It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Breaking: Soldier shot at war memorial in Ottawa

page: 36
122
<< 33  34  35    37  38  39 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Oct, 23 2014 @ 01:37 PM
link   
This is a photo of Cpl Nathan Cirillo taken moments before he was slain yesterday. He is the soldier on the left of the photo.



In background, the parliament building is on the left and the (Fairmount) Chateau Laurier on the right.
edit on 23-10-2014 by aboutface because: (no reason given)




posted on Oct, 23 2014 @ 01:45 PM
link   

originally posted by: Kram09
No doubt the Canadian government will bring in severe legislation which will only end up restricting the freedoms of ordinary Canadians.


No doubt:

www.aol.com...|main5|dl1|sec1_lnk3%26pL id%3D550917
Harper... signaled a radical shift towards American-style anti-terror tactics. ... ....He then promised expanded powers for his country's anti-terror agents.
"Our laws and police powers need to be strengthened in the areas of surveillance, detention and arrest," said Harper. "They need to be much strengthened... that work will be expedited."

Bend Over, here it comes again!



posted on Oct, 23 2014 @ 01:49 PM
link   

originally posted by: starviego

originally posted by: Kram09
No doubt the Canadian government will bring in severe legislation which will only end up restricting the freedoms of ordinary Canadians.


No doubt:

www.aol.com...|main5|dl1|sec1_lnk3%26pL id%3D550917
Harper... signaled a radical shift towards American-style anti-terror tactics. ... ....He then promised expanded powers for his country's anti-terror agents.
"Our laws and police powers need to be strengthened in the areas of surveillance, detention and arrest," said Harper. "They need to be much strengthened... that work will be expedited."

Bend Over, here it comes again!


Yup. Here it comes. Hopefully Harper doesn't go full Bush on us though, I do like him as a leader.



posted on Oct, 23 2014 @ 01:54 PM
link   
a reply to: starviego

Bring it. Whatever it takes to get rid of the religious wack-jobs.
IE totally infringing on their rights.

Never had a problem with cops and have nothing to hide. If a few extra rules can keep my countrymen safe from these Islamic radical dirt bags then so be it.

911 and the surveillance, rules, regulations, etc never effected me one iota.

To not do anything because your afraid the government might be snooping on your (our) insignificance, ie porn on your computar (lol) Is giving the wackjobs the chance at really screwing with our lives.
So how do you want it when you "bend over"?
Your government to do the deed?
Or a filthy terrorist?
hmmm



edit on 23-10-2014 by canucks555 because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 23 2014 @ 02:02 PM
link   
a reply to: canucks555
how about we just stop bombing their women and children?


The United Nations reported that in the year of 2011 the civilian death toll in Afghanistan was 3,021 and 4,507 Afghans were wounded. According to other sources the actual number of civilian casualties was probably five times as large as the number that the UN mentioned. In February 2012 the annual report on ‘Protection of civilians in armed conflict’ prepared by the UN Assistance Mission in Afghanistan (UNAMA) and the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR), acknowledged that 3,021 civilian deaths last year is an increase of eight percent than the previous year’s total of 2,790. Jan Kubis, the head of UNAMA said that “for much too long, Afghan civilians have paid the highest price of war. Parties to the conflict must greatly increase their efforts to protect civilians to prevent yet another increase in civilian deaths and injuries in 2012.” He also stated that according to U.N. figures, “the Taliban and their allies were responsible for 79 percent of civilian casualties, Afghan and NATO led ISAF 9 percent, but it was not clear who was responsible for the remaining 12 percent of the casualties”.

These target killings of NATO-led ISAF are total violation of the UN Charter. The Geneva Convention clearly mentions that “Civilians shall not be the object of attack”. No one should be above the law
www.globalresearch.ca...

nato is the new knatzis


edit on Thupm10b201410America/Chicago23 by Danbones because: (no reason given)

edit on Thupm10b201410America/Chicago58 by Danbones because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 23 2014 @ 02:14 PM
link   
Those posters who think "Radical Islam" had anything to do with this attack have been drinking the Kool-Aid. For God's sake wake up!



posted on Oct, 23 2014 @ 02:24 PM
link   
In an interview just aired on CBC, a friend of his who also stayed at the Ottawa Mission said he was wanting to go to Libya to escape the drug scene here because for him that was the only way out of his personal hell. He was awaiting his passport and when he was turned down a couple of days ago, he disintegrated, was incoherent on drugs and you know the rest.



posted on Oct, 23 2014 @ 02:29 PM
link   
how about we just stop bombing their women and children?

The "We bombed them so I think it's great that they're giving payback now" line used to be a good one back in the day, it's time to put that argument to rest.
Let them kill us, we deserve it! Uh, no I don't follow that philosophy.

War is war, I'll be damned if I'm gonna suffer because my government partook in certain middle eastern issues. I'm not gonna take it up the keester and say sorry.

