It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Has America Nuked Syria?

page: 2
32
<< 1    3  4 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Oct, 29 2014 @ 06:09 AM
link   
a reply to: Xeven

No it's bush or clinton.

Don't worry though. They will both be against continuing operations in Afghanistan. Too much poppy there now that the Taliban is out of the way.

I'm sure they will both pledge "no boots on the ground" in Syria and we will have boots on the ground when Hillary is reelected.




posted on Oct, 29 2014 @ 06:14 AM
link   

originally posted by: ArmyOfNobunaga
a reply to: Zcustosmorum

Lol
Sure


And every other nation in the world with satellites are being quiet about it.



I can just see Putin telling his cabinet "yes comrades let's just be quiet about this... America is doing the right thing" looooool

Every other nation in the world is quiet about a great many things. They are quiet about the US overthrowing a democratically elected government in Ukraine. They are quiet about the Ukrainian government shooting down a passenger airliner and blaming it on Russia. They are quiet about the Israeli's genocide of the Palestinians. They are quiet about the use of chemical weapons in Syria by the US sponsored rebels only to be blamed on Assad. They were quiet about the fact that Saddam Hussein didn't have any WMD programs after 1991. They were quiet when the US started that war, knowing it was wrong with false justifications, and many of them supporting and participating in it. Most of the countries of the world are colonies of the United States. They lie, cheat, steal, and murder for the US. Why wouldn't they lie about nukes being used?



posted on Oct, 29 2014 @ 06:22 AM
link   
The NEO article with the picture is interesting.
Especially the part where it claims that over 50 nuclear bombs have been used since 1945.
Including the ones used in Iraq and Afghanistan.

I find this absurd on a grand scale.

Aside from the literally hundreds of test nukes detonated in the cold war there have been no full scale nukes used in warfare since Hiroshima and Nagasaki.
It's possible that between the US and USSR there have been a few tactical nukes used but not likely.

(The 101st Airborne unit that crashed in Newfoundland back in the mid eighties likely had a tactical nuke on board but that's another thread.)

The level of explosives available in the real world far outstrip those most people are used to seeing in movies.

Video and pictures of these devices at night are far more spectacular than what they look like during the day.

The picture and videos of bombs in syria are impressive and interesting as they are obviously newer technology.
With heavy bombers flying missions over Syria, big weapons are to be expected.

They are not nukes.
If they'd been nuked the whole world would know it and all hell would be breaking loose.

The large fireball with secondary atmospheric detonations is the most compelling. It is not a nuke and the flashes are not lightning despite what the guy in the video is saying.
But it's a hell of a thing. I'd like to find out more about it.




edit on 29-10-2014 by badgerprints because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 29 2014 @ 06:34 AM
link   
a reply to: Adaluncatif


Every other nation in the world is quiet about a great many things. They are quiet about the US overthrowing a democratically elected government in Ukraine.


That's because the US did not overthrow the Ukrainian government, its President was corrupted and defected to Russia.


They are quiet about the Ukrainian government shooting down a passenger airliner and blaming it on Russia.


No-one blames it on Russia; the preponderance of evidence is that pro-Russian separatists shot it down by accident.


They are quiet about the Israeli's genocide of the Palestinians.


Do you read the news at all? Israel has no friends left.


They are quiet about the use of chemical weapons in Syria by the US sponsored rebels only to be blamed on Assad.


That's because that accusation has never been proven. It has been proven that Assad used cluster munitions against his own people, so chemical agents are not much of a stretch.


They were quiet about the fact that Saddam Hussein didn't have any WMD programs after 1991.


You obviously don't live in the United States. That became a major campaign issue.


They were quiet when the US started that war, knowing it was wrong with false justifications, and many of them supporting and participating in it.


The overwhelming majority of nations condemned the United States for invading Iraq.


Most of the countries of the world are colonies of the United States. They lie, cheat, steal, and murder for the US. Why wouldn't they lie about nukes being used?


Finished? The source of this claim is a Russian government propaganda organ masquerading as a private news site. The Russians are making this claim unofficially because they know it is not true!

How does the "expert" cited know that "neutron bombs are always white?" As has been pointed out, a nuclear detonation would be detected by Russian and Chinese satellites as well as Israeli and Iranian ground stations. Are Russia, China and Iran "United States colonies?" It would also have been detected by seismographs all over the world. This thread should be moved to [HOAX!]
edit on 29-10-2014 by DJW001 because: Edit to polish style.



posted on Oct, 29 2014 @ 06:38 AM
link   
a reply to: DJW001

Seismographs all over the world? So all nukes are giant nukes by default?



posted on Oct, 29 2014 @ 06:39 AM
link   

originally posted by: nukedog
a reply to: DJW001

Seismographs all over the world? So all nukes are giant nukes by default?


