It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Caver78
a reply to: ArmyOfNobunaga
Everyones entitled to their opinion. No harm, no foul.
Like I said I used to share your opinion. Unfortunately not all reports are made public. In different area's they certainly are aggressive, this is backed up by historical reports by Native Americans or First Nations in these same areas. South Western BC is just one of these areas.
As far as using tranquilizer darts, well it makes sense, but the variables are such that in the field it becomes impractical . We haven't a clue about the appropriate dosage plus as large as the BF are reported to be, a semi-doped individual is going to be extremely difficult to deal with. JMO of course.
originally posted by: Tangerine
You can't prove the exist but you can prove they're aggressive? Exactly how does that work?
Obviously, the people who propose to do this are aggressive. Would the same solution be appropriate when applied to them? Just asking.
The men of the GCBRO are not wishy-washy Cryptozoologists. These are men of action, military-types who are convinced that what they are seeing and experiencing is real.