It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: ServantOfTheLamb
The theist can justify inductive reasoning, and therefore none of that is an issues for the theist.
You quoted him. But now that i pointed out what his quote meant, it's not important anymore? Come on.
Inductive reasoning requires that you have evidence to induct your reasoning from. It in itself is certainly not evidence for god. You would still have to find and present this god to examine so that you could use inductive reasoning. What is so hard to understand about this? It says so in your OP.
About turning your car? The reasoning comes from actually studying the physical mechanical parts of a car to deduce how it works. Where is the god so that we can study him and compare him to your claims.
I spent just shy of 30 years of my life preaching, teaching, and witnessing "for Christ". Make sure you never examine your version of xtianity objectively, because you might just find yourself thinking thoughts you aren't allowed to think.
originally posted by: ServantOfTheLamb
a reply to: Klassified
I spent just shy of 30 years of my life preaching, teaching, and witnessing "for Christ". Make sure you never examine your version of xtianity objectively, because you might just find yourself thinking thoughts you aren't allowed to think.
Just because you decided to turn your back on God doesn't make it untrue.Just because I am here telling people they are wrong, doesn't mean that I am not following Jesus's message. Actually Jesus did that all the time.
That is exactly what i just said and it is absurd.
You know dogs exist because we see them. We know dinosaurs used to exist because we see their bones. We do not see god. Therefore to make claims of his existence would be absurd.
God exist because denial of his existence leads you to a point in which you cannot logically justify your belief in anything in everyday life(absurdity). God exist because of a Reductio Ad Absurdum.
Does the presupposition of unicorns prove the exisistence of magical single horned horses?
Your argument is that god is real because you can't imagine it any other way and you think it is absurd to think otherwise. There is a huge difference. The argument you are actually using is the argument from ignorance. You can't imagine a world without a god therefor you find it absurd to deny him
Does the presupposition of unicorns prove the exisistence of magical single horned horses?
Your argument is that god is real because you can't imagine it any other way and you think it is absurd to think otherwise. There is a huge difference. The argument you are actually using is the argument from ignorance. You can't imagine a world without a god therefor you find it absurd to deny him
originally posted by: AlephBet
a reply to: Rex282
Quote me, then refute what I have said with scripture.