We do what it takes. Take away their rights, ban them from flying here, bomb them, slap them, put them in jail, make examples out of them.
Hate them as they do us. Spill their blood, do what we can to destroy their twisted religion, make fun of them, taunt them.

Those posters who think "Radical Islam" had anything to do with this attack have been drinking the Kool-Aid. For God's sake wake up!

Don't tell me, it was an inside job? Please hopefully you're not defending terrorism by deflecting the blame?
edit on 23-10-2014 by canucks555 because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 23 2014 @ 02:31 PM
link   

originally posted by: aboutface.... he ... was incoherent on drugs and you know the rest.


And what drug would that be? Meth, or Prozac?



posted on Oct, 23 2014 @ 02:39 PM
link   

originally posted by: SamsonStrength

originally posted by: starviego

originally posted by: Kram09
No doubt the Canadian government will bring in severe legislation which will only end up restricting the freedoms of ordinary Canadians.


No doubt:

www.aol.com...|main5|dl1|sec1_lnk3%26pL id%3D550917
Harper... signaled a radical shift towards American-style anti-terror tactics. ... ....He then promised expanded powers for his country's anti-terror agents.
"Our laws and police powers need to be strengthened in the areas of surveillance, detention and arrest," said Harper. "They need to be much strengthened... that work will be expedited."

Bend Over, here it comes again!


Yup. Here it comes. Hopefully Harper doesn't go full Bush on us though, I do like him as a leader.


It really seems like they are trying to use this as much as possible to scare up support for increase militarization of the police and further loss of privacy. It was one guy with a shotgun and there are newspaper headlines like "Parliament under Siege". Seems like they are trying to blow it way out of proportion.



posted on Oct, 23 2014 @ 02:43 PM
link   
a reply to: canucks555

Problem is this guy was a Canadian, born and raised. His father was a terrorist who fought against Gaddafi and was allowed to return to Canada. I'm thinking he had more influence on his son that he will admit. Every terrorist who fought in Libya should be tracked, just as CSIS is supposedly tracking Canadians who joined ISIS.



posted on Oct, 23 2014 @ 02:47 PM
link   
a reply to: InvisibleOwl

I heard that they're rounding those on the watch list up like cattle. Just rumor though, hope it's true.



posted on Oct, 23 2014 @ 02:50 PM
link   
a reply to: canucks555

The way you talk about killing people and bombing.. disgusting...you are no difference than the terrorist that are trying to attack us.

Why would you put the arguement to rest? it is a fact they might be pissed off at us for hep US gov bomb them.. even tho all these attacks have no relation to ISIS yet.

This attack was more likely influenced by what ISIS do there and this shooter's need to get recognition... criminals like the shooter will gravitate toward such violence.



posted on Oct, 23 2014 @ 03:01 PM
link   
Haven't even read the thread...but I'll bet that this is somehow "America's fault" lol.



posted on Oct, 23 2014 @ 03:18 PM
link   
a reply to: canucks555




We do what it takes. Take away their rights, ban them from flying here, bomb them, slap them, put them in jail, make examples out of them.
Hate them as they do us. Spill their blood, do what we can to destroy their twisted religion, make fun of them, taunt them.


Sad, sad, sad. Seriously, take your poisonous hatred somewhere else.



posted on Oct, 23 2014 @ 03:23 PM
link   
a reply to: aboutface

"Gunman was wearing Arabic scarf." All I can say is, how convenient.
edit on 23-10-2014 by SpeakerofTruth because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 23 2014 @ 03:49 PM
link   
Ya ya, at least I'm not afraid to tell it like it is.
Sorry, terrorist atacks against my country don't give me that fuzzy wuzzy, let's embrace the enemy love feeling.

You may think you can be kissy-kissy to ISIS. Apologize for being Canadian, all that bs.
Have fun looking the other way while Radical Islam screws you over while your apologizing.
Sooner or later you'll realize that Canadas government and people come first before radical Islam.

Radical Islam must be abolished from this country. Pronto. =and those who believe in that version of Muslim faith must be crushed like the filthy maggots they are.

Oh and if you're pissed off about the government clamping down on citizen rights you can blame ISIS for that as well.
-Or is it more convenient for your philosophy to blame Canada?

edit on 23-10-2014 by canucks555 because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 23 2014 @ 03:49 PM
link   
The RCMP have released a fascinating and interesting video about events and timeline as shown in the footage of the surveillance cameras -link- It's worth the view, imo.
edit on 23-10-2014 by aboutface because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 23 2014 @ 03:52 PM
link   
How did the news reports have 3 gunman and I distinctly remember reports of one dead and police pursing two more, yet today, it's a lone gunman. AGAIN!?!?!



posted on Oct, 23 2014 @ 03:53 PM
link   
a reply to: jaffo

Nope. Try reading the thread next time




top topics



 
122
<< 33  34  35    37  38  39 >>

log in

join