It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
The Offender Segment captures data about each of the offenders in the incident (e.g., his/her
age, sex, race, and ethnicity). The reporting agency should submit a separate Offender
Segment for each of the (up to 99) offenders involved in the incident. If the reporting agency
knows nothing about the offenders—i.e., no one saw the offenders, there were no suspects,
and the number of offenders is unknown—then the agency should enter 00 = Unknown as the
data value for Data Element 36 (Offender Sequence Number), and leave Data Elements 37
through 39A blank. There must be at least one Offender Segment in each incident report.
originally posted by: butcherguy
originally posted by: applesthateatpeople
a reply to: smithjustinb
So...
You eat dogs, huh?
That's... odd.
Obama has.
Koreans do.
Many people would not eat horsemeat, but the French do and some Canadians do.
It is all about culture.
originally posted by: muse7
And anyone that has a problem with laws like these that are crafted to deliver harsher punishment to animal abusers, should perhaps consider moving to a place that provides a safe environment for them to practice their sick and twisted acts.
I hear Somalia and third world countries are a good places to consider, where there is no threat of evil government overreach!
originally posted by: smithjustinb
[
I'm the type of person who doesn't believe in pets. I think treating an animal as property is, in many cases, disrespectful to that animal. I am a minority in thinking this way. But, I don't care. I don't want any pets. Not that I couldn't handle the responsibility. I believe animals deserve basic respect. Imo, all animals deserve to be free and out in the wild and I would be happy to put them there so that they can live as free animals. If an animal fails to survive on its own, then that is its natural weakness on this planet and it naturally doesn't belong here in the most primal sense. Just like a lot of humans. If you fail to sustain yourself. That's called, "natural selection". You think I should be locked in a cage for wanting something to be free? Well, thats just like, your opinion man. And I really don't care about it.
originally posted by: smithjustinb
how easily someone might could be put on one of these watch lists by doing something that a lot of people would not consider neglect, like leaving your dog in the wild to try to survive on its own.
originally posted by: EnronOutrunHomerun
Romilo - When you say "dam(n) their rights and freedom" are you acknowledging that they do in fact have those attributes and you choose to ignore them?
originally posted by: smithjustinb
I'm the type of person who doesn't believe in pets. I think treating an animal as property is, in many cases, disrespectful to that animal. I am a minority in thinking this way. But, I don't care. I don't want any pets. Not that I couldn't handle the responsibility. I believe animals deserve basic respect. Imo, all animals deserve to be free and out in the wild and I would be happy to put them there so that they can live as free animals. If an animal fails to survive on its own, then that is its natural weakness on this planet and it naturally doesn't belong here in the most primal sense. Just like a lot of humans. If you fail to sustain yourself. That's called, "natural selection". You think I should be locked in a cage for wanting something to be free? Well, thats just like, your opinion man. And I really don't care about it.
originally posted by: crazyewok
Your a very very good example of why this law needs putting to effect. A 100% certified psychopath.
originally posted by: crazyewok
originally posted by: smithjustinb
how easily someone might could be put on one of these watch lists by doing something that a lot of people would not consider neglect, like leaving your dog in the wild to try to survive on its own.
What excuse if there to leave a domesticated animal out in the wild?
Really there are a dozen other options.
originally posted by: muse7
I know this is going off topic, but what do you think should be done with disabled people? Or people in wheelchairs that cannot sustain themselves without the help of others?
originally posted by: smithjustinb
originally posted by: crazyewok
originally posted by: smithjustinb
how easily someone might could be put on one of these watch lists by doing something that a lot of people would not consider neglect, like leaving your dog in the wild to try to survive on its own.
What excuse if there to leave a domesticated animal out in the wild?
Because idgaf. If a domesticated animal has done something bad enough that I feel like it should be dropped off in the woods somewhere then that's what I'm going to do and you and it can kma. Or, if I'm really mad enough, I'll just put a bullet in its head and call it justice.
Really there are a dozen other options.
Cry me a river.
originally posted by: smithjustinb
Because idgaf.
originally posted by: smithjustinb
If a domesticated animal has done something bad enough that I feel like it should be dropped off in the woods somewhere then that's what I'm going to do and you and it can kma. Or, if I'm really mad enough, I'll just put a bullet in its head and call it justice.
originally posted by: smithjustinb
Cry me a river.
originally posted by: smithjustinb
And. My point of this thread was to assert this right and in the process, piss off a few whiny liberals. Because I know how much you liberals like to whine. And, honestly, I enjoy eating your whines for breakfast. Which I have succeeded in doing so. So thank you.