It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: TinfoilTP
originally posted by: WhiteAlice
originally posted by: TinfoilTP
originally posted by: Hefficide
a reply to: TinfoilTP
Then why is there this?
I like this doozey, Al Frankin's stealing money from the 1990 Child Care Act to give to the Indians.
On the Amendment S.Amdt. 2822: Franken Amdt. No. 2822; To reserve not less than 2 percent of the amount appropriated under the Child Care and Development Block Grant Act of 1990 in each fiscal year for payments to Indian tribes and tribal organizations.
High priority stuff man, you must be proud.
2% going to the tribes and tribal organizations. You're whining about 2% going to Native Americans. Umm, did you know that Native Americans have children, too? Seriously, they do. They have children and well, things between the tribes and the federal government are handled a bit differently from the states as the tribes have partial sovereignty. Still, it's 2%. That meant 98% of the appropriated funds went everywhere else BUT the tribes. I guess you're probably screaming that 2% was too much for a population whose demographic is 1% of the population. However, considering a few other circumstances, I can give them that extra 1%.
You are a strange bird.
It's just handing it over to them, they won't buy baby formula they will build more casinos.
originally posted by: beezzer
a reply to: nenothtu
When you start with caps, then, in effect, aren't you qualifying "freedom of speech"?
originally posted by: OpinionatedB
a reply to: nenothtu
If we had enough money we could make an advertisement to tell the politicians what we expect of them... it seems they watch tv..
originally posted by: nenothtu
originally posted by: TinfoilTP
originally posted by: WhiteAlice
originally posted by: TinfoilTP
originally posted by: Hefficide
a reply to: TinfoilTP
Then why is there this?
I like this doozey, Al Frankin's stealing money from the 1990 Child Care Act to give to the Indians.
On the Amendment S.Amdt. 2822: Franken Amdt. No. 2822; To reserve not less than 2 percent of the amount appropriated under the Child Care and Development Block Grant Act of 1990 in each fiscal year for payments to Indian tribes and tribal organizations.
High priority stuff man, you must be proud.
2% going to the tribes and tribal organizations. You're whining about 2% going to Native Americans. Umm, did you know that Native Americans have children, too? Seriously, they do. They have children and well, things between the tribes and the federal government are handled a bit differently from the states as the tribes have partial sovereignty. Still, it's 2%. That meant 98% of the appropriated funds went everywhere else BUT the tribes. I guess you're probably screaming that 2% was too much for a population whose demographic is 1% of the population. However, considering a few other circumstances, I can give them that extra 1%.
You are a strange bird.
It's just handing it over to them, they won't buy baby formula they will build more casinos.
It's their money, to do with as they see fit. You wouldn't much care to have an Indian come up to you and start dictating how you spend YOUR money, would you?
Your government promised them that money to induce them to give up their entire way of life.
I'd say they've earned it.
originally posted by: TinfoilTP
Go give them all your money then, don't have some liberal weasel steal money designated for Child Care back in 1990 steal for your cause.
originally posted by: Hefficide
But, my God, what we have done in our folly.