It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
If,like in the case of the McCann's someone states that they feel it was their own fault for leaving their children alone, then they are entitled to their opinion. This isn't trolling, it's expressing an opinion. Even if they state they wish something bad on you, that's their opinion, that's not trolling, unless they state that they are going to do something bad to you. Then a threat has been made and the police should become involved.
originally posted by: Kandinsky
It's really about frequency and level of harassment. Someone's 'right to an opinion' doesn't transcend someone's right to peace and privacy. Should someone choose to write an offensive comment to another person, it's likely to be okay. If that person chooses to repeatedly make offensive comments to the same person/people, shouldn't there be a point where the target's quality of life is being deliberately being diminished?
The psychological damage caused by a high frequency of negative comments is well established. It can be enough to drive people to suicide without ever uttering a single threat.
originally posted by: Kandinsky
and it's anyone's guess how effective the police and CPS have been applying the existing laws?
originally posted by: Kandinsky
I think we're also talking at cross purposes. You're thinking of general rudeness and snipes whereas I'm thinking of incidents where individuals/groups have their lives negatively impacted for the 'lulz.'
Earlier, the award ceremony’s organizers had received an anonymous e-mail that stated, “A bomb will be detonated at the Game Developers Choice award ceremony tonight unless Anita Sarkeesian’s Ambassador Award is revoked. We estimate the bomb will kill at least a dozen people and injure dozens more. It would be in your best interest to accept our simple request. This is not a joke. You have been warned.” The message was just one example of the many threats that Sarkeesian had received since launching her video series. In 2012, the Times reported that Sarkeesian had been sent images showing video-game characters raping her. Her Wikipedia entry was repeatedly vandalized. One man created a Web game called Beat Up Anita Sarkeesian, in which players could punch Sarkeesian’s image and watch her face become bruised. The violent threats have continued unabated; Sarkeesian fled her home in August after a Twitter user posted her address and threatened to kill her.
originally posted by: LABTECH767
a reply to: Pandaram
..another control mechanism and will not stop the problem at all, indeed when someone has there hand's tied they are likely to fight harder to be free, likewise if you gag them and they have something to say.
This law will be unenforceable with only test cases and less than one percent prosecution of only high status Troll's who attack members of the government or cause a news worthy suicide's, instead the government should have gone after the ISP's and Chat room's to ensure they are policing themselves properly.
It will however be good to stop some form's of cyber crime and cyber trolling is often related to cyber stalking with can turn into real world stalking and worse, also cyber bullying has to stop.
Like I say though I feel this is merely a political stunt and I am sad to say that it will be used to stop free speech by targeting online activists etc, you know in Britain we used to have a place, one place only in london called Speakers Corner and there you could say anything you wished as it was a place of free speech but not anymore so free speech in the UK is essentially dead, at least for the ethnic british.
originally posted by: Pandaram
internet trolling become major crime in uk from today. if proven, trolls will be sentence to 2 years in prison.
law makers call the issue as, (trolls are) poison seeds in the society.
Google uk news for more information.
originally posted by: gortex
a reply to: Kangaruex4Ewe
Death threats are one thing, but what one defines as grossly offensive can vary widely from person to person.
Exactly , there are many things this government has said and done I find deeply offensive but they define it as fairness.
It seems to me when faced with a problem the only response this Tory goverment has is the threat of prison , I believe if they win the next election any criticism of the govenment will likely carry a 6 month minimum term.
Anti-black bias is the most frequently reported hate crime motivation in the United States. Of the 8,208 hate crimes reported to the FBI in 2010, 48% were race related - with 70% of those having an anti-black bias
originally posted by: supermouse
This is mostly to stop people speaking up about the paedophile ring involving many prominent members of the British establishment.
Two years in jail for speaking out about it, or 40,000 pounds reward for keeping quiet. Easy choice.
This is tied in to making sure that anyone who is angered by the "rape is ok" message on TV had better keep quiet or they'll be locked up.
Also the sentence is absurd, what message does it give if threatening to hit someone has a higher sentence than actually hitting them?
Website operators in the UK may soon have to identify people who have posted defamatory messages online, allowing the victim to undertake legal action against the "troll" rather than against the website.