There's no such thing as a little bitty nuclear explosion.



posted on Oct, 29 2014 @ 06:44 AM
link   

originally posted by: DJW001

originally posted by: nukedog
a reply to: DJW001

Seismographs all over the world? So all nukes are giant nukes by default?


There's no such thing as a little bitty nuclear explosion.


10k of TNT seems to be the smallest payload developed. How big is that?



posted on Oct, 29 2014 @ 06:57 AM
link   

originally posted by: nukedog

originally posted by: DJW001

originally posted by: nukedog
a reply to: DJW001

Seismographs all over the world? So all nukes are giant nukes by default?


There's no such thing as a little bitty nuclear explosion.


10k of TNT seems to be the smallest payload developed. How big is that?


It would probably be detected as about a magnitude 4+ quake.

Easy reference.

Difficult reference.

In any event, Iran would certainly be screaming about the fallout.



posted on Oct, 29 2014 @ 07:07 AM
link   
This is coming from Gordon Duff.....so it's most likely complete BS.



posted on Oct, 29 2014 @ 08:07 AM
link   
Good Ole ATS...so many gullible people.



posted on Oct, 29 2014 @ 08:12 AM
link   

originally posted by: transola
Good Ole ATS...so many gullible people.


So many gullible people? Have you read the thread at all?



posted on Oct, 29 2014 @ 08:21 AM
link   
If the U.S. detonated a nuclear device ANYWHERE, the world would know. Fast. Like incredibly fast.

Look at it this way, North Korea can't test a small few dozen kiloton device without everyone knowing. And they test those underground.

On top of that, there are radiation detector networks in most nations that would detect the radioactive byproducts of a nuclear detonation. So depending on wind speed and direction, it would only take a few hours to a few days for some nation somewhere to detect these byproducts.

Long story short, if the U.S. were to detonate a nuke anywhere, there would be a international crapstorm the likes of which haven't been seen since the cuban missile crisis.



posted on Oct, 29 2014 @ 08:49 AM
link   
a reply to: Zcustosmorum
Gordon Duff seems to have lost his mind...or he is dabbling in short stories. He wrote an article about the US and China battling UFO's off the coast of California awhile back.

Read some of his older articles and you will see that they are very entertaining, but very light on facts/sources.



posted on Oct, 29 2014 @ 08:52 AM
link   

originally posted by: superman2012
a reply to: Zcustosmorum
Gordon Duff seems to have lost his mind...or he is dabbling in short stories. He wrote an article about the US and China battling UFO's off the coast of California awhile back.






Link?



posted on Oct, 29 2014 @ 08:53 AM
link   
a reply to: nukedog



why we are bombing Syria again?


Because US defeated Hitler in the Vietnam war in Iraq fighting global terrorism.



posted on Oct, 29 2014 @ 09:01 AM
link   
a reply to: maghun




"No" said Eisenhower, unsheathing his nuclear powered gigasword, "Not today, Mecha-Hitler." And with that, he cut Mecha-Hitler in twain. Slowly, an american flag unfurls behind him, and a bald eagle flies overhead, dropping an AR-15 with a drum magazine in his other hand.

"Looks like your Reich.... Just got REKT."

YYYYYEEEEEEEEAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHH


This needs to be a movie.



posted on Oct, 29 2014 @ 09:07 AM
link   
a reply to: ScientificRailgun


Charlie Kelly: [Charlie's America Song] I'm gonna rise up, I'm gonna kick a little ass, Gonna kick some ass in the USA, Gonna climb a mountain, Gonna sew a flag, Gonna fly on an Eagle, I'm gonna kick some butt, I'm gonna drive a big truck, I'm gonna rule this world, Gonna kick some ass, Gonna rise up, Kick a little ass, ROCK, FLAG AND EAGLE!



posted on Oct, 29 2014 @ 10:47 AM
link   



posted on Oct, 29 2014 @ 01:45 PM
link   

originally posted by: SLAYER69
a reply to: Zcustosmorum

Short answer?

NO


Long answer?

No, but why waste a great opportunity to drag the US through the mud with speculation and conjecture.



The U.S. drags itself through the mud quite capably


And I notice how no-one has brought up the arming other nations part being in complete contradiction of the constitution either.


edit on -180002014-10-29T13:50:50-05:00u5031201450102014Wed, 29 Oct 2014 13:50:50 -0500 by Zcustosmorum because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 29 2014 @ 01:58 PM
link   

originally posted by: Zcustosmorum

The U.S. drags itself through the mud quite capably


edit on -180002014-10-29T13:50:50-05:00u5031201450102014.....


Agreed

So why the need to use fiction? Must be a slow News day.

P.S. Your sock is showing.



edit on 29-10-2014 by SLAYER69 because: (no reason given)




top topics



 
32
<< 1    3  4 >>

log in

join