It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: NOrrTH
I looks like a foot print to me and is possible according to this guy:
"C.David on September 23, 2014 at 11:14 pm said:
…Granite is igneous…..?
In fact Granite is not igneous as was once supposed. Granite comes in two forms. The first is the harder of the two from which most of granite bedrock is made. This type of granite was never under a molten state and is found accross the earth. It contains radio isotopic polonium halo imprints within the granite which have had half lives of less then 90 seconds and all of which are completely round. These polonium halos are found in this granite in every sample no matter where in the world they are found.
The second type of granite is sedimentary granite which comes from the former type of granite but has been pulverized to a finite level several times larger then that of silica or sand. This is where we find footprints of man or animals. It hardens into concrete much the same way sandstone hardens from compressed sand, therebye preserving the footprints.
originally posted by: Cinrad
Whether the guys bringing this to our attention are creation scientists or not, the claims have to be discussed not the philosophies of the ones bringing it to us.
originally posted by: Cinrad
But I don't dismiss their claims simply because of who they are, there are some very good points made by them, for example who would have studied polonium halos if it had not been brought up as a subject by a creation scientist?
Gentry's polonium halo hypothesis for a young Earth fails, or is inconclusive for, all tests. Gentry's entire thesis is built on a compounded set of assumptions. He is unable to demonstrate that concentric haloes in mica are caused uniquely by alpha particles resulting from the decay of polonium isotopes. His samples are not from "primordial" pieces of the Earth's original crust, but from rocks which have been extensively reworked. Finally, his hypothesis cannot accommodate the many alternative lines of evidence that demonstrate a great age for the Earth. Gentry rationalizes any evidence which contradicts his hypothesis by proposing three "singularities" - one time divine interventions - over the past 6000 years. Of course, supernatural events and processes fall outside the realm of scientific investigations to address. As with the idea of variable radioactive decay rates, once Gentry moves beyond the realm of physical laws, his arguments fail to have any scientific usefulness. If divine action is necessary to fit the halo hypothesis into some consistent model of Earth history, why waste all that time trying to argue about the origins of the haloes based on current scientific theory? This is where most Creationist arguments break down when they try to adopt the language and trappings of science. Trying to prove a religious premise is itself an act of faith, not science.
In the end, Gentry's young Earth proposal, based on years of measuring discoloration haloes, is nothing more than a high-tech version of the Creationist "Omphalos" argument. This is the late nineteenth century proposition that while God created the Earth just 6,000 years ago according to the Genesis account, He made everything appear old. Unfortunately, because Gentry has published his original work on haloes in reputable scientific journals, a number of basic geology and mineralogy text books still state that microscopic discoloration haloes in mica are the result of polonium decay.
The first footprint I ever read about was in South Africa. I’ve seen pictures and read people’s online debate about whether it is a real footprint or whether it is just strange “weathering.” On our trip to South Africa last year I arranged for us to go see this footprint.
When I got there, I was excited to see this almost 4 foot tall footprint. What I did not expect was to have “a moment.” As I touched and felt the footprint, I could see and feel the mud that squished between the toes and hardened over time. I could feel the curvature of the arch and the impression of the heel. This was no product of weathering. This was a foot. And, if you know anything about the study of the Nephilim giants (which is what I believe this is), they were reported to have six fingers and six toes. I saw and felt the sixth toe on this foot.
Scientific Proof Giants Were Real
“Giants often have six fingers and six toes.” Many in the Illuminati Royal Families had 6 fingered Hands. (Reptilian Blood lines) The amazing revelation that GIANTS are back on the earth in increasing numbers makes any Bible-based Christian think of our Lord’s words: “ But as the days of Noe were, so shall also the coming of the Son of man be” Matthew 24:37. There were giants on earth before the Great Flood (and in the land of Canaan later on): Deuteronomy 2:20; 3:13; and Joshua 17:15 et al.
