It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: N3k9Ni
I wonder where Mr. Vazquez got the information to make these claims other than his own backside.
I don't think stabbing people with syringes is a viable delivery system. It would be a slow process requiring close proximity unless they throw them like darts.
An infected member spreading the virus would be more likely. Affecting enough people to make a significant difference would be hard unless they walk around spitting on people or kissing everyone on the mouth.
Sounds more the ravings of paranoia to me.
My personal belief is that this virus could definately be used by some terror group to do such acts but whether ISIS have the Virus is another question.
originally posted by: dianajune
With all that ISIS has done, inc. the beheading of children, they are capable of spreading Ebola. But how?
I heard it's difficult to weaponize. Others have said what we are seeing now is weaponized. Go figure.
On the other hand, they could send jihadists to West Africa to contract the virus on purpose, then fly wherever to spread it. But how much damage could they do before being rendered too ill to lift a finger?
Could they put it in the water supply? And if so, what would they use? Blood samples from Ebola patients?
originally posted by: HappyThoughts
a reply to: TruthxIsxInxThexMist
You could have just edited your first post!
Wtf are you going on about. Why would I add 3 separate tangents in one post? Why are you even bothered by something so trivial? What do you suggest my intention was then?
But anyway...attacking a Country via EB Injection is quite possible indeed. By Injection or via someone running around with the virus!
Why are you getting angry?