It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
They are NOT known to me. I have looked at all the links provided and looked on my own. The only thing I have seen is claims and repeated lore with no real backup. I don't recall you ever providing any source for any assertions you have made. in contrast, I have provided multiple links and sources, even in this very thread, which you admittedly ignored and stuck with your beliefs that people were "loons" and "bitter ex wives".
The various links to landing traces, electromagnetic burns from these craft etc. are known to you so there is no need for me to go through the tedium of providing links that have already been provided for you on previous threads.
But it is possible to generate that information where no information exists. For instance in compression algorithms. Jpeg artifacts are a good example of this where even the artifacts are misinterpreted as alien.
Computing is based on mathematics. So is information theory. It is not possible to get information out of a domain if it does not reside in that domain in the first place.
A quadratic equation can map onto a range, which could be a graph on paper. The graph on paper cannot reveal information that is not contained in the equation. The equation is a condensed formula for the graph but it contains all the information that in can generate in the graph. This information is contained in they symbolic notation of the equation. The graph may seem to contain a greater QUANTITY of information because it may have millions of points but quantity is not the same as complexity.
If the perceived abduction narrative is generated by a real narrative that real narrative must be as complex as the thing it generates. In other words, the richness of the perceived narrative originates in the real narrative. But, in real terms, I believe that they are much the same thing. That is essentially what I am arguing.
If the perceived abduction narrative is generated by a real narrative...
...that real narrative must be as complex as the thing it generates.
It is not possible to get information out of a domain if it does not reside in that domain in the first place.
originally posted by: EnPassant
a reply to: draknoir2
You keep asserting that those who have such experiences do so in a cultural vacuum, and because of this any common "themes" that happen to emerge constitute proof of alien abduction.
I never said that. I argued that cultural influences don't create the image of the grey. I brought attention to the Valensole case that happened only MONTHS after Barney Hill described the grey alien. I have argued using common sense - yes, common sense goes a long way here - that cultural imagery is not as potent as some make it out to be, otherwise people would be getting abducted by Spock and seeing Christopher Lee as Dracula coming through the bed room walls. They'd be imagining Mickey Mouse sliding down a light beam into their bed rooms. These things don't happen. COMMON SENSE and a little thought will tell you that the argument about cultural influences is weak in terms of explaining what is being reported.
At best cultural imagery taints things but there is no evidence that it can provide an entire narrative such as is described by the abductees. These narratives are repeated over and over again; car stalls, bright lights, beings, medical exam...and so on. If cultural imagery was responsible different people would dress things differently according to their cultural conditioning. But the abduction narratives and tediously similar. COMMON SENSE will tell you that cultural conditioning is not likely to produce this repetitive narrative. The narrative began with abductees, not films or books. Certainly not in such quantities that would have people all over the place imagining the were abducted.
originally posted by: EnPassant
I never said that. I argued that cultural influences don't create the image of the grey. I brought attention to the Valensole case that happened only MONTHS after Barney Hill described the grey alien.
Burns have been documented. That's evidence, yes?
originally posted by: ZetaRediculian
a reply to: EnPassant
Burns have been documented. That's evidence, yes?
Its evidence of a story. Did it really happen like that? Its told in the third person, not directly from the person. As "evidence"? For ET? I don't think so. Doesn't mean its not. Its certainly evidence for an ET mythology since it's only a story. It certainly is questionable that a burn from an external source would last 4 hours only. Sounds more like an allergic reaction. Interesting. Thanks for the link. I actually came across it last night.
Your argument relies on undermining the witness testimony. This seems too much like squirming out of things
After checking the records of
rocket launches from Vandenberg Air
Force Base, I had discovered that there
was a rocket launch at almost the same
time the witness reported seeing his
UFO. Since the police officer stated it was
seen to the south and southeast, it was
no great effort to suggest the UFO was
the rocket launch.
originally posted by: DelMarvel
originally posted by: EnPassant
I never said that. I argued that cultural influences don't create the image of the grey. I brought attention to the Valensole case that happened only MONTHS after Barney Hill described the grey alien.
But once again, there were science fiction images of short, large headed aliens abducting people that went back years before those cases. There were accounts of encounters with little beings going back years. A lot of the original stories of little aliens are NOT completely consistent with the description of the greys. That consistent image obviously coalesced with a great deal of pop cultural influence. Going back to the fairies, those were accounts of abduction by little men but once again were NOT completely consistent with the contemporary grey abduction details. If there was not a cultural, folkloric, etc. component to this the stories would not vary like this.
originally posted by: JBurns
After reading this and two other related topics, I'd say it seems more like an organized effort to discredit the debunkers or otherwise criticize their criticism.
Ideally, there would be an organized effort to debunk claims. That is the scientific method isn't it? Question observations and hypotheses?
originally posted by: Tangerine
I agree with much that you said except that the descriptions of faeries varied tremendously.
originally posted by: Tangerine
originally posted by: JBurns
After reading this and two other related topics, I'd say it seems more like an organized effort to discredit the debunkers or otherwise criticize their criticism.
Ideally, there would be an organized effort to debunk claims. That is the scientific method isn't it? Question observations and hypotheses?
You're confusing skeptics with debunkers. Like true believers, debunkers simply take a position without regard for testable evidence. Skeptics, on the other hand, demand testable evidence be presented before accepting a claim as fact.
originally posted by: Harte
originally posted by: Tangerine
originally posted by: JBurns
After reading this and two other related topics, I'd say it seems more like an organized effort to discredit the debunkers or otherwise criticize their criticism.
Ideally, there would be an organized effort to debunk claims. That is the scientific method isn't it? Question observations and hypotheses?
You're confusing skeptics with debunkers. Like true believers, debunkers simply take a position without regard for testable evidence. Skeptics, on the other hand, demand testable evidence be presented before accepting a claim as fact.
"Debunk" is an active verb, not passive.
Debunkers are skeptics that are willing to provide evidence that a claim is actually false. The skeptic only asks for evidence that the claim is true, which is a passive position.
Harte
originally posted by: ZetaRediculian
a reply to: EnPassant
He also has permanent sunburn from this incident
Now that is convincing!
originally posted by: EnPassant
a reply to: ZetaRediculian
But there are other burn cases, such as the Cash Lundrum case. And others. They are not al likely to be mistakes.