It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Bybyots
a reply to: EnPassant
Sure, I was a student of Zen, I don't remember any teaching that said to notice them enough to decide that they are "Aliens".
So if you have never been abducted by aliens, and you have never had any sort of experiences that are like those of these "abductees" that you stand beside so strongly, how can you know what you are talking about?
You just take their word for it that it's "Aliens".
I find it hard to understand you in any other way than that you wish to believe in "Aliens" and how they are behind all of this subterfuge with 'abductions', and that's your bottom line.
How do you explain Terrence McKenna's experiences with Ketamine? He and others who took Ketamine claim to encounter that which McKenna called machine elves, beings with apparent intelligence, purpose and a world of their own. The people experimenting with this drug apparently visited this "world" repeatedly. Was that an objective reality? When the effects wore off, the users maintained the conviction that this world and the machine elves were real and that the drug simply allowed access to them.
We simply don't know how long an illusory narrative can be sustained. Your claim that if the perceived narrative is developed and complex then so too must be the real narrative is not based on testable evidence. How do you explain developed and complex dreams? How do you explain that which people experienced using Persinger's helmet?
Among the possibilities is encounters with interdimensional entities (paranormal), temporal lobe epilepsy, the release of natural chemicals in the body in response to trauma, delusions, mental illness, outright fabrication,
As for your claim that cultural imagery does not have such a powerful effect on the mind, otherwise people would be seeing King Kong and getting abducted by Spock, you simply don't know that. Can you explain why ancients claimed abduction by faeries and not greys? Can you explain why modern people claim abduction by greys and not faeries?
You have the tendency to reach conclusions in the absence of evidence. May I suggest that you do so because certainty is more comforting to you than uncertainty? May I further suggest that it is possible that some people who have traumatic events with the unknown prefer the certainty of ETs abducting them to the uncertainty of an experience they can't begin to understand?
originally posted by: ZetaRediculian
a reply to: Tangerine
How do you explain Terrence McKenna's experiences with Ketamine?
I love you man but lets get our entheogens correct! N,N-Dimethyltryptamine produces those effects
YUCK!
Ketamine (INN) is a medication used mainly for starting and maintaining anesthesia. Other uses include sedation in intensive care, as a pain killer, as treatment of bronchospasm, as a treatment for complex regional pain syndrome and as an antidepressant. It induces a trance like state while providing pain relief, sedation, and memory loss.[2] Heart function, breathing and airway reflexes generally remain functional.[2]
Common side effects include a number of psychological reactions as the medication wears.[3] This may include agitation, confusion and psychosis among others.[3][4] Elevated blood pressure and muscle tremors are relatively common, while low blood pressure and a decreasing in breathing is less so.[3][4] Spasms of the larynx may rarely occur.[3]
en.wikipedia.org...
en.wikipedia.org...
"Machine Elves"[edit]
One common feature of the halluginogenic experience caused by N,N-Dimethyltryptamine are hallucinations of humanoid like beings, characterised as being otherworldly. The terms Machine Elf was coined by ethnobotanist Terence McKenna for the experience, who also used the terms fractal elves, or self-transforming machine elves.[92][93]
For the sake of argument, do we know they were hallucinations? Could not N have allowed access to their very real world?
Well there you go again! You are asserting.
originally posted by: ZetaRediculian
a reply to: Tangerine
Well the reason I use the full name is because the short name wont post here. for good reason! Its a substance that has spawned off a whole other cultural phenomenon that has its own mythology and bad science. ATS is not a place for the drug culture to propagate. I support that but it makes real discussions challenging.
For the sake of argument, do we know they were hallucinations? Could not N have allowed access to their very real world?
yes. that's the debate among those folks. There are definitely people who are very credentialed that entertain that idea. Strassman for one. James Kent has a different view tripzine.com...
a reply to: draknoir2
Fact is flying saucers and abducting aliens are as American as apple pie and baseball, and have been since the forties. A constantly reinforced folklore, hopelessly ingrained in the public psyche.
originally posted by: EnPassant
a reply to: Tangerine
As I keep saying over and over again, demands for proof are not justified at this point. Please stop continually asking for proof. The only real discussion that can be had at this point is what hypothesis makes the best sense of things. Please stop asking for proof all the time, it is not forthcoming.
originally posted by: EnPassant
Well there you go again! You are asserting.
I am merely asserting my right to use common sense. What I said was based on how I experience the world to be. There is no point in endlessly entertaining exotic notions about what could be - not when they are not based on what we know.