PDF - GIANTS ON THE EARTH
originally posted by: HooHaa
One of the characteristics of a nephilim is 6 fingers and 6 toes.
originally posted by: HooHaa
...the bible also says the nephilim have six fingers and or six toes. You can do a google search and find digs where they have uncovered tall skeletons (9 to 14 feet) that have six fingers and toes.
originally posted by: Chaos Lord
Research Anunaki and Nephillim! While your at it Grigori, Elohim, Cherubim! This is also mentioned in the Bible. It's why Native Americans used to say "How" and hold their hands high when greeting eachother. To show that they did not have the sixth digit. Why is ancient math based on a HEXADECIMAL sytem of 12!?!
originally posted by: SyxPak
a reply to: Hanslune
a reply to: SlapMonkey
Ok I understand Your statements, but what if there is only One piece of incidence for this? That foot print. You can see where the mud, at the time of origin, squished up from the front of it's toes. Pretty fair hoax, if it is. But Thanx for the replies.
There have been many OOPART's found. Not that this is one necessarily, but in those cases, only one piece of 'evidence' to something strange and 'not acceptable' is right there!
I'm staying with an open mind on this. Later, Syx.
originally posted by: 8675309jenny
I'd says it's more likely magma consumed a giant manmade statue from 200million yrs ago and the statue eroded away leaving the print.
If it's not just a hoax in general.....
Road to Impuluzi's foot print
• From the N17 turn to Amsterdam on the R33
• At 6km you will get a beautiful view of the typical boulder area which you are traveling in before it was planted with trees this was how the Empuluzi district looked like.
• At 8km you will cross the Mpuluzi River which starts close to Florence Guest Farm.
• Just after the river you will see die Busby Eucalyptus oil factory on the left (No Entry). You can see the typical eucalyptus trees on either side of the uphill road.
• At 12.9km the Lothair turn off to your right (you are welcome to investigate this typical wood industry town.
• At 15.8km turn left to EMPULUZI
• Zero again
• At 4.4km turn left at the York Arhur Seat Sign. ( It was ran over by a truck, and does not exist) It is only l.l km gravel road to the footprint.
• The gravel road will immediately fork but keep left it will fork again but keep right this time on the bigger road. The road are not in good shape, take it slow.
• At 5,5km you have arrived at IMPULUZI'S site. A Forest signboard will mark the spot.
The footprint is way at the top at the base of the "mound" of rocks near the top. Also, there is what appears to be a hand print, right next to the footprint. Which makes me think there is something significant about this place. The rocks to me, do not appear to be naturally jutting out of the ground like one would supposed. They appear to me, to be placed there (by more giants?)... and if it is a hand and footprint, could this be a marker...even a grave marker? Could this giant be buried here? I might be completely wrong, but I can't get that idea out of my head.
Also, there is what appears to be a hand print, right next to the footprint. Which makes me think there is something significant about this place. The rocks to me, do not appear to be naturally jutting out of the ground like one would supposed. They appear to me, to be placed there (by more giants?)... and if it is a hand and footprint, could this be a marker...even a grave marker? Could this giant be buried here? I might be completely wrong, but I can't get that idea out of my head.
Different people take different shots of the footprint and depending on the angle you take the photo at, it looks like a 5 toed giant or a 6 toed giant. It is because of the depth of the footprint and if you take it from too far left, it covers the 6th toe. There is definitely a 6th toe....I've outlined it below:
As I said, if you get too far left, the crease between the last two toes disappears and in an illusion, you see that being one toe.
I interviewed a guy who told me the local folklore of the footprint. Also, very interesting, I spoke with a lady who told me about another footprint in Swaziland. She mentions the area that it is in at the very beginning of the clip. She didn't want to tell me much about it at first because she said it is so sacred, but I got her to talk about it a little.
Giant Footprint of Mpuluzi
originally posted by: borntowatch
originally posted by: L0125D
Oh my..... looks like creationists are going to have to push their timeline back by a lot.
Or atheists improve on their outdated dating techniques, oh wait, you cant be wrong, science is perfect
Evolutionists/uniformitarianists base their assumptions upon other assumptions and claim it is scientific to do so. All dating methods are fallacious, based upon circular reasoning, plagued by numerous problems, and begin and end with assumptions. The only thing about them which is scientific. is the estimated decay rate, and even this is speculative since it is verified that the speed of light is decaying (reducing) and thus also the decay rate of radioactive materials is also decaying (reducing). Science demonstrates the earth to be only a few thousand years old, just like the bible tells us it is!