It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Willtell
a reply to: NavyDoc
That exactly is Macroeconomics just what the name implies
What in the world are you talking about.
When rich folks use huge amount of capital and order around their puppets they influence the MACRO( WHOLE) economy to benefit themselves to the detriment of the whole...
MACRO
large-scale; overall.
"the analysis of social events at the macro level"
originally posted by: tavi45
a reply to: darkorange
Dude most Americans dont care at all about the deaths of foreigners unless they are our proven allies. Even with allies it's not a guarantee. I bet if France had a 9/11 a huge number of Americans would say "those froggies deserve it for being weak on Muslims and being such wusses in general".
They can't bring themselves to care about their neighbors let alone foreigners. Hell most people I know wouldn't even give their sibling a place to sleep if they lost everything. Most Americans are concerned with preserving their own little bubble of fantasy. That's why America is failing. A nation with no qualities besides selfishness and greed cannot survive long. Ayn Rand is the biggest joke in history and many still treat her as a Jesus figure.
It's a mad mad world.
originally posted by: Willtell
a reply to: AugustusMasonicus
“Rich policies” are when the politicians vote them tax cuts at the expense of the macro economy
When they have enough to feed the US army and more with one weeks pay
And the average American can hardly survive and the income levels of the MC and poor are steadily declining as well as good job opportunities, middle class jobs go overseas where the RICH send their business to countries where they can pay a dollar an hour
The senate passes a bill to stop that and the GOP votes the bill down
Those are “rich man” policies
When the politicians cater to the individual wealthy and not the macro economy.
The rich policy is to continue to coddle those who have too much
And let the poor die.
Like Christie cut Medicaid
It’s amazing that people don’t understand that rich people, while they shouldn’t be abused or treated unfairly, should nonetheless pay their fair share
Why are you so interested in defending them unless you yourself are one of them?
And if you are then why do you need so much to live.
originally posted by: tavi45
a reply to: raymundoko
That's directly counter to everything I've ever read on the matter. Romney even said he pays less taxes than his secretary.
Please provide a source for your figures.
originally posted by: diggindirt
originally posted by: Willtell
a reply to: AugustusMasonicus
“Rich policies” are when the politicians vote them tax cuts at the expense of the macro economy
When they have enough to feed the US army and more with one weeks pay
And the average American can hardly survive and the income levels of the MC and poor are steadily declining as well as good job opportunities, middle class jobs go overseas where the RICH send their business to countries where they can pay a dollar an hour
The senate passes a bill to stop that and the GOP votes the bill down
Those are “rich man” policies
When the politicians cater to the individual wealthy and not the macro economy.
The rich policy is to continue to coddle those who have too much
And let the poor die.
Like Christie cut Medicaid
It’s amazing that people don’t understand that rich people, while they shouldn’t be abused or treated unfairly, should nonetheless pay their fair share
Why are you so interested in defending them unless you yourself are one of them?
And if you are then why do you need so much to live.
While I agree with much of your sentiment, I really, really need you to give me some concrete definitions and numbers before I can agree to do a total wash-basket turn-over.
What is rich? I need a number here---not some vague "more than is needed" but an actual number. Is a it a million dollars in assets? Is it an income of a million dollars?
What is fair share? Again, I need a number here---how much is enough for me to be forced to give up? Is 50% of my income enough?
I have begged for these answers from politicians and political hacks for years. I've never been able to get an answer. Just how much of our income should be forcibly taken from us? What is the upper limit?
I hear all this complaining about "the rich" and yet nobody can give me a number of what constitutes "the rich."
In my world I am rich indeed because I no longer have to wonder if I'll be able to pay my bills at the beginning of each month. But I have a neighbor who is a multimillionaire due to having created a software company as a hobby that he sold for piles of money. Why should he have to pay a higher percentage of his income than me? He uses no more services than I do.
Another friend is retired from professional sports. Because he was particularly talented at his sport, he is a millionaire. Then there's the friend who made it big in Hollywood and is paid about a million dollars each time he walks in front of the camera.
Why should they have to give up a greater percentage of their income than those of us who haven't made millions?
I really struggle to understand why a lot of people are so fixated on "the rich" and yet can't define the very object of their fixation.
I'm with Augustus on the flat tax. To me that seems "fair" as "fair" was defined by my Mama when I was young.
I see the rabid consumerism and accumulation of debt due to that predilection has more to do with the condition of the middle class than anything the politicians have done.
My parents didn't crawl out of poverty using debt. I didn't crawl out of poverty by using debt. Somewhere along the way, the majority of the American public became convinced that they must bow to the bankers and go into debt for their morning coffee or a vacation. Politicians didn't make them take out a second mortgage to buy a SeaDoo.
So let me ask you this---how much are you willing to give up? What is your upper limit for how much of your income you are willing to hand over to the politicians to spend for you?
The decline of the middle class can be traced to the lax manner in which they have used credit over the past 30-40 years. The debt problem brings on another issue---because they are paying interest on a vacation they took last year on their credit card, they have no disposable income to contribute to a rainy day or retirement fund.
originally posted by: Willtell
a reply to: NavyDoc
Nobody said macroeconomics had anything inherently to do with the rich.
I just said they negatively influence macroeconomics through their immense wealth.