
We all know what blurds are, what do we call Infra Red birds again?



posted on Nov, 8 2014 @ 01:34 PM
link   
a reply to: Phage

Could be anyone who had access to it which is more people then the pilots.



posted on Nov, 8 2014 @ 01:35 PM
link   

originally posted by: intrptr
We all know what blurds are, what do we call Infra Red birds again?

As it says in the Video Black = Hot...if it's a Balloon it's a very fast and hot Balloon, or very close to the camera, but it appears to go behind buildings so that would rule out close proximity to the camera.

I'm more interested to know if it's CGI or something else.



posted on Nov, 8 2014 @ 01:37 PM
link   
a reply to: tavi45

You missed my point. How does removing the voices protect anyone? The authorities know whose voices they are already.

The claim that is for the "protection" of anyone is bogus.
edit on 11/8/2014 by Phage because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 8 2014 @ 01:46 PM
link   

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: tavi45

You missed my point. How does removing the voices protect anyone? The authorities know whose voices they are already.

The claim that is for the "protection" of anyone is bogus.

Probability high.



posted on Nov, 8 2014 @ 01:54 PM
link   
a reply to: Soloprotocol


I'm more interested to know if it's CGI or something else.

You're more interested in it being labeled an "Incredible UFO", I know.

I read your thread title.



posted on Nov, 8 2014 @ 01:58 PM
link   

originally posted by: intrptr
a reply to: Soloprotocol


I'm more interested to know if it's CGI or something else.

You're more interested in it being labeled an "Incredible UFO", I know.

I read your thread title.


I just copied and pasted the original header. dont see why i should have changed it. So sorry if it's not incredible enough for you.
edit on 8-11-2014 by Soloprotocol because: (no reason given)

edit on 8-11-2014 by Soloprotocol because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 8 2014 @ 02:06 PM
link   
a reply to: Soloprotocol


So sorry if it's not incredible enough for you.

It doesn't "circle the airport" either. Never once changing its glide slope at "bird speed" it descends to water, splashes down next to another Infrabird and then they both take off together.

Or they are "UFO's" because we can't make out what they are.



posted on Nov, 8 2014 @ 02:11 PM
link   

originally posted by: Soloprotocol

originally posted by: intrptr
a reply to: Soloprotocol


I'm more interested to know if it's CGI or something else.

You're more interested in it being labeled an "Incredible UFO", I know.

I read your thread title.


I just copied and pasted the original header. dont see why i should have changed it. So sorry if it's not incredible enough for you.


But you added the question marks after 'Incredible UFO' didn't you?



posted on Nov, 8 2014 @ 02:25 PM
link   

originally posted by: Cobaltic1978

originally posted by: Soloprotocol

originally posted by: intrptr
a reply to: Soloprotocol


I'm more interested to know if it's CGI or something else.

You're more interested in it being labeled an "Incredible UFO", I know.

I read your thread title.


I just copied and pasted the original header. dont see why i should have changed it. So sorry if it's not incredible enough for you.


But you added the question marks after 'Incredible UFO' didn't you?

Yes because 100% of UFO's caught on camera are a ? as to what they are.



posted on Nov, 8 2014 @ 02:28 PM
link   

originally posted by: intrptr
a reply to: Soloprotocol


So sorry if it's not incredible enough for you.

It doesn't "circle the airport" either. Never once changing its glide slope at "bird speed" it descends to water, splashes down next to another Infrabird and then they both take off together.

Or they are "UFO's" because we can't make out what they are.

Sorry never once saw a flap of wings. I'm leaning more towards CGI or something added to the original video...Birds never even crossed my mind on this one. Make of it what you will...I'm oot.



posted on Nov, 8 2014 @ 02:50 PM
link   

originally posted by: Soloprotocol

originally posted by: Cobaltic1978

originally posted by: Soloprotocol

originally posted by: intrptr
a reply to: Soloprotocol


I'm more interested to know if it's CGI or something else.

You're more interested in it being labeled an "Incredible UFO", I know.

I read your thread title.


I just copied and pasted the original header. dont see why i should have changed it. So sorry if it's not incredible enough for you.


But you added the question marks after 'Incredible UFO' didn't you?

Yes because 100% of UFO's caught on camera are a ? as to what they are.


I appreciate that, but you claimed you never changed it, when clearly you did.

My two penny worth, I can't say they are birds as I don't see wings flapping. Whatever it is, it is generating heat, so I would suggest they aren't balloons. So, definitely UFO's, so no need for question marks.



posted on Nov, 8 2014 @ 02:53 PM
link   
a reply to: Cobaltic1978

Whatever it is, it is generating heat, so I would suggest they aren't balloons.
Are the runways "generating" heat? Or are they absorbing sunlight and emitting infrared?



new topics

top topics



 
12
<<   2 >>

log in

join