It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Gryphon66
Did I say "Augustus, you're just spinning the election" or not?
So now we're working by analogy, are we? Where you place your wagers are your own affair. The point is, neither you nor I have offered any evidence about the group of "non-voting non-registered" citizens. Until we have data, it's mere supposition.
I have the sense that you and I are basically in a philosophical debate rather than a factual or forensic one. Your point is that had the non-voters voted, the election results would be different than they are. I concede that point. You stated that there is no way to assign intent to the non-voters, which was my only real contention.
I think it would be interesting to try and research why the non-voting-non-registered folks are in that situation though.
Voting is a positive action and has an effect. Non-voting is a non-action and can only represent the absence of an effect.
But largely, it is obvious now that the difference in our positions is semantic.
Thanks for the reasonable and intelligent discussion!
originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus
a reply to: Gryphon66
Fair enough.
I just took a bit of umbrage with being cast in the role of 'election spinner', I am not a partisan supporter of either side.
originally posted by: Gryphon66
1. Nullification is a unsubstantiated, unconstitutional theory. It does not exist outside the minds of States Rights extremists.
2. As the REDMAP effort to gerrymander districts and capture State legislatures has been gaining ground for four years now, there is little surprise that the Republicans picked up seats in a Midterm year.
3. Regardless of these facts, I am excited to see what the Republicans will do. I'm looking forward to the Impeachment sideshow, both Chambers creating the permanent Joint Committee on Benghazi so that our grandchildren can also know what it's like to investigate Benghazi, the Federal Marriage Protection Act, the USA Belongs to Jesus Act, the We Stand Ready Compulsory Gun Carry Act (because the Constitution, ya know, doesn't SAY you don't have to carry a weapon) etc.
originally posted by: nwtrucker
a reply to: Skadi_the_Evil_Elf
But honestly, The U.S. version of Socialism is far more intrusive than any European equivalent.
The European version evolved over time.
The U.S. version is being rammed down our throats by a Federal gov't that 'knows' we need to be ruled over whether we like it or not.
None of Obama and Co.'s efforts where ever mandated beyond 'change'. The Affordable Care Act, Immigration issues, on and on.
You are now paying the price for that arrogance.
Fight Obama? YES. That's the mandate....Deal with it.
The Facts
The Bureau of Labor Statistics does show that there are nearly 92 million Americans out of the workforce. But dig into the numbers and it is clear that it’s silly to say all of these people are “on the sidelines” and need action from the president and the Congress.
This BLS document shows that the civilian noninstitutional population—essentially, people over the age of 16–is nearly 247 million. The civil labor force is 155 million, with a participation rate of 62.8 percent. So that leaves nearly 92 million “not in the labor force.” What does that mean?
Essentially, it means everyone above the age of 16 who is not working. The BLS breaks it down even further, and it quickly becomes clear that the vast majority of these people are retired or simply are not interested in working, such as stay-at-home parents.
The lesson here is that despite what is broadly presumed by economists and the punditry, the Fed can’t force money into the economy, nor can it increase “money supply.” Money supply is demand determined, and with the economy still relatively weak, there’s very little demand for the dollar credit that’s been expanded by Fed purchases of bank assets.
What about the supposed “money printing” by the Fed? There’s once again no such thing occurring. Instead, the Fed is able to engage in its program of quantitative easing thanks to its 25 basis point payments for bank reserves. With the funds borrowed from banks, the Fed has the means to purchase all manner of Treasuries and mortgage bonds.
It is conventional wisdom that printing more money causes inflation. This is why we are seeing so many warnings today of how Quantitative Easing I and II and the federal government’s deficit are about to lead to skyrocketing prices. The only problem is, it’s not true. That’s not how inflation works. Hence, this is yet another of the false alarms being raised (along with the need to balance the budget) that is preventing us from doing what we need to do to recover from the worse recession since the Great Depression.
originally posted by: nwtrucker
a reply to: Skadi_the_Evil_Elf
Sorry, my hard drive is screwed..
Cont'd.
Therefore, I cannot speak for all voters, having said that, stopping Obama is the singularly most important first step in any real and lasting recovery. IMO.
It is my mandate. There really is no other option to preserving the Founding Father's vision.
As far as health care goes, it belongs in a State by State choice, not enforced by a Federal gov't in clear violation of the 10th.