What interests me about Giza is firstly the complete tosh which is offered in regards who and how it was built, and then the massive leaps of
illogical thinking which allows so many people to blindly accept it.
Its a case in point for you fantastic mainstream ideas can be and yet how easily people swallow any "official line"
The total mass of the pyramid is estimated at 5.9 million tonnes. The volume, including an internal hillock, is believed to be roughly 2,500,000
cubic meters.[6] Based on these estimates building this in 20 years would involve installing aproximatly 800 tonnes of stone every day. Manetho gives
Khufu a reign of 65 years. This would enable him to build the pyramid by installing aproximatly 250 tonnes of stone per day.
First of all this equates to a TONNE of stone every 1.8 minutes, 24 hours a day for 20 years. Completely rediculous given the times, the technology
and the manpower available. Even in modern times we would struggle to make a stone of that size every 1.8 minutes, its totally unthinkable.
This would mean that at all times 800 tonnes of stone had to be ready and avialable 24 hours a day, which beggars belief.
Not only that, the pyramid and the second pyramid are perfectly alines less than an 3 arc minites to true North. How did they manage that? Clearly a
precisions engineering job and yet it was slung together a tonne of stone every 1.8 minutes???
The accuracy of the pyramid's workmanship is such that the four sides of the base have a mean error of only 58 millimeter in length, and 1 minute
in angle from a perfect square.The base is horizontal and flat to within 15 mm. The sides of the square are closely aligned to the four cardinal
compass points (within 3 minutes of arc based on true north not magnetic north).These proportions equate to 2π to an accuracy of better than 0.05%
which some Egyptologists consider to have been the result of deliberate design proportion. Verner wrote, "We can conclude that although the ancient
Egyptians could not precisely define the value of π, in practise they used it".[
Modern tolerance is 6cm I believe, thats with all our technology and our very best engineers and tools and yet somehow the egyptians throwing together
a bundle of stones at a rate of knots were achieving engineering perfection?
Basically we are suggesting that without carts or wheeled movement they moved 6 million tonnes of stone from goodness knows where, in some freak
fashion that even mainstream studies cant justify. On top of this they somehow calculated true north to near perfection, line the pyramids to it and
to each other using skills completely unavailable to them, they managed to do better engineering work than modern engineers, and built it in a
timeframe that is freakishly impossible.
Ohh and it has LESS subsidance than any modern building, meaning they would have to have had an exquisite understanding of geology and foundation
which in those days didnt exist either and even with it, modern engineers cant match that fractional settling of modern buildings.
I mean, hello? Sanity please, its a story with so many gaping holes it might as well be called a gaping hole and not a story at all.
Yet, somehow people nod their heads and swallow it as true?
Its even more amusing that they claim pyramids were tombs, but in actual fact most known Pharoes were not even buried in their pyramids, they were
buried in completely different tombs in many cases, I believe in the whole Giza complex only one minor person was ever buried there.
So basically the position is that they can figure out how it was built, who built it, when they built it or why they built it, but it was of course
built by the egyptians when they say so?

Rock on mainstream thinking, got to love it when a plan comes together.
Meanwhile in the real world we still have no clue at all who, when or why these pyramids were built.
Conveniently there are no records of the building, no evidence of the debris from building and even more telling no evidence of the hundreds of
thousands of tools and equipment that would have been required.
You can dig up a stone age village and find a proportional amount of tools, and yet on a project where hundreds of thousands of tools and masses of
equipment were needed, you dont find any evidence of them? Reality check time, I think someone needs a serious rethink and investigation into these
pyramids in order to have a remote clue about them.
Its very doubtful even NOW with all the equipment we have we could complete the work to match their level of precision in the time frame.
[edit on 1-11-2008 by silver6ix]