Thats a keen story Dragon, I wonder if it will ever be investigated publicly though.


"One data recovery expert, Richard Wagner, has estimated that more than $100 million in illegal transactions appeared to have rushed through the WTC computers before and during the disaster."

I wonder if that had anything to do with the demolition of the building. as we all know by now the planes didnt create that much damage.


[Edited on 1-6-2003 by ADVISOR]

Originally posted by ADVISOR
Thats a keen story Dragon, I wonder if it will ever be investigated publicly though.

[Edited on 1-6-2003 by ADVISOR]

I kinda doubt it...

The stock trade, plus Andrew Silverstein taking out a fat insurance policy 7 weeks before 9/11............

Alot of evidence will never be publically explored. And anything that goes against the media hype will be laughed at.

I remember hearing something about this couple months back....

Let's see if this makes the headline news on MSNBC and CNN. I doubt it.

Why would the illuminati/Cabal expose themselves publically? They've profited from 9/11 in many many ways and they continue to do so.

um tut money is power

Well, I for one think this needs very close attention and I'm troubled our governemt , whom have our best interests at heart ( a tear ) haven't explored this avenue further. I think a natinwide petition and movement toward finding the answer is needed. There are just some things the people have to demand and demand hard and I think losing 3000 of our countrymen and women more than justifies every expense in investigating every avenue no matter wher it leads..if even to the top.

[Edited on 2-6-2003 by astrocreep]

Lets list the reasons why our government would not investigate it. There is clearly a purpose behind their misaction.

I recall some news stories about this when it first broke, and I thought the amount of short-sells didn't seem like more than any other day of the market.

I think a few weeks later, it was confirmed that the suspected market activity wasn't out of the ordinary, and many insititional investors were shorting airline stocks at the time (smart idea even before 9|11).

safe guards were in place NORAD, FAA, military jets could have and should have intercepted, they were not engaged, why? Who stood the most to win? We have been here before, Fool me once shame on me, fool me twice shame on you, guess who.
tut tut

Originally posted by William
I recall some news stories about this when it first broke, and I thought the amount of short-sells didn't seem like more than any other day of the market.

I think a few weeks later, it was confirmed that the suspected market activity wasn't out of the ordinary, and many insititional investors were shorting airline stocks at the time (smart idea even before 9|11).

Hey all,

I remember the news on this as well. From what I remember the stock transactions were traced back to members of al-queida. I think the biggest gain was somewhere in the area of seven million, that was from the plunging of the united or american stock. I will look for a story on this later as to what the outcome really was.

I doubt terrorist masterminds would have touched stock transactions on 9/11 without a very good cover. If anything, an investigation could lead to a several thousand innocent suspects that sold before the breakdown, september is a typical selling season. And selling before 9/11 turned out to be as juicy as buying right after 9/11, so why take the risk ?

Originally posted by seedy_sid
um tut money is power

bull crap money is to acquire toys
power is personal and you take it where you go

Well...

I would argue that money is indeed power, however, the blanket statement doesn't really apply until we're considing amounts in the billions of dollars when we say "money is power". Anything less is just for buying toys.

I wouldn't say "Money is power" as much as "Who you know is power" and money just follows.

While I doubt there is some sinister organization ruling the world, I don't doubt that "powerful people" connect and make sure that they stay powerful. Money is just one form of that but in nations where money was never prominent the powerful people still ruled.

In Feudal Europe land was money you could say.

I just don't buy that "money is power" can be the all encompassing umbrella, in the end, it is all about who you know.