Democrats Caught Posing as Republican Election Judges in Colorado!

a reply to: neo96

Oh FFS! People should limit their free speech and not call out perceived injustices because to do so is akin to hanging rich folks from trees like people used to do black folks? Are you fking serious? I hope you don't think wearing earplugs at the firing range is nannyist but it might explain why your brain is leaking out of your GD ears.

a reply to: neo96

No one's taking their property or rights of the rich. I must have missed that as well.

Oh, I see what's going on here. You're trying to play the victim card at the same time as being politically partisan.

It's ok Neo. I don't pull this out very often, but when I do...it's just for you.

a reply to: neo96

So it's ok to sell a firearm to a 7yr old?

Perhaps that is where we differ Neo. Common sense.

Neo, I just realized something, by your descriptions of your political beliefs, you're not a Republican or even a Libertarian ...

You're an ANARCHIST ... which means, essentially at least in the classic political definitions ...

You're further to the Left than ANY of US.

I beg your pardon all, I think I just wet myself from laughing. Must change.

originally posted by: sheepslayer247
a reply to: neo96

So it's ok to sell a firearm to a 7yr old?

Perhaps that is where we differ Neo. Common sense.

How would a 7 year old kid get the money?

originally posted by: thesaneone

originally posted by: sheepslayer247
a reply to: neo96

So it's ok to sell a firearm to a 7yr old?

Perhaps that is where we differ Neo. Common sense.

How would a 7 year old kid get the money?

Capitalism baby!

Would you sell a firearm to a 7yr old?

originally posted by: Kali74
a reply to: neo96

Oh FFS! People should limit their free speech and not call out perceived injustices because to do so is akin to hanging rich folks from trees like people used to do black folks? Are you fking serious? I hope you don't think wearing earplugs at the firing range is nannyist but it might explain why your brain is leaking out of your GD ears.

I guess someone missed Occupy with the guillotines, and saying off with their heads.

originally posted by: sheepslayer247

originally posted by: thesaneone

originally posted by: sheepslayer247
a reply to: neo96

So it's ok to sell a firearm to a 7yr old?

Perhaps that is where we differ Neo. Common sense.

How would a 7 year old kid get the money?

Capitalism baby!

Would you sell a firearm to a 7yr old?

Yes but I wouldn't sell ammo in my gun store.

a reply to: sheepslayer247

No one's taking their property or rights of the rich. I must have missed that as well.

That's right they aren't, and they should be.

Because guns, and money are the same thing.

Property rights.

Oh, I see what's going on here. You're trying to play the victim card at the same time as being politically partisan.

That's funny.

I saw the poor little smokers victim card.

The evil rich folks don't pay their fair share because the mobs are just 'victims'.

Hell the GD entire Democrat plays the victim card.

I always love getting called 'partisan' !

That's more the pot calling the kettle.

originally posted by: Gryphon66
Neo, I just realized something, by your descriptions of your political beliefs, you're not a Republican or even a Libertarian ...

You're an ANARCHIST ... which means, essentially at least in the classic political definitions ...

You're further to the Left than ANY of US.

I beg your pardon all, I think I just wet myself from laughing. Must change.

Nope I don't believe in social programs.

Hell if I ever run for congress my platform is going to be a 'free gun' for everyone who wants one.

I am going to create a massive government program that is going to run trillions of dollars.

Then I am going to create more taxes to pay for it to line firearm manufactures pockets.

LOOOOOOOOOL.

originally posted by: sheepslayer247
a reply to: neo96

So it's ok to sell a firearm to a 7yr old?

Perhaps that is where we differ Neo. Common sense.

Yo.

Who the hell would sell a gun to a 7 year old in the first place ?

But at the same time it is easier for a 7 year old to get weed than a gun.

a reply to: neo96

Ok, now you're just ranting and not really making sense.

As far as partisan, let me just say that I hold all parties and politicians to the same criteria. It just seems that I spend more time combating the lunacy of a certain party, that I am still a registered member of, that seems to have been taken over by insane, religious zealots that do nothing but cry about being victims of the evil left....when they are victims of their own ignorance and stupidity.

a reply to: sheepslayer247

Ok, now you're just ranting and not really making sense.

I am sure pointing out the fallacy of being pro weed, and selective gun rights wouldn't make any sense..

As far as partisan, let me just say that I hold all parties and politicians to the same criteria.

LOL.

Right!.

a reply to: neo96

Did they actually do it. No and they wouldn't. Did black people actually get hung from trees? Yes and the threat of it is still very present.

Nobody plays victim better or more often than you do Neo.

originally posted by: Kali74
a reply to: neo96

Did they actually do it. No and they wouldn't. Did black people actually get hung from trees? Yes and the threat of it is still very present.

Nobody plays victim better or more often than you do Neo.

Never heard of the French and Russian revolutions there Kali ?

Just how far away do you think the US is away from that.

When the fires of bigotry, and hatred keep getting stoked with the fair share, and income inequality, and living wage BULLSNIP ?

a reply to: Gryphon66

I'm glad I have a better understanding of why you appear to be so confused sometimes.

a reply to: neo96

No, you stated that you believe that:

originally posted by: neo96

There is nothing common sense about regulation.

Because ALL regulation punishes those who do nothing wrong.

So, it's safe to say you're against regulation, all regulation, which, by extension, covers rules, laws, acts of government, etc.

Here's the definition of ANARCHY, btw:

1. a state of disorder due to absence or nonrecognition of authority.

2. absence of government and absolute freedom of the individual, regarded as a political ideal.

synonyms: lawlessness, nihilism, mobocracy, revolution, insurrection, disorder, chaos, mayhem, tumult, turmoil

antonyms: government, order

And notice I said classically Left ... not this mumbo-jumbo definition that is in common use today that means "Democrat"

The term was later applied to a number of movements, especially republicanism during the French Revolution, socialism, communism, and anarchism.

Bold emphasis, mine.

Source: The Black Flame: The Revolutionary Class Politics of Anarchism and Syndicalism

a reply to: xuenchen

Well, don't hold back Xuenchen ... explain it to us!

I'm sure it's as relevant and on-topic as most of your commentary is.

a reply to: neo96

What's wrong with that. Maybe after a few heads start to roll some of the corrupt muthaf*ckas will clean up their act a bit. Be it the corrupt pieces of sh*t in Government, Law Enforcement, Banking, etc.

Seems that is the only way anyone listens to anyone anymore after all. Look at how much air time ISIS gets when they "Trim the Head-ges".

LOL

(I'm only somewhat serious about all that. Somewhere between 1%-100%.)

a reply to: Gryphon66

So, it's safe to say you're against regulation, all regulation, which, by extension, covers rules, laws, acts of government, etc.

I suppose to since regulation doesn't stop anything. It only punishes after the fact, and punishes those who don't do anything.

Which creates the biggest scam where the lawyers, and the polticians make billions off of.

And notice I said classically Left ... not this mumbo-jumbo definition that is in common use today that means "Democrat"

That isn't what my critics have been saying for the past 4 years.

Been called every name in the book mostly 'right wing' and fascist.

Truth is I don't know what I am anymore.