It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Don't think, just vote Democrat. Then reward yourself with fried chicken!

page: 9
19
<< 6  7  8    10  11 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Nov, 7 2014 @ 06:35 AM
link   
Ooooh, fried chicken sounds good. I didn't vote but I can still have fried chicken.




posted on Nov, 7 2014 @ 06:36 AM
link   

originally posted by: rickymouse
Ooooh, fried chicken sounds good. I didn't vote but I can still have fried chicken.


... and you don't even need anyone's "permission" ...

Christonacrutch.



posted on Nov, 7 2014 @ 06:40 AM
link   
a reply to: butcherguy

What a surprise, another misinterpretation. I am not giving you permission to talk, I´m encouraging you to talk.



posted on Nov, 7 2014 @ 06:41 AM
link   
a reply to: ManBehindTheMask

Don't worry friend, I always tell myself: people who think like that are the most likely to be culled when the S hits the F. I'd think "THEY" (lol) would be the least prepared given "THEY" (lol) believe everything this administration says as the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth.



posted on Nov, 7 2014 @ 06:46 AM
link   
a reply to: Snarl




Purdy much. She's burned up all of her currency as 'an underdog'.


So you admit that it´s open season on her, no matter what was said and in what context. Good, by your own admission you can not be taken serious in this discussion of the threads´topic because you are extremely biased.



posted on Nov, 7 2014 @ 06:49 AM
link   
it is clear that voting is not working and both parties work for the bankster or the highest bidder so nothing will change.

Direct action is the only thing these criminals will listen too and many need to swing from the end of a rope for all the murder and mass deaths they have committed just to fill their pockets.



posted on Nov, 7 2014 @ 06:49 AM
link   
a reply to: HappyThoughts


So you admit that it´s open season on her


Nah. I wouldn't say "open season" exactly ... but, you get what you're asking for when you voluntarily step directly in front of a firing squad.

edit on 7112014 by Snarl because: Emoticon



posted on Nov, 7 2014 @ 07:10 AM
link   

originally posted by: SLAYER69

Obama responded, “Absolutely. I give everyone full permission to eat some fried chicken after they vote.



No pancakes?

Hey, she said it, might as well make the meal complete.

A good friend of mine turned me on to that combo...


Ahem! fried chicken is all fine and dandy but I like mine Jerked if you please keep the pancakes give me a side order of fried dumplings..hold the ketchup pass di rum..



posted on Nov, 7 2014 @ 07:16 AM
link   
a reply to: HappyThoughts

Yes, I 'misinterpreted' your use of the word 'letting'.



posted on Nov, 7 2014 @ 07:31 AM
link   
a reply to: butcherguy

Are you saying that there is only one possible interpretation of the word "letting"?

Please keep it comin'.



posted on Nov, 7 2014 @ 07:50 AM
link   
Does it still count as a "firing squad" when it chases you everywhere you go, day and night, ready to take potshots at any opportunity?

Just a general question ...



posted on Nov, 7 2014 @ 07:56 AM
link   

originally posted by: HappyThoughts
a reply to: butcherguy

Are you saying that there is only one possible interpretation of the word "letting"?

Please keep it comin'.

I wouldn't want to displease you...so,
No I am not saying that there is one definition.
But since there is more than one, and I misinterpreted, it would be helpful if you let me know which definition you were relying on when you used it.
I will suppose that it is not the one that I just used, or the one that relates to leasing property.
It isn't the one associated with clothing, is it?
edit on bu302014-11-07T07:57:06-06:0007America/ChicagoFri, 07 Nov 2014 07:57:06 -06007u14 by butcherguy because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 7 2014 @ 08:08 AM
link   
a reply to: butcherguy

I think he gave you one.

he was encouraging you to talk by responding to you, in a manner that's having you dig yourself deeper.



posted on Nov, 7 2014 @ 08:10 AM
link   
a reply to: ManBehindTheMask

eh, so you're offended because of double-standards.

fair enough...



posted on Nov, 7 2014 @ 08:17 AM
link   
a reply to: HappyThoughts

Ever notice how touchy our friends on the right can be about simple figures of speech?

They can call Democrats everything but reasonable hard-working adults ... but let one ordinary way of saying something rube, er, rub them the wrong way, and all discussion falls to the wayside.

Funny, eh?

Mrs. Obama has her faults, just as Mrs. Bush, Mrs. Clinton, Mrs. Bush, Mrs. Reagan, etc. etc. etc. did.

But having a bit of fun with stereotypes, at worst, is hardly a world-shattering event.



posted on Nov, 7 2014 @ 08:19 AM
link   

originally posted by: NonsensicalUserName
a reply to: butcherguy

I think he gave you one.

he was encouraging you to talk by responding to you, in a manner that's having you dig yourself deeper.

When used to encourage, it is still in the sense of allowing.



posted on Nov, 7 2014 @ 08:33 AM
link   
Goodness, when did Republicans get so thin-skinned?

Lately, y'all are whining about word choice like a bunch of danged politically correct Democrats.

Sheesh.



posted on Nov, 7 2014 @ 08:37 AM
link   

originally posted by: ManBehindTheMask
IT doesnt matter if they were offended or not........

The point is if it was said by a white person, there would be an outrage and you know it....


Is that the point? If so, I agree with you. It probably would have been totally different if a white person said it to a black audience. I'm not arguing that at all. If a white person said it to a white audience, however, it would be totally fine.

But that's not the point of everyone... or anyone that I've been talking with here.
edit on 11/7/2014 by Benevolent Heretic because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 7 2014 @ 08:38 AM
link   
a reply to: Gryphon66
I would think that you would want the Republicans to emulate you.



posted on Nov, 7 2014 @ 09:18 AM
link   
a reply to: butcherguy




I will suppose that it is not the one that I just used, or the one that relates to leasing property. It isn't the one associated with clothing, is it?


Omg, I bet you actually googled the word "letting" when it was to clear to anyone with half a brain that I meant that I was just going to ask questions and "let" you guys do the talking.

It's just a figure of speech you genius.




No I am not saying that there is one definition. But since there is more than one, and I misinterpreted, it would be helpful if you let me know which definition you were relying on when you used it.


I didn't say definition, I said interpretation.
edit on 7-11-2014 by HappyThoughts because: (no reason given)




top topics



 
19
<< 6  7  8    10  11 >>

log in

join