Flying saucers happened in Europe long before they became common in America.
There are reports from all over Europe that suggest abduction before it happened in America.
In 1974/5 I read of a case of abduction, in a newspaper, outside America. We thought it was hilarious at the time because he claimed he had sex with an alien. I see it differently now.
originally posted by: ZetaRediculian
originally posted by: EnPassant
Well there you go again! You are asserting.
I am merely asserting my right to use common sense. What I said was based on how I experience the world to be. There is no point in endlessly entertaining exotic notions about what could be - not when they are not based on what we know.
Your assertions on what "we know" and what constitutes "endlessly entertaining exotic notions about what could be" is just insulting. You seem to want to assert your beliefs, experiences and what you consider knowledge into everyone else's beliefs and experiences. There seems to be one view that you will accept and that is yours. imho.
You can entertain notions about what could be up to a point but most of the 'could bes' that are presented here have less to back them up than ETH.
Besides, you cannot make a hypothesis out of 'could bes'. The could bes are conflicting with each other and won't unify into a meaningful whole. More so, they are usually not congruent with the facts;
There could be interdimensional beings generating an illusion in people's minds but how do illusions in the mind leave landing traces or leave electromagnetic burns on people's skin?
originally posted by: EnPassant
a reply to: ZetaRediculian
Yes they did. Read what I said. I said before they became COMMON in America. Flying saucers were reported in Europe before the wild west.
My claim is based on common sense and an understanding of basic scientific and mathematical principles. Information theory shows that you can't get more information out of something than is in it. For example, if an image is compressed using software, information is lost and cannot be retrieved. The information in the real narrative must be as complex as the perceived one if it is to generate that narrative. This is basic information theory.
originally posted by: EnPassant
a reply to: Tangerine
How do you explain Terrence McKenna's experiences with Ketamine? He and others who took Ketamine claim to encounter that which McKenna called machine elves, beings with apparent intelligence, purpose and a world of their own. The people experimenting with this drug apparently visited this "world" repeatedly. Was that an objective reality? When the effects wore off, the users maintained the conviction that this world and the machine elves were real and that the drug simply allowed access to them.
Probably cultural imagery dressing up real things. But the abduction scenario is different; all the abductees keep seeing the same thing. If it was cultural imagery they would all, most likely, see different things. The beings perceived are almost always greys or Nordics. Cultural imagery would provide a much wider variety than this.
We simply don't know how long an illusory narrative can be sustained. Your claim that if the perceived narrative is developed and complex then so too must be the real narrative is not based on testable evidence. How do you explain developed and complex dreams? How do you explain that which people experienced using Persinger's helmet?
My claim is based on common sense and an understanding of basic scientific and mathematical principles. Information theory shows that you can't get more information out of something than is in it. For example, if an image is compressed using software, information is lost and cannot be retrieved. The information in the real narrative must be as complex as the perceived one if it is to generate that narrative. This is basic information theory.
Among the possibilities is encounters with interdimensional entities (paranormal), temporal lobe epilepsy, the release of natural chemicals in the body in response to trauma, delusions, mental illness, outright fabrication,
Epilepsy does not stall car engines. The release of natural chemicals does not lead to electromagnetic burns from the perceived craft. They are not delusions because there is physical evidence - burns on the skin, just mentioned, landing traces etc. Not mental illness either, the abductees are sane. Not fabrication. They are not lying, not the real ones, at least.
As for your claim that cultural imagery does not have such a powerful effect on the mind, otherwise people would be seeing King Kong and getting abducted by Spock, you simply don't know that. Can you explain why ancients claimed abduction by faeries and not greys? Can you explain why modern people claim abduction by greys and not faeries?
Faeries are almost identical to greys - slanted eyes, long spindly arms. They might be the same thing. If they are, cultural conditioning as an explanation for the appearance of the greys goes out the____window. (I'm trying to write 'window' but the word won't come up on my post.)
You have the tendency to reach conclusions in the absence of evidence. May I suggest that you do so because certainty is more comforting to you than uncertainty? May I further suggest that it is possible that some people who have traumatic events with the unknown prefer the certainty of ETs abducting them to the uncertainty of an experience they can't begin to understand?
You may suggest these things. But my interest is in finding the best argument or hypothesis.
originally posted by: EnPassant
a reply to: Tangerine
As I keep saying over and over again, demands for proof are not justified at this point. Please stop continually asking for proof. The only real discussion that can be had at this point is what hypothesis makes the best sense of things. Please stop asking for proof all the time, it is not forthcoming.