It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
A new commandment I give to you, that you love one another, even as I have loved you, that you also love one another. By this all men will know that you are My disciples, if you have love for one another."
"'Do not seek revenge or bear a grudge against anyone among your people, but love your neighbor as yourself. I am the LORD."
Be devoted to one another in love. Honor one another above yourselves.
And this is his command: to believe in the name of his Son, Jesus Christ, and to love one another as he commanded us.
originally posted by: Kali74
a reply to: beezzer
No, they won't. People, regardless of how much they hate religion will not tolerate oppression of anyone, you might be willing to accept oppression of Gays but those of us who aren't won't tolerate it against anyone.
originally posted by: windword
a reply to: ketsuko
I worked for a couple who owned a bar and a restaurant. They were Mormons and didn't even touch coffee or cola. Religious people need to choose what businesses offend their senses and stay away from them.
It appears that these people have invested in the wrong business for them. They either need to hire someone who isn't religiously offended to officiate gay weddings or they need to get out the "hitchin" business.
originally posted by: windword
originally posted by: Bone75
originally posted by: windword
a reply to: beezzer
Granting the legal recognition of marriage to gay couples isn't attacking anyone's religion.
6 months in jail for every day you refuse to marry 2 gay people isn't an attack?
Gays have the right to NOT be discriminated against. If that is the penalty for violating a person's civil rights, then so be it.
originally posted by: sheepslayer247
No. Forgive me, I'm not understanding your point. Can you elaborate?
originally posted by: windword
I worked for a couple who owned a bar and a restaurant. They were Mormons and didn't even touch coffee or cola. Religious people need to choose what businesses offend their senses and stay away from them.
It appears that these people have invested in the wrong business for them. They either need to hire someone who isn't religiously offended to officiate gay weddings or they need to get out the "hitchin" business.
originally posted by: Kali74
Nor should you, if that's what you believe... just don't open a business offering marriage ceremonies to the public.
Mark 10: 6-9
But from the beginning of the creation, God ‘made them male and female.’[a] 7 ‘For this reason a man shall leave his father and mother and be joined to his wife, 8 and the two shall become one flesh’; so then they are no longer two, but one flesh. 9 Therefore what God has joined together, let not man separate.”
originally posted by: beezzer
When it is done on churches, when government starts dictating to religions, I wonder if you all will still support government then.
Many of you appear fine with this simply because of their tax status.
If churches had their tax status changed, would you still cheer government imposition?
originally posted by: beezzer
a reply to: sheepslayer247
That's my issue.
I see so many here jumping for the side of government.
I have serious doubts that many here would support religion if government started imposing sanctions.
originally posted by: beezzer
a reply to: crazyewok
Too true.
If we allow the government to dictate what a religion can believe, then I think it's time for a reboot.
originally posted by: ketsuko
a reply to: sheepslayer247
And when equality trumps liberty?
What happens when equality becomes so important that it forces you to violate your conscience? What if it's decided we must eventually have a state religion of some sort. No, I am not saying Christianity, but simply a state religion. What if you were forced by law to participate in it as was everyone else no matter what their former beliefs were? You understand this is all done in the interests of equality.
And what if Michelle O's lunch rules are extended to all, everywhere? In the interests of equality. No matter what your personal dietary requirements might be.